PROOF That Ron Paul is a RACIST!!!

UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
GodSlave said:
Actually, I think ALL the republican candidates have something good to say...
Click to expand...


"I find it interesting that it was back in the 1970s that the swine flu broke out then under another Democrat president Jimmy Carter. And I'm not blaming this on President Obama, I just think it's an interesting coincidence."



"I am only going to allow small bills — three pages. You’ll have time to read that one over the dinner table"



"...right to privacy…doesn't exist in my opinion in the United States Constitution."



"Any Ad Which Quotes What I Said On Sunday Is A Falsehood"



"George W. Bush did a incredible job in the presidency, defending us from freedom."



"I'm not a big-game hunter. I've made that very clear. I've always been a rodent and rabbit hunter. Small varmints, if you will."



"Boy, it sure burns me to have a national holiday for Martin Luther King. I voted against this outrage time and time again as a Congressman. What an infamy that Ronald Reagan approved it! We can thank him for our annual Hate Whitey Day."
 
PushForKush

PushForKush

Active Member
UncleBuck said:


"I find it interesting that it was back in the 1970s that the swine flu broke out then under another Democrat president Jimmy Carter. And I'm not blaming this on President Obama, I just think it's an interesting coincidence."



"I am only going to allow small bills — three pages. You’ll have time to read that one over the dinner table"



"...right to privacy…doesn't exist in my opinion in the United States Constitution."



"Any Ad Which Quotes What I Said On Sunday Is A Falsehood"



"George W. Bush did a incredible job in the presidency, defending us from freedom."



"I'm not a big-game hunter. I've made that very clear. I've always been a rodent and rabbit hunter. Small varmints, if you will."



"Boy, it sure burns me to have a national holiday for Martin Luther King. I voted against this outrage time and time again as a Congressman. What an infamy that Ronald Reagan approved it! We can thank him for our annual Hate Whitey Day."
Click to expand...
I could be wrong, but I'm pretty sure he actually did vote for the MLK holiday. That quote was in his newsletter right?
 
GodSlave

GodSlave

Active Member
UncleBuck said:


"I find it interesting that it was back in the 1970s that the swine flu broke out then under another Democrat president Jimmy Carter. And I'm not blaming this on President Obama, I just think it's an interesting coincidence."



"I am only going to allow small bills — three pages. You’ll have time to read that one over the dinner table"



"...right to privacy…doesn't exist in my opinion in the United States Constitution."



"Any Ad Which Quotes What I Said On Sunday Is A Falsehood"



"George W. Bush did a incredible job in the presidency, defending us from freedom."



"I'm not a big-game hunter. I've made that very clear. I've always been a rodent and rabbit hunter. Small varmints, if you will."



"Boy, it sure burns me to have a national holiday for Martin Luther King. I voted against this outrage time and time again as a Congressman. What an infamy that Ronald Reagan approved it! We can thank him for our annual Hate Whitey Day."
Click to expand...
I said they all have SOMETHING good to say, I didn't say EVERYTHING they say... I could bring up a whole host of things king moron has said, or things his dimwit sidekick Biden has gaffed all over the place. So what's your point?
 
cerberus

cerberus

Well-Known Member
GodSlave said:
You libtards will grasp at anything...
Click to expand...
this from a guyy that said he supports cain.. you know cains 9-9-9 plan is almost identical to the simcity tax plan right? talk about grasping at anything..

and for the record, my avatar of firearm supressors should give you a small indication I aint no liberal.
 
GodSlave

GodSlave

Active Member
cerberus said:
this from a guyy that said he supports cain.. you know cains 9-9-9 plan is almost identical to the simcity tax plan right? talk about grasping at anything..

and for the record, my avatar of firearm supressors should give you a small indication I aint no liberal.
Click to expand...
Hey whatever, I've read the plan, I think it would work... And I was responding to his attack about the eyebrows, I wasn't even talking to you.
 
cerberus

cerberus

Well-Known Member
GodSlave said:
Hey whatever, I've read the plan, I think it would work... And I was responding to his attack about the eyebrows, I wasn't even talking to you.
Click to expand...
well I'm talking to you, welcome to a public forum. and you have Reagan as your avatar, so from one fiscal conservative to another, WTF!? The tax system is completely fucked up, thats not a liberal analyst, REAGAN's own economic advisor has said so.. Cain is selling books brother, hes not a real canidate.. If your gonna support an outsider, Ron Paul or this guy ROEMER.. But not a dude trying to sell books, he is for the fed reserve, he likes greenspan (since he worked for him).. come on man, he aint no fiscal conservative.. he is for exapnding the war in Iraq even.. Cain is a joke

