Oh Goodie! ... More on 911 (inside job) :)

Status
Not open for further replies.

fdd2blk

Well-Known Member
if your offended by my bumper sticker, your a cry baby

my first amendment applies, so fuck off

it's you're!!!!!!!


jesus fucking christ. :wall: :wall: :wall: :wall: :wall: :wall:


take the time to learn to fucking spell. it's about the only thing on this site that really pisses me off. you've got 911 figured the fuck out but you can't get past 3rd grade spelling. this is EXACTLY why you DIDN'T get the shit kicked out of you.
 
K

Keenly

Guest
it's you're!!!!!!!


jesus fucking christ. :wall: :wall: :wall: :wall: :wall: :wall:
QQ

i will type however i see fit, if you dont like it dont read it

oh look more missing 's might as well just forget about it because im not going to change the way a type because you dont like to see contractions missing the apostro
 
K

Keenly

Guest
He's learned nothing from the episode.... I'm not surprised at all.
i learned there are people out there who get angry at bumper stickers...

as if there was anything more useless and worthless to get angry about

apparently people have no other issues to be concerned about :roll:


if you get mad at some ones bumper sticker, you really need to get a life
 

fdd2blk

Well-Known Member
QQ

i will type however i see fit, if you dont like it dont read it

oh look more missing 's might as well just forget about it because im not going to change the way a type because you dont like to see contractions missing the apostro
dude, it's NOT just missing the apostrophe. it is misspelled and we have gone over this before. it is a DIRECT reflection of your intelligence. you seem to be incapable of learning simple things. :sad:
 

fdd2blk

Well-Known Member
i learned there are people out there who get angry at bumper stickers...

as if there was anything more useless and worthless to get angry about

apparently people have no other issues to be concerned about :roll:


if you get mad at some ones bumper sticker, you really need to get a life

as you mock his dead family. :roll:
 

"SICC"

Well-Known Member
Lol so since you don't got nothing to say, you just bash on people's typing, :lol:

that's just sad.

You should be putting CAPITALS when you start a sentence FDD, some intelligence you have :roll:

It's kinda pathetic if you ask me.
 

Big P

Well-Known Member
... so why bother ... I'm done with the stupid who want to disrupt this thread ... if they want to be stupid I certainly won't stand in their way ... and it doesn't bother me that they try to stand in the way of a real investigation ... the fact that they are stupid explains their behavior and makes them of no consequence of exposing the lies and reporting the FACTS ... so ignore them ... I certain intend to ... they are not even worth taking a good dump on ... now on to the 911 news.

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/30/nyregion/30trial.html?partner=rss&emc=rss

awsome grow rebel let me try to see if I can debunk you point by point

[URL="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/30/nyregion/30trial.html?partner=rss&emc=rss"]U.S. Drops Plan for a 9/11 Trial in New York City [/URL]
Why am I NOT surprised ...

they dropped the plans to do it in manhatten however they are still having it. its just that the american people in droves did not want it there it would have created 2000 police check points in manhatten for the duration of the trial as per the NYPD and many locals protested

ok?

[URL="http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2010/01/22/charges-withdrawn-military-commissions-sept-suspects/"]Charges Withdrawn in Military Commissions for Sept. 11 Suspects[/URL]
Charges against 9/11 suspects were dropped "without prejudice" -- a procedural move that allows federal officials to transfer the men to trial in a civilian court and also leaves the door open to again bringing charges in military commissions.
Webmaster's Commentary:
One has to wonder if these people will ever be brought up for trial at all, or will be held in indefinite incarceration without any trial.

the charges had to be dropped in order to allow them to try them in civillian court in NY

ok?


