MuyLocoNC
Well-Known Member
Yeah, they can't give directives either. Apparently, they can tell you what they don't need you to do, which of course, has no bearing on what you can or should do.
trayvan martin
- Thread starter UncleBuck
- Start date
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
they can and did give a directive to the person who called them for help, but zimmy decided it was a bad directive and now has to look over his shoulder every minute of his sad and pathetic life.
how did ignoring that official and authoritative instruction work out for him?
desert dude
Well-Known Member
Except that you are lying, as usual. What was Zimmerman's response when the operator said, "we don't need you to do that"? Anybody with google can answer my simple question. Can you, Buck?
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
he went on the offense after that. told dispatch to call him to find out where he was going.
he took two flashlights and a gun to go "looking for an address" where none existed for about 5 minutes.
in his own words, he said "and then i walked back towards him".
http://www.talkleft.com/zimm/singletontranscript1.pdf
that was zimmerman's actual response in his own words and actions.
desert dude
Well-Known Member
Let me refresh everybody else's memory. Refreshing the memory of a liar is a pointless exercise.
Dispatcher: Are you following him?
Zimmerman: Yeah.
Dispatcher: Okay, we don't need you to do that.
Zimmerman: Okay.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
oh, you meant his meaningless verbal response rather than his actual physical response.
because for a second there i thought you actually wanted to know what zimmerman did, not just pretend like another one of his lies was somehow not a lie.
because what really happened was that he went on the offense after that. told dispatch to call him to find out where he was going.
he took two flashlights and a gun to go "looking for an address" where none existed for about 5 minutes.
in his own words, he said "and then i walked back towards him".
http://www.talkleft.com/zimm/singletontranscript1.pdf
that was zimmerman's actual response in his own words and actions.
desert dude
Well-Known Member
A jury of Z's peers heard everything you have posted and rejected all of it. Unanimously. Just as every other rational person who followed the trial came to the same conclusion: Zimmerman acted in self defense. Martin caused his own death because of his own bad actions. That must stick in your craw, huh?
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
you clearly don't get what the jury ruled on and didn't rule on.
the jury ruled that there was a very slight possibility that zimmerman may have acted in self defense.
no one but a white supremacist like you would say that running away from an unidentified stranger who chases you in the dark is a good way to cause your own death, and no one but a white supremacist like you would say that grabbing your gun and chasing down an unarmed teenage kid is a good self defense move.
but it was nice to see you try to change the subject away from zimmerman's actions after i set you straight on that part.
you sad little racist.
desert dude
Well-Known Member
So slight, in fact, that the jury unanimously acquitted George Zimmerman of second degree murder, and manslaughter as well.
hahahahahahahahahhaha.
You are such a fucking loser Buck, and without even a hint of shame. You have been spamming this same bullshit for two years and lying the whole time. Virtually everybody has called you out on it but you stick to it. You are an excellent propagandist!
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
do you get how the burden of proof works?
the state has to prove their case beyond a reasonable doubt. just the slightest possibility that zimmerman might possibly have acted in self defense is enough, and that's what they ruled on.
no one but a racist like you who knowingly joins white supremacy groups would say that a jury ruled that martin caused his own death.
why should i have shame for correcting your misinterpretation of facts and history?
shouldn't you be ashamed for trying to misrepresent these things?
it's not like i have a history of knowingly joining white supremacy groups either, like you do. of course, the point of your white supremacy groups is white pride, so i don't know why you act so ashamed of your membership in that white supremacy group. but you certainly do.
desert dude
Well-Known Member
"How many times can I say, "white supremacy group" in a paragraph, and sound slightly demented?"
You're a good propagandist, Buck.
LULZ
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
well the fact is that you were a member of a white supremacist group here on RIU, and you are trying to claim that martin's dead corpse was somehow on trial.
i am simply correcting your misinterpretations and putting facts about zimmerman's behavior on record.
you may think that is propaganda, the rest call it "fact".
desert dude
Well-Known Member
bu$hleaguer
Well-Known Member
There's a white supremacist group on RIU?! Far out, man!
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
so what wasn't fact?
because they found two flashlights and a gun back behind the houses where zimmerman was lurking for about 5 minutes after he ended the call to dispatch, right after he told dispatch to call him for his location and said "and then i walked back towards him". no addresses to be looking for back there either.
desert dude
Well-Known Member
The fact that matters is that Martin assaulted Zimmerman and tried to smear his brains on the sidewalk and lost his life because of his own violent, bad acts. Zimmerman shot Martin in self defense, just ask the jury.
LULZ
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
if someone followed you in their truck as you walked home from the grocery store, then got out without identifying themselves and chased you down in the dark, would you be afraid for your life? if you had a gun, would you fire on them in self defense?
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
that's not what they ruled, they ruled that such a scenario might have been possible.
MuyLocoNC
Well-Known Member
I don't want to spend too much time on this, but a directive IS an order. Not only are they synonyms, every definition of directive begins with "an order" or "an order from an authority". They are virtually interchangeable.
Kind of like calling a person that was banned and is now using a different username, a sockpuppet. It just don't pass muster.