 
GodSlave

GodSlave

Active Member
cerberus said:
well I'm talking to you, welcome to a public forum. and you have Reagan as your avatar, so from one fiscal conservative to another, WTF!? The tax system is completely fucked up, thats not a liberal analyst, REAGAN's own economic advisor has said so.. Cain is selling books brother, hes not a real canidate.. If your gonna support an outsider, Ron Paul or this guy ROEMER.. But not a dude trying to sell books, he is for the fed reserve, he likes greenspan (since he worked for him).. come on man, he aint no fiscal conservative.. he is for exapnding the war in Iraq even.. Cain is a joke
Click to expand...
Look man, I'm a Paul supporter all the way, as I mentioned way back in the beginning. If we weren't on a pot forum, I would let you see my facebook and you would see. I have his restore America banner across the top of my page and I frequently post news items and videos about him.
But anyways, I understand the tax code is messed up, that's why I am in favor of a fair tax, which is essentially what the 999 is...kind of. And he has said it is just the beginning and will move toward a more traditional fair tax, but this is a start.
I am only moving part of my support because I don't believe Paul has a chance, and if he is not in it, then I must make another choice about who to vote for. Right now, I like Cain. But I also like Newt. And sometimes Santorum makes sense. It's all up for grabs right now and who knows what is going to happen. These 2 things I do know: 1. Obama must go. 2. I will not support Perry. Beyond that, I am still undecided.
And just to clarify again... I support Ron Paul first and foremost. Cain, or anyone else, is just a backup plan so to speak.

So who, other than Paul, do you support?

I will definitely look into your claims about Cain, but I'm not convinced he is just trying to sell books. You could say that of most of the candidates couldn't you?

And why are you being so hostile? I understand it's a public forum, duh! It seemed as you were attacking me, for attacking him, for attacking Paul????????? Hence the "I wasn't talking to you" comment.....
GS :leaf:
 
M

Morgan Lynn

Active Member
GodSlave said:
Yeah, and let the ones do it who can do the job right, the private sector, because in case you haven't noticed, the public sector ain't doing so good running the school system...
Click to expand...
Do you under-fucking-stand how AWFUL it would be if we didn't have public schools?

Do you know how many fucking children wouldn't have ANY education?

The public school system carries more than half of the students in this country.

FUCK!
 
GodSlave

GodSlave

Active Member
Morgan Lynn said:
Do you under-fucking-stand how AWFUL it would be if we didn't have public schools?

Do you know how many fucking children wouldn't have ANY education?

The public school system carries more than half of the students in this country.

FUCK!
Click to expand...
Wow.
I'm sorry, but you are misguided. We do not need public run schools, or at the very least, we do not need FEDERALLY run schools. There is no provision in the constitution for the Dept of Education, sorry.
You should not have to go to a certain school just because you move into a certain neighborhood. It should be a choice. It should be run by the private sector, and be overseen by the state. The Dept' of Education must go.
Let me ask if YOU understand something... The govt. can't run anything right, just look at the USPS, and then contrast it with UPS or FedEx. Look at the VA, and then contrast it with civilian health care. Look at Social Security, then contrast it with other private sector investment firms. Seriously, can you not see the fed govt has no business being in business? Everything they touch is a giant failure. All the alphabets need to go, they are a huge pile of corruption and monetary waste... USDE, USDA, IRS, etc, etc.
Here's a fact for ya in closing... Take a look at the USDA. When it started, there were something like 1,000 workers and 10 million farmers. Now there are something like 100,000 workers and 1 million farmers. Do you see a problem with that?

GS :leaf:
 
M

Morgan Lynn

Active Member
I'm just saying, my son's grandmother is a public school Latin teacher in Maryland. Actually, she is head of the Latin Department at her school. She loves her job and loves being a teacher in a public school. Private schools are very competitive. That means if your kids need a school, they will be competing for a spot in every school they choose. Some children are just not as quick as other students. What about the mentally handicapped students? Some of these special students only have a public school they can attend. The mentally handicapped are frequently rejected from private schools because they lack the essentials to facilitate their educational needs. Suggesting that mentally handicapped students should only attend schools for the mentally handicapped is like saying blacks can't go to school with whites. SO, when I think of public schools I think of equality and fairness. Private schools are reserved for people who can AFFORD it or people who are above average intelligence.

In my opinion, schools should remain public for the public. Private schools will always be an option and available to people if they qualify.



You can choose where you go to school... it's called moving. If you live in an area where you hate the schools why live there? The reason schools have a districting system is so they don't over populate and under populate schools.

Baltimore has a huge problem with their school attendances and it causes them to lose a shit load of funding. If schools were privatized there would be NO schools for any of these students to go to. They ones that DO go to school would be shut out of luck. Is that fair to them?
 
GodSlave

GodSlave

Active Member
Morgan Lynn said:
I'm just saying, my son's grandmother is a public school Latin teacher in Maryland. Actually, she is head of the Latin Department at her school. She loves her job and loves being a teacher in a public school. Private schools are very competitive. That means if your kids need a school, they will be competing for a spot in every school they choose. Some children are just not as quick as other students. What about the mentally handicapped students? Some of these special students only have a public school they can attend. The mentally handicapped are frequently rejected from private schools because they lack the essentials to facilitate their educational needs. Suggesting that mentally handicapped students should only attend schools for the mentally handicapped is like saying blacks can't go to school with whites. SO, when I think of public schools I think of equality and fairness. Private schools are reserved for people who can AFFORD it or people who are above average intelligence.

