More Good News About Mother Earth

ginwilly said:

proof theory and logic problems can use the scientific method to achieve results.

To prove a hypothesis you will use scientific method.

Click to expand...

Pinworm said:

You seem bummed out that someone would actually stick up for one of their friends. Does it bum you out that none of your right winged tiny peckered friends will back your retarded dumminess?

Click to expand...

NoDrama said:

What you talking about? You think people's feelings would be hurt if you called them racist, or shit bag, or idiot, or moron, or testicle licker?

LOL no way dude.

Those are terms of endearment.

Click to expand...

UncleBuck said:

math is not a science. math is math.

Click to expand...

Pinworm said:

So, you are agreeing that those are terms that should be attributed with yourself and fatty fatty boombalatty / aka sheskank?

Click to expand...

NoDrama said:

oooo aren't we getting testy.

You seem to be taking some of this personally, you know I don't know how you got to feeling bad about all this, perhaps you and beaverboy should take a break from the internets for a while, go work on your grow or something useful. Cool off a bit, don't let some old geezer farmer like me rustle your jimmies so much.

Click to expand...

Pinworm said:

lol you said testy.

Click to expand...

NoDrama said:

Better than getting testes i suppose, unless you like rocky mountain style. I do.

Click to expand...

ginwilly said:

You are in the camp that believes that. I'm in the other camp that says math is a science.

But you being the genius math major, i should defer to you on this one I suppose.

Pythagoras wasn't scientific about his proof at all. Proof theory and mathematical logic are just figments of our imagination.

Click to expand...

Pinworm said:

Bigger the better. At least we have something in common.

Click to expand...

NoDrama said:

Im sure we have 10 million things in common and probabaly less than a handful of differences. really.

I don't really like Punk, but I haven't really ever listened to that much of it.

Click to expand...

UncleBuck said:

show me how you would run "2+2=4" through the scientific method.

Click to expand...

ginwilly said:

We wouldn't. Is that all math represents to a math major at ASU? 2 + 2?

Hilbert, Pythagoras, argotic theory, partial diff-eq, Reimann Zeta function (sp?) all used scientific methods.

Are you sure you really completed all of the math courses at ASU?

Oh wellz, good talk man.

It really is OK that you believe math is not a science and I do. Du Sautoy calls math "the queen of science". I'm perfectly comfortable being in his camp while you call us morons.

Click to expand...

UncleBuck said:

lol, someone googled his indefensible position to look for backup.

if you can't verify that "2+2=4" using the scientific method, then it's not science.

Click to expand...

UncleBuck said:

there is no such thing as scientific proof, only evidence.

and the evidence is overwhelming.

Click to expand...

Sand4x105 said:

Except.... when the evidence starts to evolve... as in Evolution Earth evolves, with or without humans help...
Your ego wont except that, 'cause you think we/us humans are so bad...and cause all the issues....

Earth is Evolving you can not stop this process... As the science evolves and good changes start to happen...
You will [if you live long enough] need to change your opinion... the facts.... the new evolved facts....
You can't handle the facts or good news.... why is that?.
You should change your Avatar to: "Debbie Downer"....
So....Keep your head in the sand.... below my feet.... yes we are laffing at ya....

Click to expand...