the 2020 democratic candidate (and VP)

2020?

  • kamala harris

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • cory booker

    Votes: 6 33.3%

  • julian castro

    Votes: 1 5.6%

  • john hickenlooper

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • tim ryan

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • elizabeth warren

    Votes: 11 61.1%

  • sherrod brown

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • kirsten gillibrand

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • tim kaine

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • chris murphy

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Total voters
    18
SneekyNinja

SneekyNinja

Well-Known Member
Justin-case said:
Please explain....
the election is over there are no more Hillary "supporters" her campaign is done.
Click to expand...
I think he's referring to the people who think the person with 2.6mill more votes should've won.

It disgusts me to say it, but if Trump won the vote by 2.6mill votes (but lost the presidency) I'd be reluctantly saying he should have won.
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
ttystikk said:
if you don't like the outcome, maybe it's because your candidate sucked.
Click to expand...
when are the bernie bros gonna realize that this applies more to their candidate than it does to hillary?

hillary won as many votes as obama did, and trounced bernie by nearly 4 million. a full 12% in the primary popular vote.
 
st0wandgrow

st0wandgrow

Well-Known Member
UncleBuck said:
when are the bernie bros gonna realize that this applies more to their candidate than it does to hillary?

hillary won as many votes as obama did, and trounced bernie by nearly 4 million. a full 12% in the primary popular vote.
Click to expand...
The primary and the general election were similar in that there were outside influences that factored in. The DNC colluded against Bernie, and Putin/wiki leaks/Comey did the same to Hillary.

There's no way to quantify exactly how much impact either had, but it's wrong none the less.

I will admit that the 3 million votes that Bernie lost by is a big number, and I doubt that he could have over come that had the DNC remained neutral, but it still chaps my ass.
 
Justin-case

Justin-case

Well-Known Member
st0wandgrow said:
Guys discuss sex, beating off, etc all of the time and aren't chastised for it. I don't see any issue with a woman who feels comfortable talking about it too.

I agree with most of what you stand for, and I see no issue with ripping pie and others on their beliefs...but I will never understand why it has to go beyond that in to personal attacks? I don't imagine you talk to people like that in person, so why do it here?
Click to expand...

In a debate if it pertains to the subject, someone's character is fair game. You seem to forget that none of it is slander.
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
st0wandgrow said:
The primary and the general election were similar in that there were outside influences that factored in. The DNC colluded against Bernie, and Putin/wiki leaks/Comey did the same to Hillary.

There's no way to quantify exactly how much impact either had, but it's wrong none the less.

I will admit that the 3 million votes that Bernie lost by is a big number, and I doubt that he could have over come that had the DNC remained neutral, but it still chaps my ass.
Click to expand...
remember, that margin of nearly 4 million was done without running a single negative ad against bernie, or dragging out any of the oppo research against him.
 
Justin-case

Justin-case

Well-Known Member
st0wandgrow said:
How does pie "looking like a little boy" or rosey being "fat and ugly" pertain to political debates??
Click to expand...

Simple, pie posted a fake story about pedophilia, even after the pizza parlor is shot up by crazed gunman she still insist it's real. So for me to suggest that her husband might be attracted to young boys, judging by pics posted of her is not out of the question. And speaking of personal attacks I would suggest you reread your little melt down in the blm thread the other day.
 
Justin-case

Justin-case

Well-Known Member
st0wandgrow said:
How does pie "looking like a little boy" or rosey being "fat and ugly" pertain to political debates??
Click to expand...

Oops forgot fat bastard rosey peach, Jesus what a heffer huh. It's hard to tell where her head ends and her body begins, lol. Again her pic and she is real special case, she believes that even though she has been well fed by goverment assistance, that the system is slanted to help minorities. I forget the exact quote, it was puke worthy. I'll bet if we ask @UncleBuck real nice he can post it:-)
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Justin-case said:
Oops forgot fat bastard rosey peach, Jesus what a heffer huh. It's hard to tell where her head ends and her body begins, lol. Again her pic and she is real special case, she believes that even though she has been well fed by goverment assistance, that the system is slanted to help minorities. I forget the exact quote, it was puke worthy. I'll bet if we ask @UncleBuck real nice he can post it:-)
Click to expand...
since you asked nicely:

roseypeach said:
There should be a time limit on how long one can receive anything and these programs they have now are catering to minorities so if you're single, white and male with no dependents, you can forget the system looking out for you. Those are the guys footing the bill these days.