[URL="http://www.straitstimes.com/BreakingNews/SEAsia/Story/STIStory_480171.html"]9/11 was staged: Dr M
[/URL]
MALAYSIA'S former premier Mahathir Mohamad claimed the Sept 11, 2001 attacks in the United States, which killed nearly 3,000 people, were staged as an excuse to 'mount attacks on the Muslim world'.
Speaking at the General Conference for the Support of Al-Quds (Jerusalem) here, Tun Dr Mahathir said killing as an excuse for war is not new to the US. He also argued that Israel was created to solve the 'Jewish problem' in Europe, saying the Holocaust had failed as a final solution against the community.


typical muslim leader curring favour with his people, notice the reference to the holocaust,

typical anti semetic rant by muslim leader




[URL="http://www.bollyn.com/index.php#article_11656"]The Real Reason for the Cancellation of the 9-11 Trial [/URL]
The Obama administration will not have an open 9-11 trial because it would expose the fraud that the person said to be Khalid Sheik Mohammed is not the terror mastermind of 9-11. He is, in fact, not even Khalid Sheik Mohammed. The person said to be KSM is a "feeble-minded" man named Ahmed Abdul Qudoos. He has been scapegoated and made to fill in for the real KSM, who was killed in Pakistan.
Webmaster's Commentary:
Under torture Ahmed Abdul Qudoos confessed to being Khalid Sheik Mohammed, Lee Harvey Oswald, Judge Crater, Amelia Earhart, and Jack the Ripper!

they are still having the civilian trials your website is trying to lie to you and make you outraged





DEETS - audio interview part 1/6

[youtube]fckLLs_RdU4&feature=player_embedded[/youtube]
Dwain Deets - former NASA engineer - interview on REPUBLIC THEORY by Dallas Andrews and Warren Dyson.

dude are you kidding I sat throught that 9 min video and is says nothing, all it is, is that fucker talking about his credentials and how they are pushing for a new investigation!! lol

on top of that the person who started the so called Arcitects for 9/11 truth or whatever is so bias from the Sanfransico bay area, wow sounds like an objective group:shock:

wheres the beef GR?




[URL="http://americansjourney.blogspot.com/2010/01/video-building-7-reporter-byron-pitts.html"]Video: Building 7 Reporter Byron Pitts "Number of things don't add up."[/URL]
"It was the one calamity that was not a surprise..."

lol ok its a video about a reporter who thinks building 7 was a planned demolishion. This has already been proved incorrect in earlier posts many many times.

so instead of reposting it for the delusional.

let me just ask you one logical question which im sure you cannot answer.

if building 7 was demolished after the fact. WHY? WHY was it demolished???? if its truly a conspirosy whouldnt the 2 planes hitting the towers be enough? after all those trump the little building 7 doesnt it? why go to the trouble of flying planes into the big ones to make it look like a non inside job, but then just detonate the last smaller building thereby blowing thier cover

THINK!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!for once in you life!!!!

9/11 Truth In 9 Minutes
[youtube]x0K4GY7TK28&feature=player_embedded[/youtube]
Comparison videos of known high-rise steel structure fires of the Parque Central Tower Fire, Mandarin Hotel Fire, Windsor Tower Fire with the fires in the World Trade Center North Tower, South Tower and Building Seven. Videos of highlighted known controlled demolitions. Both top down and conventional demolitions.
You decide if the Official 9-11 Conspiracy Theory is true.


This is a pretty good video ... has some excellent comparisons of skyscrapers that burn much longer and hotter than the WTC and they didn't collapse ... been brought out before ... but the truth can't be brought out enough in this case ...

ok this video starts with buildings on fire and not collaping many were not huge fires some were very huge and burned for ever and did not collaple.

problem is they do not mention the many many building that have collapsed by fire (I wonder why) they also fail to mention that the fires in the world trade center also included thousands of pounds of jet fuel all of which entered the building and did not exit out the other side of the impact zone,

lastly they show controlled demolishions saying they look like the trade centers falling. lol but all of them were from the bottom where the collapse starts, but the world trade center collapes from the top,

so then they show some buildings in chinas that the detonated from the center. problem is the whole floor they demo from the center explodes out words in a very obvious manner

then they show the trade center collaposing but for some reason they dont show the collapse from when it started, they show it in mid fall and on top of that they slow down the video on that very part to make it look better for thier theory lol!!!


