Pandemic 2020

Status
Not open for further replies.

DIY-HP-LED

Well-Known Member
Fauci is 79. And still mentally sharp. I don't mind old people, I might not want to hire them to do something like roofing maybe, but just because someone is old doesn't mean that they are not mentally sharp.



In this election I prefer 50 years of evidence showing they are not a Russian puppet over someone younger but only a decade or so of time in office, which all coincides with the trolling of our democracy.
It's just like any other form of bigotry that pigeons holes people, people are individuals and must be respected as such. Age, young or old though can give us certain general attributes that are a normal part of life's journey. The bars are normally full of 20 and 30 something's, no too many 60 something's there on a friday night.
 

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
Dude i think they are all mentally inept due to old ducking age . Are you not listening . No disrespect, how the fuck I’m i off . These times have to be a
Case study for mental health issues and old age .
So, you'd pass laws that would deprive people their choices in voting to suit your own issues?

Yeah, that's not how it works. Try convincing people to vote for who you'd like. But yeah, what you propose is making yourself the ruler. It's ok for you to want that, don't get me wrong. But like most so-called Progressives, you are talking more like a banana republic's military dictator.
 

SpaceGrease

Well-Known Member
So, you'd pass laws that would deprive people their choices in voting to suit your own issues?

Yeah, that's not how it works. Try convincing people to vote for who you'd like. But yeah, what you propose is making yourself the ruler. It's ok for you to want that, don't get me wrong. But like most so-called Progressives, you are talking more like a banana republic's military dictator.
What ??? Ok cool ,you win !
 

schuylaar

Well-Known Member
Fauci is 79. And still mentally sharp. I don't mind old people, I might not want to hire them to do something like roofing maybe, but just because someone is old doesn't mean that they are not mentally sharp.



In this election I prefer 50 years of evidence showing they are not a Russian puppet over someone younger but only a decade or so of time in office, which all coincides with the trolling of our democracy.
just like trmpy* evidence..?
 

schuylaar

Well-Known Member
I dont understand, what would you like evidence of?
the difference between mental clarity and not at 79. there was plenty of evidence that he was not fit to serve and yet still handed over just as easy as you please- some of us had prior experience with bad babysittr and knows what it's all about..
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
the difference between mental clarity and not at 79. there was plenty of evidence that he was not fit to serve and yet still handed over just as easy as you please- some of us had prior experience with bad babysittr and knows what it's all about..
there is zero evidence of that. joe biden is fine.

youre an idiot amplifying trumps lies and propaganda, and you are too stupid to even know that is what you are doing
 

hanimmal

Well-Known Member
the difference between mental clarity and not at 79. there was plenty of evidence that he was not fit to serve and yet still handed over just as easy as you please- some of us had prior experience with bad babysittr and knows what it's all about..
A big one for Trump was he doesn't read and has no real want to learn anything, he knows it all.


https://www.apa.org/research/action/memory-changes
Screen Shot 2020-05-24 at 3.07.30 PM.png

It goes on, there are some changes,

Psychologists are building evidence for a consistent pattern of change. Episodic (what did I have for breakfast?), source (where did I learn about that new car?), and flashbulb (where where you on Sept. 11, 2001?) memory decline the most. Semantic (words, facts and concepts) and procedural ("it's like riding a bicycle - you never forget") memory decline the least. Storage capacity is not the issue; the brain is not an overloaded hard drive. Rather, the changes appear to come in how people encode and retrieve information. Interference, such as distraction, blocks encoding more and slower processing may hurt retrieval, such as being able to remember names and dates. Still, even with these subtle changes, most older adults still seem to efficiently acquire new information and park it in long-term memory. And implicit learning - learning without conscious effort - seems to more or less be spared into old age.
I am not worried about Biden screwing up names and misquoting dates of figures, and there is not any evidence that anyone is weekending at Bernies with him. So I am not too concerned about him being what 81? when we get to vote in the next President, especially with Trump as the alternative.
 

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
What ??? Ok cool ,you win !
So you first say older people should not be allowed to even run for office and now you just leave in a snit when somebody gives reasons why that's a bad idea.

Really, dude, you came here saying that people should be deprived of the right to run for an office on the basis of age. I didn't dive into the lack of reason behind that statement, I simply said that people have the ability and right to choose who to vote for whoever they please. We have those rights for good reasons.

I also make the observation that like you, Bernie Sanders has no issues with the kind of government banana republic dictators employ. I'm not much of a fan of restricting the rights of voters or placing irrational restrictions upon who can run.
 
Last edited:

DIY-HP-LED

Well-Known Member
A big one for Trump was he doesn't read and has no real want to learn anything, he knows it all.


https://www.apa.org/research/action/memory-changes
View attachment 4575307

It goes on, there are some changes,



I am not worried about Biden screwing up names and misquoting dates of figures, and there is not any evidence that anyone is weekending at Bernies with him. So I am not too concerned about him being what 81? when we get to vote in the next President, especially with Trump as the alternative.
Having a loving wife who happens to be a doctor helps too, time to resign Joe!
 

schuylaar

Well-Known Member
there is zero evidence of that. joe biden is fine.

youre an idiot amplifying trumps lies and propaganda, and you are too stupid to even know that is what you are doing
and you're an establishment hack.

'dog-faced pony soldier' fvcking ring any bells in there?

now that we have a raging pandemic and our country is in the shitter?
 

hanimmal

Well-Known Member
Having a loving wife who happens to be a doctor helps too, time to resign Joe!
Agreed, it really sucks that the the Russians started their attack on us to get Trump elected and the Republicans have let him leave us vulnerable because they benefit since he hijacked their 'base' voters.

I would have liked to have had Harris, but unfortunately the trolling using the 'squad' to drum up a bunch of racism and sexism makes too big of a gamble with how effective it was in 2016.
 

hanimmal

Well-Known Member
and you're an establishment hack.

'dog-faced pony soldier' fvcking ring any bells in there?

now that we have a raging pandemic and our country is in the shitter?

It is crazy how it updates quotes that are changed. When I posted it was in response to this:
Screen Shot 2020-05-24 at 4.16.08 PM.png

But it updated with the rest you put into it.
 

schuylaar

Well-Known Member
A big one for Trump was he doesn't read and has no real want to learn anything, he knows it all.


https://www.apa.org/research/action/memory-changes
View attachment 4575307

It goes on, there are some changes,



I am not worried about Biden screwing up names and misquoting dates of figures, and there is not any evidence that anyone is weekending at Bernies with him. So I am not too concerned about him being what 81? when we get to vote in the next President, especially with Trump as the alternative.
forget about sanders.

uncle joe is a gaffe machine and we could've had any one of MANY young accomplished candidates..the one that fit if you go by looks and fvckability (since that seems to entice you men here) would've easily been Eric Swalwell; Tim Ryan would've also been a better pick; it's just that our current money laden system of 'who can outspend the most'? is what easily and without any lube sent us to Hell in a Handbasket..
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top