This is why I hate the GOP

ChesusRice said:
@nitro harley
how much oil does the countershaft low gear need if it uses a bushing instead of a needle bearing?
Click to expand...

You will have to look in your manual. I have never owned a sportster. I have bushings and needle bearing in my BT 4 speed and the oil level is the same for both bearing types. But sporty's trans are not remote like a BT, so I would look in your manual. your question doesn't make sense to me. You are talking about your sporty right?
 
nitro harley said:
You will have to look in your manual. I have never owned a sportster. I have bushings and needle bearing in my BT 4 speed and the oil level is the same for both bearing types. But sporty's trans are not remote like a BT, so I would look in your manual. your question doesn't make sense to me. You are talking about your sporty right?
Click to expand...
Got all new gears for my bike. Low gear countershaft is a bushing instead of a needle bearing. SO I had to retrofit an earlier model countershaft to make it fit.
The earlier model countershaft is hollow. and has a hole for oil to get thru. There is no way to fit an oiler plug in the trap door due to interference of the stator. While I was waiting for an answer from you I found the answer. The only time the low gear countershaft is moving about the countershaft is when it is in neutral. All other times it is rotating with the countershaft.

So the answer is not much and I should be fine

Thanks for replying
 
ChesusRice said:
Got all new gears for my bike. Low gear countershaft is a bushing instead of a needle bearing. SO I had to retrofit an earlier model countershaft to make it fit.
The earlier model countershaft is hollow. and has a hole for oil to get thru. There is no way to fit an oiler plug in the trap door due to interference of the stator. While I was waiting for an answer from you I found the answer. The only time the low gear countershaft is moving about the countershaft is when it is in neutral. All other times it is rotating with the countershaft.

So the answer is not much and I should be fine

Thanks for replying
Click to expand...

Hey no problemO Chesus. I will be headed back to Oregon here pretty soon and start running my new drag bike. Get it ready for the summer. I was going to drive around america to some places I haven't been and hit some race tracks I haven't been to before. And try to make a couple Trump Rallys if I can. Kinda like just hit the road with no plans. nitro
 
bearkat42 said:
Willful stupidity is the only thing that actually annoys me, and you and I seem to disagree politically on most things, but I don't fashion you as a stupid person (yet). But let's see what the future holds. ;)
Click to expand...

I can assure you, I am not stupid. You and I agree on some things. For example, I agree that the police are partially just gang bangers with a never go to jail card. Not all, but mostly. Where we disagree is that you seem to believe that their behavior is motivated solely by racial animus. I think some probably are racists and driven by their hatred of whichever race they hate. Most are probably decent people at heart but caught up in the gang nature of their job and fearful of breaking ranks with the gang.

The root of the problem, though, are the laws themselves that allow endless reasons to fuck with people, and the setup for the scenario to suffocate that poor guy in New York for selling "loosies", for example. That is the libertarian side of me speaking. That is my problem with the left. Lefties seem always in favor of more government, more regulations, more laws, and then "outraged" when the obvious and predictable consequence of those piss-ant laws plays out with a dead guy.
 
desert dude said:
I can assure you, I am not stupid. You and I agree on some things. For example, I agree that the police are partially just gang bangers with a never go to jail card. Not all, but mostly. Where we disagree is that you seem to believe that their behavior is motivated solely by racial animus. I think some probably are racists and driven by their hatred of whichever race they hate. Most are probably decent people at heart but caught up in the gang nature of their job and fearful of breaking ranks with the gang.

The root of the problem, though, are the laws themselves that allow endless reasons to fuck with people, and the setup for the scenario to suffocate that poor guy in New York for selling "loosies", for example. That is the libertarian side of me speaking. That is my problem with the left. Lefties seem always in favor of more government, more regulations, more laws, and then "outraged" when the obvious and predictable consequence of those piss-ant laws plays out with a dead guy.
Click to expand...
Wow, some breathtaking generalities are expressed in your second paragraph regarding laws that are sponsored by liberals completely devoid of consideration of laws passed by the right.. Its your thesis, are you prepared to defend it? Perhaps with a citation or two and please, not some marginal wingnut media site, the citation should at least come from an impartial site or something from a non fox national media.

If not a citation, can you give an example of a liberal law that plays out with a dead guy. Also do it with some statistics. Compare the number of right wing laws that end up with dead guys and the number of liberal laws that end up with dead guys. Use whatever time frame you like.

Basically, I'm calling bullshit on this. If you are such a genius, you can defend your assertion.
 
Fogdog said:
you can defend your assertion.
Click to expand...
He won't because he can't, you correctly highlighted that

He actually blamed Eric Garner's death on "left-wing policies", I'm guessing the regulation of cigarettes in NY, instead of right-wing police procedures > assaulting a minority. Democratic cities are bad... except the ones they point to are always in republican states.. weird.. The liberal cities in liberal states seem to be doing pretty well for themselves, how about the republican cities in republican states?

If liberal/progressive policies are so bad, why do people prosper wherever they're effectively implemented? Norway, Finland, Denmark, Sweden, Canada, Germany, France, the UK? Why do they have higher life expectancy and a higher happiness quotient? Look at conservative strongholds where secularism is censored and banned; Egypt, Iran, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, etc. those sure are some bastions of freedom, liberty and democracy, ain't they!
 