the last trade collapse they showed from the begining
though

but the collapses of the trade centers have way way way more dust pluming during the collapse then any of the other videos showing demolishions

the trade center was collapsing the upper floors which would get pulverised and begin colapsing the next floor below which in turn became pulverize cuasing the huge dust plumes during the collapse not after like they do in controlled demolitions

the controlled demos did not produce massive dust until they were totally collapse thats because only the middle floor that was rigged with explosives and that floor would blow huge dust the building would fall in one piece and only create plumes once it was hitting the ground, unlike the world trad center that was massivly pluming on the whole way down


Mechanical Engineer Derek Johnson "Engineering Destruction" part 1 - Ae911Truth
[youtube]142Ati4GEJQ&feature=player_embedded[/youtube]
Architects and Engineers for 9-11 Truth Presentation on WTC 7 controlled Demolition.

this is the same as above post about building seven why repeat??




[URL="http://www.bushstole04.com/911/standdown1.htm"]The 90-Minute Stand Down on 9/11: Why Was the Secret Service’s Early Request for Fighter Jets Ignored?[/URL]
The 90-Minute Stand Down on 9/11: Why Was the Secret Service’s Early Request for Fighter Jets Ignored?
Shortly after the second World Trade Center tower was hit, at 9:03 a.m. on September 11, 2001, an officer at Andrews Air Force Base, just outside Washington, DC, was notified that the Secret Service wanted fighter jets launched over the nation’s capital. It was now obvious the U.S. was under terrorist attack, and Washington would have been an obvious potential target. And yet the Secret Service’s request came to nothing.

it seems this may be true there may have been a huge delay before they scrambled the jets, BUT THERE IS ZERO EVIDENCE OF A STAND DOWN ORDER

could be incompitance of the new administration that they took until the pentagon was hit to get a fighter in the air. it took them 90 min to get then in the air i think when it should have taked about 25 min

bush was not even aware of the attack until the second plane hit the tower. Rumpheld was doing a speech at the pentagon and was unaware about these attacks until the pentagon itself was actually hit, and thats when he was put in the loop and ran out to help rescue survivers and this is where he stole a piece of the plane to keep

many people thought it was an accident when the first plane hit. it was not appearent it was an attack until the second plane hit

monday moring quarter back

[URL="http://www.bushstole04.com/911/videographer.htm"]9/11 FEMA Videographer at Ground Zero Goes Public
[/URL]
Kurt Sonnenfeld : Exclusive interview by Voltairenet
Source: Voltairenet.org
As official videographer for the U.S. government, Kurt Sonnenfeld was detailed to Ground Zero on September 11, 2001, where he spent one month filming 29 tapes: “What I saw at certain moments and in certain places … is very disturbing!”
“It was very odd to me when I learned that FEMA and several other federal agencies had already moved into position at their command center at Pier 92 on September 10th, one day before the attacks.”


OOOh lookie ... here's some more crazy people that want a real investigation ... imagine my lack of surprise ...

there has been an investigation and here is why they moved the command center to pear 92.

its because fema had set up there weeks before for a drill:

heres the sworn testimony from a former prosecuter:


FEMA in NYC prior to 9-11 for Project TRIPOD terror drill, scheduled for 9-12

As of this writing, June 2, 2004, the transcript of former New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani's testimony to the 9-11 Commission during the May 18-19, 2004 hearings in New York

"... the reason Pier 92 was selected as a command center was because on the next day, on September 12, Pier 92 was going to have a drill, it had hundreds of people here, from FEMA, from the Federal Government, from the State, from the State Emergency Management Office, and they were getting ready for a drill for biochemical attack. So that was gonna be the place they were going to have the drill. The equipment was already there, so we were able to establish a command center there, within three days, that was two and a half to three times bigger than the command center that we had lost at 7 World Trade Center. And it was from there that the rest of the search and rescue effort was completed."


