smaller return like 1/2 or 3/4 - as you don't want to outrun your recirc flow....
This is a common misconception (and I understand why).
If the return line was purely gravity fed then pipe diameter would make a difference. But as you'll be using a pump to control this flow it is independent of pipe diameter (unless you're restricting things with a tiny, tiny pipe).
To understand this better ask yourself: which scenario provides more flow, pumping 1 GPM in a 1″ pipe or 1 GPM in a 2” pipe? Well 1 GPM is still 1 GPM regardless of the pipe size!
So really you want as big as a pipe as possible (to stop root blockage) with a correctly sized pump (which controls flow).
Undercurrent seems to be a popular method used by many with much success. What, in your opinion, makes it "stupid" and "sub-par?"make the min size the inlet of pump. If you want restriction use a smaller pump or a ball valve.
But I think undercurrent is dumb. Why mimic something sub-par?
- Jiji
make the min size the inlet of pump. If you want restriction use a smaller pump or a ball valve.
But I think undercurrent is dumb. Why mimic something sub-par?
- Jiji
sub-par? your so misinformed but to each his own.
Undercurrent seems to be a popular method used by many with much success. What, in your opinion, makes it "stupid" and "sub-par?"
I miss quoted you. You said dumb which isn't much different I guess...I didn't say stupid, I just said sub-par.
I say the same thing about stinkbuds aero setup.
People don't like it when I say that but just trying to help.
- Jiji
Edit- because well basically its sub-par lol. The best growing site in the whole undercurrent setup is the epicenter. Except you don't actually grow in that location lol. And to try to makeup for that fact you have to run an airpump(s) and airstones.
I miss quoted you. You said dumb which isn't much different I guess...
As far as being sub par, everything I've seen and heard thus far contradicts you, but I'll humor you. What is the superior growing method in your opinion?
Thats some serious plumbing going on in there.LOL - one more for you to "grow" on...... such a parody.... TA TA!
View attachment 3693652 View attachment 3693653
Beginners use Electronically actuated ball valves & fertigation .......... now slap yourself on the back for being smart, lmao.
This is a common misconception (and I understand why).
If the return line was purely gravity fed then pipe diameter would make a difference. But as you'll be using a pump to control this flow it is independent of pipe diameter (unless you're restricting things with a tiny, tiny pipe).
To understand this better ask yourself: which scenario provides more flow, pumping 1 GPM in a 1″ pipe or 1 GPM in a 2” pipe? Well 1 GPM is still 1 GPM regardless of the pipe size!
So really you want as big as a pipe as possible (to stop root blockage) with a correctly sized pump (which controls flow).
make the min size the inlet of pump. If you want restriction use a smaller pump or a ball valve.
But I think undercurrent is dumb. Why mimic something sub-par?
- Jiji
I didn't say stupid, I just said sub-par.
I say the same thing about stinkbuds aero setup.
People don't like it when I say that but just trying to help.
- Jiji
Edit- because well basically its sub-par lol. The best growing site in the whole undercurrent setup is the epicenter. Except you don't actually grow in that location lol. And to try to makeup for that fact you have to run an airpump(s) and airstones.
Thats some serious plumbing going on in there.
I agree. I use submersible with a chiller. Pump in the res to supply waterfalls to buckets. Gravity returns the water to the res.make the min size the inlet of pump. If you want restriction use a smaller pump or a ball valve.
But I think undercurrent is dumb. Why mimic something sub-par?
- Jiji