MMA fighters think they beat a Boxer in a no rules scenario

Hobbitgoblin

Well-Known Member
Mixed Martial artist always think they can beat a boxer in a street fight.

I'm like bruh... Ever heard of knife? Screw driver
Sit the fk down and pass the blunt.

In a life threatening situation the man with no conscience but survival wins. Ain't no mf who's pockets are empty walking out his door is the man that survives.

Lol sorry I was just watching MMA fights and saw old sparring partners. Remembering gym talk.
 
Last edited:

lusidghost

Well-Known Member
Mixed Martial artist always think they can beat a boxer in a street fight.

I'm like bruh... Ever heard of knife? Screw driver
Sit the fk down and pass the blunt.

In a life threatening situation the man with no conscience but survival wins. Ain't no mf who's pockets are empty walking out his door is the man that survives.

Lol sorry I was just watching MMA fights and saw old sparring partners. Remembering gym talk.
I know that this is a fairly old thread. I found it while searching for the MMA thread. But what you're saying is a boxer with a deadly weapon can beat an unarmed MMA fighter. That's pretty obvious. The boxer dies 99% of the time in an actual street fight though.
 

Hobbitgoblin

Well-Known Member
The conclusion was not in favor of either martial art. But rather the realistic fact. Fighting outside of competition is dangerous and often deadly. Any one with a weapon can drop even the most accomplished martial artist.

So when anyone says their martial art is superior in actual life and death moments. They are thinking like law abiding citizens. The difference between a house dog and a wolf in the wild. They watch too many movies... In life the man who kills first instantly wins while 99% are just showing off, angry, drunk, being macho etc. A killer is always ready to kill not fight. The fighter who meets a killer will die. A Killer isn't looking to fight his is a survival first consequences last. That's why whenever I hear this talk I'm like these dumb mf... But ya in bitch fight to show off for a girl etc mma guy has the highest chance to "win". Until they meet someone who doesn't "fight". Street fighting is stupid period
 

lusidghost

Well-Known Member
Yeah that's just stupid and not what those people are saying whatsoever. How about a boxer vs a woman with a gun?
 

Herb & Suds

Well-Known Member
I know that this is a fairly old thread. I found it while searching for the MMA thread. But what you're saying is a boxer with a deadly weapon can beat an unarmed MMA fighter. That's pretty obvious. The boxer dies 99% of the time in an actual street fight though.
Uh
Where do you think all those great boxers came from

The streets?
only thing limits a boxer is “rules” as to what they train to do
Plenty of bad men boxed
 

PadawanWarrior

Well-Known Member
If neither has weapons. And both have equal skills comparatively, Martial arts has its advantages. Boxers aren't trained to use every part of their body as a weapon.

How about WWF vs MMA, lol.
 

Hobbitgoblin

Well-Known Member
I know that this is a fairly old thread. I found it while searching for the MMA thread. But what you're saying is a boxer with a deadly weapon can beat an unarmed MMA fighter. That's pretty obvious. The boxer dies 99% of the time in an actual street fight though.
Yeah that's just stupid and not what those people are saying whatsoever. How about a boxer vs a woman with a gun?
Depends on
Uh
Where do you think all those great boxers came from

The streets?
only thing limits a boxer is “rules” as to what they train to do
Plenty of bad men boxed
I come from boxing. Repped the U.S team in my teens and 2 uncles that were world champions. My uncle was the man oscar De la hoya beat to win his first world title. I say that to say I know exactly your saying.

What I'm saying is the same.with one added fact It doesn't what martial art (boxing is also a martial art) . a killer kills in a fight so when people say one martial artist wins a street fight over another. They talking like stupid children.
 
Top