Now dont you think all those fema people would have somthing to say if the above was not true, if they really were sent there on the 10th just to react to the 9/11 attacks,

use your brain!!!!!


[URL="http://world911truth.org/60-aerospace-engineers-call-for-a-new-911-investigation/"]60 Aerospace Engineers Call for a New 9/11 Investigation
[/URL]
As the number of verified architect and engineer petitioners at AE911Truth passes 1,000, the number describing themselves as aerospace engineers, or as engineers who have contributed professionally to the aerospace field, exceed sixty. These sixty-plus engineers were motivated to place their names on the public record as a matter of professional and social responsibility. While the skills necessary to conduct professional forensic analysis of destroyed buildings is largely distinct from those experienced in aerospace engineering, the basic physical laws involved in an analysis of the speed, symmetry, and energy input/output balance of the World Trade Center’s destruction involve only high school physics and chemistry, some lookups regarding the energy necessary to crush concrete, and basic arithmetic.
Of course the idiots in denial are far more intelligent than these engineers ... they know so much more ... :roll:

ok another repeat, i addressed this above


Here's a great video of a Japan Senator asking some tough questions about 911 ... and note that the minister doesn't have the answers except ... "that's what the US government told us" ... Also notice the pictures of the pentagon he shows to MP and ask "why is there no plane wreckage at the pentagon?

Japanese Senators ask the tough questions
you see the representatives of the Japanese people exercise their critical thinking skills in public - aware of bogus origins of the "War on Terror" (whatever that means)-aware that we've all just taken the word of some paid-for people - while ignoring real science. Must be nice to have a functioning government - anyway - take a peek.


great video, some random senator from japan asks who was behind 9/11 and the prime minister replies that after recieving intelligence form several sources and many different governments it is clear that this act was perpetrated by Al queda

David Ray Griffin at Boston University, Part 1 of 8

[youtube]lf5rTPuLDfM&feature=player_embedded#[/youtube]
David Ray Griffin's lecture at Boston University on April 11, 2009 (9/11, Time For a Second Look) . Dr. Griffin meticulously presents the case for a new investigation of the 9/11 attacks--the 9/11 Commission Report on the "official" conspiracy theory is full of contradictions and apparent lies. 1st. of 8 parts.

its clear how this university proffessor from liberal bostin University which i may add I have tripped balls and smoked mad weed in that university back in the day

but this is clearly a liberal bush hater proffessor with no new insite or bombshell evidence, just the same obvious bias many of the truthers have




its amazing grow rebel you try to throw out so much garbage and no one calls you on it cuz no one wants to sift through your bullshit


anyway I just debunked everysingle point of your post and to be honest I really did not think it would be this easy


how do you feel?


i dont have time for this shit. but I will be here to debunk every single post I can and will advise if i cannot debunk it:clap::hug::weed:


NEXT!!!!!
....................................................................
 

fdd2blk

Well-Known Member
[QUOTE="SICC";3737925]Lol so since you don't got nothing to say, you just bash on people's typing, :lol:

that's just sad.

You should be putting CAPITALS when you start a sentence FDD, some intelligence you have :roll:

It's kinda pathetic if you ask me.[/QUOTE]



"Lol so since you don't got nothing to say, you just bash on people's typing, :lol:"



:-|
 

Big P

Well-Known Member
there is something that happened to me last thursday that i havent shared yet, because frankly it scared the shit out of me


i had gotten off of work early so i decided to head to my friends house for a blunt


somebody followed me to my friends house, and when i parked and got out, he turned around and pulled up next to me


i thought he was going to ask for directions or some shit so i said whats up

he responds with "what the hell is your bumper sticker supposed to mean"

i said " exactly what it says "

" and what does that mean "

so i pointed out a random 9/11 fact that doesnt add up if you believe the official nonsense...

but the reason it was scary was because this guy was like "well my father died on 9/11" and he sounded pretty pissed, and the guy was huge, 250 easy, with arms like a roid user...

