trayvan martin

Dr Kynes

Dr Kynes

Well-Known Member
Harrekin said:
I'm sorry but even when using a PCR it's still a very low chance of transferring usable DNA.
Click to expand...
shoot a 1911 then we will talk homey.

youll also learn what your weenis is.

and how much it hurts when the hammer bites it off.

and how long it bleeds afterwards.

and how hard it is to scrape human flesh out of the sliderails of a pistol.

a 1911 is like a guru among firearms. it says little, but teaches so much. thats why we love them still.

lessons on the vulnerability of the weenis is only the first part of the 1911's gita.

later you learn about the hazards of the bushing spring and it's desire for freedom.

so many lessons all without a single word. truly john browning was a wise gunmaker.
 
N

NoDrama

Well-Known Member
LOL hazards of the Bushing spring indeed. Watch one of them suckers go 50 feet when you turn that bushing. LOL good times!
 
Samwell Seed Well

Samwell Seed Well

Well-Known Member
NoDrama said:
LOL Not finding DNA proves NOTHING. Spin lack of evidence to insinuate some kind of guilt.
Click to expand...
not finding what dna and where proves nothing?

also when he has to prove he was in mortal danger , id say every bit of information that corroborates his story no matter how miniscule would help, as his whole case revolves around being in mortal danger, first it was the beating that required no more than avg medical treatment(stickes advil) and then it was he grabbed my gun . . . . he has to prove these things to be true

so its all circumstantial and it all matters as we only have one real witness and he is biased as whether or not it was justified, he thinks it was, that is obvious
 
N

NoDrama

Well-Known Member
Samwell Seed Well said:
also when he has to prove he was in mortal danger
Click to expand...
Which TV show did you watch that makes you think this? He doesn't have to PROVE he was in mortal danger, he only has to feel like he was in danger. Which he has already stated, so that part is already proven, done, finished.
 
Samwell Seed Well

Samwell Seed Well

Well-Known Member
ya i dont think thats how the law works, between murder 2 and not murder 2 he has to prove his defense

its has to be shown without a doubt that if he had not shot Martin he would have been gravely injured and or killed

and that has not been proven

he hasnt proven anything except that he chased down a skittles buying kids with a gun and shot him
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
lol, zimmbitch has to take the stand and explain his 7 different versions of what happened that night. :lol:

whatever happens, i want to see him explain those many varying accounts. it promises to be a hoot. :hump:
 
Canna Sylvan

Canna Sylvan

Well-Known Member
Samwell Seed Well said:
ya i dont think thats how the law works, between murder 2 and not murder 2 he has to prove his defense

its has to be shown without a doubt that if he had not shot Martin he would have been gravely injured and or killed

and that has not been proven

he hasnt proven anything except that he chased down a skittles buying kids with a gun and shot him
Click to expand...
This is a weird angle. I don't understand why Skittles wants to buy kids. Also, Skittles (the slaver) did this, by force, with a gun? How horrible! Dude, I would've shot Skittles too, if I saw him doing that shit. :curse:
 
N

NoDrama

Well-Known Member
Samwell Seed Well said:
ya i dont think thats how the law works, between murder 2 and not murder 2 he has to prove his defense

its has to be shown without a doubt that if he had not shot Martin he would have been gravely injured and or killed

and that has not been proven

he hasnt proven anything except that he chased down a skittles buying kids with a gun and shot him
Click to expand...
It's is wonderful that you don't "think" this is how the law works, but alas that is how it works. He doesn't have to prove he would have been injured, it is IMPOSSIBLE to prove a negative.

Let me make you an example of proving a negative.

Have you stopped beating your kids yet?



The Law:

Essentially the defendant has to meet an objective standard of showing that using force was necessary and that he or she had an immediate fear of death or serious bodily harm.

You can't prove me wrong, can't do it, no one can do it, because I am 100% correct on this sammy.
 
Dr Kynes

Dr Kynes

Well-Known Member
Canna Sylvan said:
This is a weird angle. I don't understand why Skittles wants to buy kids. Also, Skittles (the slaver) did this, by force, with a gun? How horrible! Dude, I would've shot Skittles too, if I saw him doing that shit. :curse:
Click to expand...
sammy is trying to downplay martin's nefarious activites by couching them in innocuous terms.

he was a SKITTLES PUSHER! and a strawman buyer of DANGEROUS ILLEGAL LARGE BEVERAGES!! and he intended to give these filthy things TO CHILDREN!!!!!!!

he's lucky zimmerman got to him before bloomberg did.
 
budlover13

budlover13

King Tut
Samwell Seed Well said:
ya i dont think thats how the law works, between murder 2 and not murder 2 he has to prove his defense

its has to be shown without a doubt that if he had not shot Martin he would have been gravely injured and or killed

and that has not been proven

he hasnt proven anything except that he chased down a skittles buying kids with a gun and shot him
Click to expand...
No, he has to prove that he BELIEVED, reasonably, he would be gravely injured or killed.
 
budlover13

budlover13

King Tut
Dr Kynes said:
if that iced tea was one of the arizona tallboys, martin prolly threatened to open it and give zimmie the diabeetus.
Click to expand...
Lol. Now we come back to perception and 12 people's opinion on what their perception might have been.

Not defending either side here. Just reminded me of a Padwan discussion involving the belief in a Creator.
 
beardo

beardo

Well-Known Member
Does anyone think they should appoint Zimmerman sheriff or at least president of the neighborhood watch?
At least he is proactive in preventing crime
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
cannabineer said:
Lately folks have been generating Trayvon threads that at once descended into non-topical and surprisingly acrimonious mudflinging. You missed some real fun, /facepalm. cn
Click to expand...
that one yesterday was fresh hell.

it wasn't a thread about the zimmerman case, it was a smear thread, a platform for one very racist member who didn't have a friggin' clue about even a single fact of the case.

glad you closed it, i needed to harvest but didn't want to miss any good sigs.
 
Harrekin

Harrekin

Well-Known Member
UncleBuck said:
that one yesterday was fresh hell.

it wasn't a thread about the zimmerman case, it was a smear thread, a platform for one very racist member who didn't have a friggin' clue about even a single fact of the case.

glad you closed it, i needed to harvest but didn't want to miss any good sigs.
Click to expand...
You lie, it was AWESOME!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top