Obama Decides Cancer Treatment for Children is Non-Essential

ricky1lung

Well-Known Member
If it was your child you would want it.
Yes I would, but be reasonable here. It is experimental, It is not proven.

So, IMO only proven treatments should be covered, if I want an experimental treatment I should have to pay for it.
I know there is allot of waste in our system, (Mostly CEO and upper management) but until something is a proven
treatment it should not be covered under general care.

Why should you have to pay for a peroxide rub that someone needs funding to keep their research going.

I knew, when I posted there would be those who are against care for all coming to argue for care when it has not been proven.
An odd stance to take IMO.
You can't have it both ways.
 

ricky1lung

Well-Known Member
just like cannabinoids?-

for stroke victims?

Look, the bottom line is if people want to be covered build a system that allows everyone to be covered.
Don't complain that you have to pay into a system of coverage and then complain when someone does not
fall under the umbrella of coverage.

It is that simple.

Research is essential, experimental treatments are not until they are out of the experimental stage and have become proven treatments.

It is disturbingly funny to see people who will refuse to support a healthy lifestyle for millions of children start shouting Obama is killing babies because an experimental treatment is not deemed essential.
 

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
Yes I would, but be reasonable here. It is experimental, It is not proven.

So, IMO only proven treatments should be covered, if I want an experimental treatment I should have to pay for it.
I know there is allot of waste in our system, (Mostly CEO and upper management) but until something is a proven
treatment it should not be covered under general care.

Why should you have to pay for a peroxide rub that someone needs funding to keep their research going.

I knew, when I posted there would be those who are against care for all coming to argue for care when it has not been proven.
And odd stance to take IMO.
You can't have it both ways.

You can't have it both ways? Indeed.

Any compassionate program of "care" would not force people to participate under threat of force would it? You can't have it both ways.

The details of the plan get argued about, yet the WHETHER the program is morally acceptable in the way it is administered seems to be glossed over. Why?
 

ricky1lung

Well-Known Member
You can't have it both ways? Indeed.

Any compassionate program of "care" would not force people to participate under threat of force would it? You can't have it both ways.

The details of the plan get argued about, yet the WHETHER the program is morally acceptable in the way it is administered seems to be glossed over. Why?

Im not going to argue your underlying issue with taxes, we know you don't think you should have to pay in to cover your share
of services you receive, roads you travel, schools you have been educated in unless you choose to pay.

But you see, if the greater good was left in the hands of people who are of the same mind set as you are nothing would get built
or maintained.

Do you guys not see the level of hypocrisy in your posts?
 

Jimdamick

Well-Known Member
Well one thing is for certain they should not raise the debt limit.
If we cant tax enough to pay for things its time to do without things.
I don't live off of a credit card why should our government?
Somebody should have explained that to Bush, who as everyone knows started the downward spiral and ever growing debt of this nation.
 

Winter Woman

Well-Known Member
The problem as I see it is the interruption of studies on these experimental drugs. They may have to redo years or at least months of research and treatments to attain the needed information that might actually save a life.
 

ricky1lung

Well-Known Member
The problem as I see it is the interruption of studies on these experimental drugs. They may have to redo years or at least months of research and treatments to attain the needed information that might actually save a life.
Im positive that the doctors and scientists that are working on these treatments keep notes.
No, they will not have to redo their work, they will have to resume after funding runs out or find alternate funding.

They are not just tossing all progress in the trash because the gov shut down, do we even know if the research
has stopped?

Just because the shut down does not allow for experimental treatments to be deemed necessary does not mean the research ended.

:???:
 
I am so sick of listening to republicans blaming the president for shutting down vital necessities. like it or not, the affordable care act that was voted into law in 2010 n the majority of American people agreed when they re-elected president in 2012. And they will further agree in nov 2014 when republicans are voted out of the house.

The same Republicans in Congressional leadership today that combined to vote for a debt limit increase 19 times during the presidency of George W. Bush with no strings attached. In doing so, they increased the debt limit by nearly $4 trillion all for a war for a country with WMD's or Not!

Its t's about time the US takes care of its own!