i was just thinking... please please please dont get out of the car

but anyway, he left after i convinced him to watch loose change, so yeah i was afraid that when i went back out to my car my window would be broken or tires slashed etc, but nope all good... and thats my story


damn man thats crazy. maybe the guys dad was a fireman of somthin

but yeah i had ordered this bumper sticker, but when it came down to it i decided not to put it on my bumper because although i think obama sucks, to some he is a symbol of black pride so i dont know i felt like kind of an asshole to do it even if it was funny

there are crazy people out there an i dont like to advertise to them. I even think its stupid when people put those signs on thier cars saying "Baby on Board"


im like why advertise to thousands of people that you have an infant in the car. Im sure som sick fucks will see you drive by. just better to be safe than sorry


wanna hear a crazy story, when my daughter was born i tried this trick to see if it would work i made a auction on ebay saying "its a gurl" and asking for donations. just to see if some people would actually help us out with donations

so I get this fucking email from a guy in singapore who said he is very interested and would pay and come pick up the "goods"

I was like WTF!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! scared the shit outa me, i took the auction down immidiatly.

that was bad:dunce:


here's the bumper sticker i wanted to put on my car:bigjoint:


 

Big P

Well-Known Member
that was pretty funny:lol: I didn't catch that at first..


You forgot to capitalize your sentence. You also have too many periods after the word first.



Heres my References::weed:
  1. ^ like this one
  2. ^ Robert Bringhurst (2005). The Elements of Typographic Style (version 3.1). Point Roberts, WA: Hartley and Marks. pp 68–69.
  3. ^ "Chapter 15: Footnotes, indexes, contents, and outlines". U.S. Government Printing Office Style Manual. http://www.gpoaccess.gov/stylemanual/browse.html. Retrieved January 23 2010.
  4. ^ "A Guide to Footnotes and Endnotes for NASA History Authors". NASA History Style Guide. http://history.nasa.gov/footnoteguide.html. Retrieved March 24 2005.
  5. ^ "Nelson HTML Preprocessor". http://nelsonhtml.com. Retrieved 2009-06-09.
  6. ^ "In Justice Breyer's Opinion, A Footnote Has No Place". The New York Times. 1995-07-28. http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=990CE1DC163EF93BA15754C0A963958260. Retrieved 2008-04-30.
  7. ^ See Indiana Courts – Footnotes in Legal Opinions
 

CrackerJax

New Member
By the way Keenly ... you absolutely have the right to your free speech.

Just be aware that all speech has it's own set of consequences.

Your sticker doesn't indicate a lot of tolerance, and yet you expect it from others.
 

Eternal

Well-Known Member
I don't see how you can honestly watch Blueprint for Truth, like honestly watch it without instantly discarding the info, and not think twice about 9/11. Simple physics that a 10 year old can grasp which show the 3 towers were brought down via controlled demolition.

How do you explain the fact that the buildings fell at free-fall speed, not just for a split second either. They also fell symmetrically straight down into their own footprint (except of course for the top section of the tower that fell sideways hitting wtc7, but still had enough downward force to cause the lower 80% of the building to fall symmetrically at free fall speeds, and causing horrible fires that eventually brought the wtc7 building down symmetrically at free fall speeds.

Then theres the visual evidence including squibs coming from the bands you can see around the building which just happen to be the most heavily reinforced parts of the towers (the towers are 3 buildings stacked ontop of eachother. The joint, aka sky-lobby, must obviously bear a very heavy load. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5EbsGZcl2jk&feature=related but nah those aren't squibs its the air pressure bro!

Honestly though you can't argue the points made in Blueprint for Truth. Then once it finally dawns on you non-truthers that 9/11 was controlled by the US federal government and military, you will look into other political conspiracy theories from ages ago and realize not only is it highly possible for a secret society to be in control or planning to become in control, but that there has been for much longer than one may think and they have been slowly, with the world their stage, enacting their script. Many people have been murdered for speaking out against secret societies and warning of the potential they have to gain full control.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top