Stress+Recovery time=Better yield & potency

Pwezzy said:

Like I said no response on page 1-4 was hostile and you keep saying something about page one that was in the first post, has nothing to do with getting defensive with y'all. Like I said nobody admitted that these was even claims at all and that they tried them until after they got done having a comedy show about my thread

Click to expand...

Pwezzy said:

Like I said no response on page 1-4 was hostile and you keep saying something about page one that was in the first post, has nothing to do with getting defensive with y'all. Like I said nobody admitted that these was even claims at all and that they tried them until after they got done having a comedy show about my thread

Click to expand...

Somatek said:

Is that "that" somehow a response to your avoiding addressing that someone pointed out on page 1 you were wrong without being confrontational? If that that is your answer, well then I reply with;

The ducks of new south wales are the most delightful colour, like that of a buttermilk sky covered in static from a dead channel speaking to me elegantly of feathers unplucked by geese of yore. Their quacks of divine rage echoing across the bossom lot of nurgles palace while Morloch demon prince of Azgon defiles the yellow fungi of saturn.

Is deflecting each others reply with nonsensical gibberish fun for you? Everytime you avoid/deflect from answering I'll write you a longer & longer random gibberish, literally just throwing out words I've heard at some point without thinking about forming a sentence. That seems to be your style, maybe we'll connect at some point & start to actually communicate. At this point it's literally insane to rationally argue so why not throw sanity to the wind.

Click to expand...

Somatek said:

Seriously? I pulled up a post from page 1 that says stress free is the best way to increase yield & potency, which you've ignored then & still ignore now. Instead fixated on how topping is stress, so your right (when that's clearly wrong).

Now you're saying that there is no post from page 1-4....

Ok, we just went through this but here we go again...

Click to expand...

rkymtnman said:

stress=less than ideal conditions. why would you do that?
ideal conditions=ideal plant

Click to expand...

Pwezzy said:

Dude that was my post to make the thread you not making no point.

Click to expand...

Pwezzy said:

Dude that was my post to make the thread you not making no point.

Click to expand...

Pwezzy said:

Dude that was my post to make the thread you not making no point.

Click to expand...

charface said:

Speak english.

Click to expand...

Gary Goodson said:

Stfu already, dingle dick.

Click to expand...

Somatek said:

Seriously? I pulled up a post from page 1 that says stress free is the best way to increase yield & potency, which you've ignored then & still ignore now. Instead fixated on how topping is stress, so your right (when that's clearly wrong).

Now you're saying that there is no post from page 1-4....

Ok, we just went through this but here we go again...

Click to expand...

Somatek said:

This is from page 1. I understand it to say "plants grow the best when they're in a stress free enviro". What do you understand it to say? I deleted a line at the bottom so it doesn't distract you. This is simple, explain what Rkymtnma was telling you.

It's clear to me he's saying "stress free enviro produce the best plants", it didn't take 30-35 pages for someone to say it non-confrontationally. It took less then one IF YOUR WERE LISTENING

Click to expand...

Somatek said:

We're well past english, gibberish may be more effective but I doubt it. Anyone know klingon?

Click to expand...

Pwezzy said:

Dude that was my post to make the thread you not making no point.

Click to expand...

Pwezzy said:

Dude that was my post to make the thread you not making no point.

Click to expand...

Somatek said:

We all know, I also copied how someone answered that question but you dismissed it. I understood enough to get what he was saying, you still haven't explained what you think he meant in the reply I've copied twice now.

Click to expand...

Pwezzy said:

Like I said

And I responded none confrontational to the post. Go back and look

Click to expand...

Somatek said:

Stop evading, the first time I brought his post up (where I broke it down why you were wrong for each point) you fixated on how you still think LST increases potency. Now you're deflecting again instead of answering my question. So I'll ask again clearly & directly:

What was Rkymtnma saying, use your words to make his point. I clearly understood it to mean that a stress free enviro causes bigger/more potent plants. You still deny that anyone said that on page 1. So if you don't understand his post to mean that, what does it mean? Not what's your reply, why's he wrong. Nothing like that. Rephrase his comment in your own words to show you understand what he meant to say. This is a standard exercise in conflict resolution, before replying you state what the person said in your own words to show you listening & understand. You have not shown that you are listening, so please just rephrase his comment to show you understand what he was saying.

Click to expand...

PuffinPine said:

Did anybody stop and think poor Pwezzy might be a high functioning asp... ah never mind. It doesn’t matter. He’s cool lol.

Click to expand...