More Crooks hired by Obama

max420thc said:

obama has done alot of shit in less than two months.
lets see..hes shut down gittmo with no place to put the terrorists.
hes finnished off what was left of the banking industry and NATIONALIZING ALL THE BANKS AND INSURANCE COMPANYS.HE IS NATIONALIZING THE AUTO INDUSTRY.NATIONALIZING THE HEALTH CARE INDUSTRY .yea.
we get it he is a fucking communist, every time he opens his mouth the stock market drops into the toilet and peoples 401Ks retirements investments and everything else is being wiped out by this communist .
he has fucked up so much shit already the list is growing so long so fast it is ignorant.
did you see a proposed four TRILLION dollar budget.not to include cost over runs on everything.
let me put this into perspective for you libtards.4 trillion=40K dollars every single family in this country will go into debt for.

Click to expand...

dduo420 said:

Get the heck out of here... we are in this position due to ignorance and greed. Let's go back 75 days... and look at what that administration left behind... a huge mess for all generations to deal with... And now, we finally step into the 21st century!

Click to expand...

tipsgnob said:

every time your fingers hit the keyboard you show your ignorance......

Click to expand...

medicineman said:

I know, it's a real chore arguing with ignorance. Makes one think of the old axiom: Arguing with idiots will only make you an Idiot".

Click to expand...

fugaziebob said:

are you fucking serious it's march fucking 7th Obama was put in office on the 21st of January and he caused the economic problems we're

Punctuation, it's very important, were and we're are two very different things. Though this has nothing to do with whether or not the problems originated under Obama, this has to do with the fact that he's not making them better, Of course, I suppose that that's what can be expected from a Socialist.

facing whoever believes that is a idiot he didn't force the banks to fuck up they did that by themselves

No, there was the government and groups like ACORN pushing them towards making subprime mortgages by insisting that banks be forced to extend credit to subprime borrowers.

if I am LENDING somebody money hell yeah I am going to make sure They're not as stupid with it as they were before such as the banks the insurance companies all that can you get a loan with out you showing how your going to pay it back neither should the corporations.

I don't know why I bothered trying correcting the spelling. That entire last section needs a total rewrite. Are you trying to say that if you were lending some body money that you would make sure that they were not as irresponsible with your lending practices as the banks were with their Ninja Loans?

Oh, and dude, insurance companies don't make loans. The reason why AIG is in trouble is because they lacked sufficient internal controls to make sure some retarded cock-sucker in London wasn't making stupid bets.

What's more interesting is the fact that another factor in this problem is the use of an equation written by some idiot that tried to predict how risk worked. Might as well try reducing Earth to a single equation. Something like E(Nl) = Fe

Where E is Earth, Nl is the Number of Liberals on Earth, and Fe is how Fucked up Earth is going to be.

Just like the "magical" formula that all these trading firms were using to calculate risk that equation isn't going to work, mostly because no matter how fucked up you calculate Earth to be with a number of Liberals, you are underestimating it, because liberals have a weird ass way of having a cumulative effect on everything.

One only needs to look at the Education System to see that. 100 Teachers in 100 Schools, no big deal. 200,000 Teachers in 10,000 Schools, and you have serious fucking problems. Thus an equation like E(Nl) = Fe, with E being the Education System, and Nl being the number of liberals in the education system and Fe being how fucked up the schools are doesn't work, because it's going to underestimate the effect that liberals have on the education system by a good one hundred to three hundred percent, or a factor of 2 - 4x.

As proven by your incoherent, confusing post with all its misspellings and grammatical errors. Of course, the grammar is not important. Coherency, and making your point succinctly is.

It's great that you have an opinion, what's unfortunate is that's about the only thing the education system has provided you with...

Click to expand...

TheBrutalTruth said:

All right, now can you try putting that in Standardized English, cause it's very confusing post.

I mean, you don't borrow people money, you borrow money from people, you lend people money.

Click to expand...

fugaziebob said:

So your argument against what I wrote brutal truth is that in your opinion obama is not doing anything to help so that makes him a socialist.

Click to expand...

The next time a clue flies by, grab it quick so you'll have one.

ViRedd said:

No, what makes Obama a socialist is his desire to take from Peter to give to Paul.

If you'll open your mind a little, you'll see that we are progressing toward the type of socialism that is called fascism. Under fascism, unlike communism, government doesn't own the means of production, it just has strict dictatorial control over it. Witness what is happening with the takeover of the banks.

Obama isn't about setting the economy right, he's about changing the economic structure of the country. Obama is anti-capitalism and pro-socialism. He, and his cabinet are very scary people.

Quick! Wake up!

Vi

Click to expand...

tipsgnob said:

the economic structure of this country needs changing........what are you scared of old man?[/quote]

More agist insults from a brave, clueless, keyboard nerd, eh tips?

To answer your question though, I fear for young, blinded dunces like you who haven't a clue, who have no historical perspective to go on ... and who are voting themselves and their future generations into economic slavery.

Good enough answer for ya, Slick?

Vi

Click to expand...

ViRedd said:

tipsgnob said:

the economic structure of this country needs changing........what are you scared of old man?[/quote]

More agist insults from a brave, clueless, keyboard nerd, eh tips?

To answer your question though, I fear for young, blinded dunces like you who haven't a clue, who have no historical perspective to go on ... and who are voting themselves and their future generations into economic slavery.

Good enough answer for ya, Slick?

Vi

Click to expand...

wow pops...you sure put me in my place....

Click to expand...

ViRedd said:

No, what makes Obama a socialist is his desire to take from Peter to give to Paul.

If you'll open your mind a little, you'll see that we are progressing toward the type of socialism that is called fascism. Under fascism, unlike communism, government doesn't own the means of production, it just has strict dictatorial control over it. Witness what is happening with the takeover of the banks.

Obama isn't about setting the economy right, he's about changing the economic structure of the country. Obama is anti-capitalism and pro-socialism. He, and his cabinet are very scary people.

The next time a clue flies by, grab it quick so you'll have one.

Vi

Click to expand...