Riddle me this? If money isn't backed by gold like the old days then where does it come from? Debt ceiling limit, I doubt it, we create money with the push of a button when we want!
 

cannabineer

Ursus marijanus
Look, the bottom line is if people want to be covered build a system that allows everyone to be covered.
Don't complain that you have to pay into a system of coverage and then complain when someone does not
fall under the umbrella of coverage.

It is that simple.

Research is essential, experimental treatments are not until they are out of the experimental stage and have become proven treatments.

It is disturbingly funny to see people who will refuse to support a healthy lifestyle for millions of children start shouting Obama is killing babies because an experimental treatment is not deemed essential.
The trouble with this is that insurers have a lot of say in what is "experimental". There is a conflict of interest here. Jmo.
 

ricky1lung

Well-Known Member
The trouble with this is that insurers have a lot of say in what is "experimental". There is a conflict of interest here. Jmo.
I agree that insurers have too much say, they are out for profits and are known to allow people to suffer or die so
they can increase those profits.

There needs to be a release of the strangle hold insurers have upon peoples health, the for profit privatization of healthcare needs to be reformed.
 

londonfog

Well-Known Member
I am so sick of listening to republicans blaming the president for shutting down vital necessities. like it or not, the affordable care act that was voted into law in 2010 n the majority of American people agreed when they re-elected president in 2012. And they will further agree in nov 2014 when republicans are voted out of the house.

The same Republicans in Congressional leadership today that combined to vote for a debt limit increase 19 times during the presidency of George W. Bush with no strings attached. In doing so, they increased the debt limit by nearly $4 trillion all for a war for a country with WMD's or Not!

Its t's about time the US takes care of its own!

Riddle me this? If money isn't backed by gold like the old days then where does it come from? Debt ceiling limit, I doubt it, we create money with the push of a button when we want!
Please stop making sense. RIU politics is no place for the truth.

Obama is a Kenyan Muslim who is funding the Muslim museum with his own money. He also hates babies and sometimes eat them for dinner. ahhhh much better now
 

Canna Sylvan

Well-Known Member
Yes I would, but be reasonable here. It is experimental, It is not proven.

So, IMO only proven treatments should be covered, if I want an experimental treatment I should have to pay for it.
I know there is allot of waste in our system, (Mostly CEO and upper management) but until something is a proven
treatment it should not be covered under general care.

Why should you have to pay for a peroxide rub that someone needs funding to keep their research going.

I knew, when I posted there would be those who are against care for all coming to argue for care when it has not been proven.
An odd stance to take IMO.
You can't have it both ways.
Wow you're an asshole. The One can do no wrong.
 

FreedomWorks

Well-Known Member
I am so sick of listening to republicans blaming the president for shutting down vital necessities. like it or not, the affordable care act that was voted into law in 2010 n the majority of American people agreed when they re-elected president in 2012. And they will further agree in nov 2014 when republicans are voted out of the house.
Democrats lost the House in 2010 BECASUE OF Obamacare....

John McCain, Mitch McConnell and other liberal republicans have been spewing out the same stupid argument as you have all week. So what the hell are you talking about? Obama, like a petulant little child better get his way, or he will take his ball and go home. If that wasn't bad enough, that shake down artist Obomber you love so much, is now shutting down the lot so that nobody with a ball can play. Amazingly finding resources to block and barricade anything he possibly can out of spite. How come every aspect of Obama's tax payer funded life is deemed essential? By HIM, and then for everybody else he decides its all non-essential? Is it because we have a narcissist in the white house?
 

Canna Sylvan

Well-Known Member
Just because The One wins a beauty contest, doesn't justify his actions. I didn't agree to his raping me. That's straight up populist thinking and a page out of the communist handbook.
 

londonfog

Well-Known Member
Just because The One wins a beauty contest, doesn't justify his actions. I didn't agree to his raping me. That's straight up populist thinking and a page out of the communist handbook.
Dude you seem to think everyone is raping you. OMG. The other day it was the police raping you for trying to find out what was wrong with a troubled screaming child. Give it a rest. You are not being raped. Maybe you have some secret hidden wants...just make sure you have a safety word... WORM-REAMER !!!!!!!!
 
Top