Omgwtfbbq Indicaman
Well-Known Member
i bet, televangelists make alot of money roflmao.
"Fiat money" pun studiously avoided. cn
A new study produced by the Chronicle of Philanthropy shows that 14 out of the top 20 states in charitable giving are red, or Republican states, while 12 of the bottom 15 are blue, or Democrat states.
“The nation's sharp political divide can provide a clue to fundraisers,” writes The Chronicle. “The eight states that ranked highest in The Chronicle's analysis voted for John McCain in the last presidential contest while the seven lowest-ranking states supported Barack Obama.”
The study also found that the more religious states- which also happen to be more Republican- tend to give more than the less religious states.
But wait.
No, no, no: This can’t mean what we think it means.
It can’t mean that liberals are just cheaper than conservatives, despite outward appearances.
We need to cue the liberal social scientist whose job it is to explain to us that the results of the study don’t really say what they say.
Umm read what I originally wrote, on post #38. I never brought up Obama, it was Freedom I was quoting who did. I bought up bother's keeper to highlight liberal philosophy, which I oppose. Freedom thought I wanted everyone to live like Obama's brother because of my nature comments. So I was being a smart ass like Cain.
Obama wants to take credit for bailing out Chrysler, but 55% of the company is owned by Fiat. So isn't that like bailing out Italy?
Since most of Chrysler's manufacturing and production takes place in America, No. He was bailing out the American workers, and rightfully so. But besides keeping Americans employed, it also props up the other stores and shops in the town where the plants are, even if they aren't connected to the supply lines or retail outlets. And it also props up the suppliers and retailers all across America. And the towns they are in, round and round it goes. Its economics 101. Also, while Fiat is based in Italy, its largely a multinational corporation. So to say its bailing out Italy is grossly misleading. It's the American workers in the auto industry that we "bailed out".
You're a fucking idiot. And what you just posted goes way beyond misleading. Liberals like to pull out half truths from the stories you like, while ignoring key important details. And you're about 2 days late on the reply. Was that just enough time for you to gather up some liberal talking points?
Oh and by the way Freedomworks, I'm going to dinner now, So even if I don't get to check the forum tonight, tomorrow or the day after- guess what? You're still wrong and I'll be sure to point that out for the users here at RIU. Because spreading false and misleading statements does nothing for anybody here except for misinforming people, and I'm sure most people here are to learn and share ideas and truths.
#1. They would be facts... And I know they are stubborn. #2. Everything I said was very generalized facts about economics. #3. It seems as though you think I looked up facts or talking points- That proves you know nothing about economics because they are VERY GENERAL concepts of economics. Nothing needed to look up to fact check those if you knew the slightest idea of how an economy works. #4. Calling me a f*cking idiot seems as though you are mad because I just corrected you. And by the way you are acting, you would think I destroyed you. I was just correcting you, not calling you a "fuc*ing idiot" so chill. Lets have a constructive conversation. Don't be scared, they don't bite. And if you're wrong, gues what? You learned! At the very least you saw another point of view. #5. What do you mean "Liberal talking points"?? You must mean my facts right?....#1 You're not a liberal social scientist #2 You are a fucking idiot #3 From what I've seen, having a constructive conversation on the facts is the last thing liberals want to do. #3 You have no clue how wealth is created
but saying you're liberal or conservative or whatever isn't a bad thing! It's a set of beliefs!