Fogdog said:
Wow, some breathtaking generalities are expressed in your second paragraph regarding laws that are sponsored by liberals completely devoid of consideration of laws passed by the right.. Its your thesis, are you prepared to defend it? Perhaps with a citation or two and please, not some marginal wingnut media site, the citation should at least come from an impartial site or something from a non fox national media.

If not a citation, can you give an example of a liberal law that plays out with a dead guy. Also do it with some statistics. Compare the number of right wing laws that end up with dead guys and the number of liberal laws that end up with dead guys. Use whatever time frame you like.

Basically, I'm calling bullshit on this. If you are such a genius, you can defend your assertion.
Click to expand...

The war on drugs. Bill Clinton dialed up the pressure greatly. Millions of lives destroyed, hundreds of thousands of people killed. I will agree that the WOD is a left/right creature.

Zoning laws. Licensing laws. You need six years of training/apprenticeship to be an interior decorator. In Connecticut, you can't shine a light on another person's teeth without being a dentist because only dentists can hold a flashlight. The list is endless. The left loves these laws, and the right does too.

Leave people alone.
 
Fogdog said:
Wow, some breathtaking generalities are expressed in your second paragraph regarding laws that are sponsored by liberals completely devoid of consideration of laws passed by the right.. Its your thesis, are you prepared to defend it? Perhaps with a citation or two and please, not some marginal wingnut media site, the citation should at least come from an impartial site or something from a non fox national media.

If not a citation, can you give an example of a liberal law that plays out with a dead guy. Also do it with some statistics. Compare the number of right wing laws that end up with dead guys and the number of liberal laws that end up with dead guys. Use whatever time frame you like.

Basically, I'm calling bullshit on this. If you are such a genius, you can defend your assertion.
Click to expand...

Ferguson, Missouri. The DOJ report lists the "policing for profit" regime there as the underlying cause for Ferguson's misery. Where the DOJ report gets it wrong is their implication that the motive is racism. The motive is to rob people, mostly poor people, regardless of their race, and it goes on in every town, county, state, and federal enclave in the US.

Michael Brown caused his own death, but the culture of legal repression along with having no family life certainly created him.

Why you, and the other gaggle of lefties who "liked" your post support that sort of repression eludes me. The US could eliminate about 99% of the laws on the books and we would all be better off because of it.

Leave people alone.
 
desert dude said:
Ferguson, Missouri. The DOJ report lists the "policing for profit" regime there as the underlying cause for Ferguson's misery. Where the DOJ report gets it wrong is their implication that the motive is racism. The motive is to rob people, mostly poor people, regardless of their race, and it goes on in every town, county, state, and federal enclave in the US.

Michael Brown caused his own death, but the culture of legal repression along with having no family life certainly created him.

Why you, and the other gaggle of lefties who "liked" your post support that sort of repression eludes me. The US could eliminate about 99% of the laws on the books and we would all be better off because of it.

Leave people alone.
Click to expand...
Ok, so you are objecting to socially progressive laws to prevent racism and bigotry from interfering with the lives of minorities. Wow, save the klansman, bring back segregation.
 
Padawanbater2 said:
He won't because he can't, you correctly highlighted that

He actually blamed Eric Garner's death on "left-wing policies", I'm guessing the regulation of cigarettes in NY, instead of right-wing police procedures > assaulting a minority. Democratic cities are bad... except the ones they point to are always in republican states.. weird.. The liberal cities in liberal states seem to be doing pretty well for themselves, how about the republican cities in republican states?

If liberal/progressive policies are so bad, why do people prosper wherever they're effectively implemented? Norway, Finland, Denmark, Sweden, Canada, Germany, France, the UK? Why do they have higher life expectancy and a higher happiness quotient? Look at conservative strongholds where secularism is censored and banned; Egypt, Iran, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, etc. those sure are some bastions of freedom, liberty and democracy, ain't they!
Click to expand...
He's objecting to anti discrimination laws. Sounds very much like Rob Roy. His argument is that by desegregating schools, for example, liberals killed people. Dumbshit libertarian made up shit.
 
Fogdog said:
Ok, so you are objecting to socially progressive laws to prevent racism and bigotry from interfering with the lives of minorities. Wow, save the klansman, bring back segregation.
Click to expand...
Minorities don't like you, because you constantly claim they are helpless victims in need of your help
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Jimdamick
  • Poll Poll
What's the use?
2 3
Replies
40
Views
2K
hanimmal
hanimmal
G
Why did the maker of OxyContin pay Canadian doctors nearly three-and-a-half times more money per cap
Replies
7
Views
518
cannadan
cannadan
bearkat42
Theocracy Warning In Republican Strongholds Of Kentucky and Texas
2
Replies
32
Views
1K
ThickStemz
T
Justin-case
This is war
10 11 12
Replies
224
Views
9K
UncleBuck
UncleBuck
VIANARCHRIS
‘Expert’ witnesses and the groundbreaking pot ruling
Replies
0
Views
500
VIANARCHRIS
VIANARCHRIS
Back
Top