EDIT: Single white males either have to get married or impregnate someone to catch a break and then it's up to the women they hook up with whether or not it works out for them. Divorce rates, child support payments, etc. are putting them all in the poor house.

They can't afford to carry the minorities anymore and are finding themselves a minority with no voice.
Click to expand...
racist as fuck. wouldn't you agree, @Flaming Pie ?

after all, you're white and have had no problem staying on free healthcare and food stamps for a fucking decade.
 
Fogdog

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
Justin-case said:
Oops forgot fat bastard rosey peach, Jesus what a heffer huh. It's hard to tell where her head ends and her body begins, lol. Again her pic and she is real special case, she believes that even though she has been well fed by goverment assistance, that the system is slanted to help minorities. I forget the exact quote, it was puke worthy. I'll bet if we ask @UncleBuck real nice he can post it:-)
Click to expand...
peach was trolling when she said that. She's pushing buttons or in my communication with her, trying to push buttons. But yeah, it was something like "white men can't get assistance". This, in spite of clear information that she undoubtedly understood but chose to ignore.. So, I'd put her in the hate-filled and jealous category rather than bigot or racist. Def fat bastard or fat bastardette.

Self disabled by idle eating-caused diabetes and whatever else. Hell can be lived on earth. Within a few years she's going to start losing extremities. Karma can be a bitch. But maybe 'Cat likes them without legs.
 
Last edited:
ttystikk

ttystikk

Well-Known Member
UncleBuck said:
when are the bernie bros gonna realize that this applies more to their candidate than it does to hillary?

hillary won as many votes as obama did, and trounced bernie by nearly 4 million. a full 12% in the primary popular vote.
Click to expand...
Somehow you never mention that the media gave him the silent treatment the entire campaign, including when he won 80% of the caucus vote in my own precinct. As I've said before, I watched the CNN reporter actually walk out as soon as it became clear it was not going to be a victorious Shillary story.

THAT factor alone is worth several million swing votes and the donor class calling the shots knows this.
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
ttystikk said:
Somehow you never mention that the media gave him the silent treatment the entire campaign, including when he won 80% of the caucus vote in my own precinct. As I've said before, I watched the CNN reporter actually walk out as soon as it became clear it was not going to be a victorious Shillary story.

THAT factor alone is worth several million swing votes and the donor class calling the shots knows this.
Click to expand...
there is no data to back that up.
 
ttystikk

ttystikk

Well-Known Member
UncleBuck said:
there is no data to back that up.
Click to expand...
ME. I WAS THERE AND WATCHED, bro.

But go on believing the media story if you like. After all, neither of us got our desired candidate elected, did we?

Therefore, I'm thinking that focusing on yet more division isn't likely to succeed in that aim, so maybe it's time to try something different. How about finding some common ground, just for starters?
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
ttystikk said:
ME. I WAS THERE AND WATCHED, bro.

But go on believing the media story if you like. After all, neither of us got or desired candidate elected, did we?

Therefore, I'm thinking that focusing on yet more division isn't likely to succeed in that aim, so maybe it's time to try something different. How about finding some common ground, just for starters?
Click to expand...
that's anecdotal. you of all people should know better. this is how fluoride conspiracies start.
 
ttystikk

ttystikk

Well-Known Member
UncleBuck said:
that's anecdotal. you of all people should know better. this is how fluoride conspiracies start.
Click to expand...
Anecdotal maybe, but well enough supported by other, similar 'anecdotes' nationwide that it's hard to believe it's coincidence.

Bernie got a small fraction of the total coverage that either of the two eventual nominees did, and I see that as blatant evidence of bias.

What I don't get is why you don't?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top