In my opinion, schools should remain public for the public. Private schools will always be an option and available to people if they qualify.
Click to expand...
I understand where you are coming from, but I think it's the term "private" that is getting mixed up. I understand what private schools mean right now, but what I am talking about is the private sector taking over the schools. It could be framed for use with vouchers, sort of like pell grants are now for college students. Newt Gingrich has some good ideas about vouchers and the concept I am talking about.
What I am suggesting is a quality run school system, run by the private sector, with choice for all parents. Like I said, there is no reason why you should have to go to a certain school because you live in a certain neighborhood. The private sector brings on competition, which breeds higher standards and quality. Where as public sector schools don't have to be held to that standard because students go to the school where they live...no competition. It's how the free market works actually, consumers are the ones who determine what companies live or die, based on the companies performance.
So anyways, I think if you step away from the term "private" and think more "private sector", and then study the free market, you will understand why I am saying the private sector could make a school system for ALL students that is tops in the world.
As for dealing with mentally handicapped, or any other type of disability, I do not find it offensive to have a special school for them. It's not demeaning to have a state of the art facility, with specialized teachers, in a fun environment with other disabled children. What's so wrong with that? Traditionally blind people have gone to special schools for the blind, right? Through the private sector, things like state of the art learning could happen.
We've already tried throwing tons of money at schools, and it didn't work. The answer is not money, it's RESPONSIBLE spending of that money.

GS :leaf:
 
RollMeOne420

RollMeOne420

Active Member
lmao im surprised the supporters of ron paul haven't jumped all over this thread and spread their propaganda already. Where are they with their nice signature stickers?
 
M

Morgan Lynn

Active Member
GodSlave said:
I understand where you are coming from, but I think it's the term "private" that is getting mixed up. I understand what private schools mean right now, but what I am talking about is the private sector taking over the schools. It could be framed for use with vouchers, sort of like pell grants are now for college students. Newt Gingrich has some good ideas about vouchers and the concept I am talking about.
What I am suggesting is a quality run school system, run by the private sector, with choice for all parents. Like I said, there is no reason why you should have to go to a certain school because you live in a certain neighborhood. The private sector brings on competition, which breeds higher standards and quality. Where as public sector schools don't have to be held to that standard because students go to the school where they live...no competition. It's how the free market works actually, consumers are the ones who determine what companies live or die, based on the companies performance.
So anyways, I think if you step away from the term "private" and think more "private sector", and then study the free market, you will understand why I am saying the private sector could make a school system for ALL students that is tops in the world.
As for dealing with mentally handicapped, or any other type of disability, I do not find it offensive to have a special school for them. It's not demeaning to have a state of the art facility, with specialized teachers, in a fun environment with other disabled children. What's so wrong with that? Traditionally blind people have gone to special schools for the blind, right? Through the private sector, things like state of the art learning could happen.
We've already tried throwing tons of money at schools, and it didn't work. The answer is not money, it's RESPONSIBLE spending of that money.

GS :leaf:
Click to expand...
Where I live we have a special needs school. I do NOT agree that all handicapped students need to attend a handicapped school. That is not fair. It's up to the parents and student to decide if a private, public, or a specialized school is better or not. I understand your position. Yes, traditionally blind students attend schools for the blind but not anymore. I had a blind Latin teacher when I went to highschool. He had his dog and did his own thing very well.

What I'm trying to say is that everyone has the right to go to school. Whether it is private, public, or a specialized school.
 
ganjames

ganjames

Well-Known Member
I've been to many schools growing up when we moved around a lot, and the mentally challenged kids always got one little room in the school where they stayed the entire day. how is that not demeaning? kids are little assholes and these special needs kids would be fucked with on a daily basis, they should have their own place to be in an actual school enviormet like the non special needs children.
 
M

Morgan Lynn

Active Member
ganjames said:
I've been to many schools growing up when we moved around a lot, and the mentally challenged kids always got one little room in the school where they stayed the entire day. how is that not demeaning? kids are little assholes and these special needs kids would be fucked with on a daily basis, they should have their own place to be in an actual school enviormet like the non special needs children.
Click to expand...
You're not understanding what I'm saying.

AND what the hell are you talking about. Mentally challanged students can attend regular classes. They are not confined to small rooms like dogs. They have special education teachers who accompany them in all their endeavors. When the mentally sound to mentally retarded ratio is 50 to 1 there tends to be more classrooms for the higher population of students. I have NEVER in all the schools I have attended seen mentally challanged students confined to one room.
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
GodSlave said:
I will definitely look into your claims about Cain...
Click to expand...
now you have clearly exposed yourself as a low information voter.

cain was just on meet the press talking about how he would expand our role in iraq. how can you support that and claim to be a ron paul fan at the same time?

cain was a former chairman of the kansas city fed and has said that the fed does not even need to be audited. how can you support that and claim to be a ron paul fan at the same time?

i have no problem with people like cerebrus that support ron paul, but i have noticed a lot of his supporters are very low information types like yourself. you make the rest of his supporters look worse by proxy.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top