Was Trump stupid for claiming credit for "the vaccine" , will Democrats use that to fuck him in his fat ass as their own vaccine regret intensifies?

M

max420thc

Well-Known Member
HGCC said:
Lol, it's that guy I called stupid yesterday saying stupid shit again today.

So uh, what is it you think is on hunter's laptop and why do you think it matters? Its like the buttery emails, you yelled and yelled about them...and all you got was crazy people shooting up pizza parlors.
Click to expand...
I have seen qhats on hunters laptop unlike most people. The records of the payoffs of foreign governments is all over it. Not including pictures of hunter with his pathetic penis in little kids.
We all know what the left is. Pee dough files .
I think Trump left his classified documents on Hunters laptop. Let's see if you can get the FBI to investigate that.
 
Herb & Suds

Herb & Suds

Well-Known Member
max420thc said:
I have seen qhats on hunters laptop unlike most people. The records of the payoffs of foreign governments is all over it. Not including pictures of hunter with his pathetic penis in little kids.
We all know what the left is. Pee dough files .
I think Trump left his classified documents on Hunters laptop. Let's see if you can get the FBI to investigate that.
Click to expand...
27E7FA29-EBE0-4D4A-A2EB-233650B4E629.jpeg
 
V256.420

V256.420

Well-Known Member
max420thc said:
I have seen qhats on hunters laptop unlike most people. The records of the payoffs of foreign governments is all over it. Not including pictures of hunter with his pathetic penis in little kids.
We all know what the left is. Pee dough files .
I think Trump left his classified documents on Hunters laptop. Let's see if you can get the FBI to investigate that.
Click to expand...
He saw what's on hunters laptop guys!! too cool!! :rolleyes:
 
HGCC

HGCC

Well-Known Member
max420thc said:
I have seen qhats on hunters laptop unlike most people. The records of the payoffs of foreign governments is all over it. Not including pictures of hunter with his pathetic penis in little kids.
We all know what the left is. Pee dough files .
I think Trump left his classified documents on Hunters laptop. Let's see if you can get the FBI to investigate that.
Click to expand...
So uhhh...you looked at those pictures yourself you say?
 
cannabineer

cannabineer

Ursus marijanus
max420thc said:
You make it too easy. Sanders , AOC although I should not capitalizer her initials as she hates capitalism , Omar, Schumer , about the whole democratic party and half the republicans
Click to expand...
Neither advocates the collectivization of the means of production. That is the defining characteristic of radical socialism, of which communism is a subset.

Fail.

n.b. the regimes that call themselves communist are not.
 
Lycka

Lycka

Active Member
cannabineer said:
Taking sides is not what matters.

Having and using access to information that has not been selected along ideological lines is what matters today.

Especially when it is time to vote! Disregard sentiment. Attend to information.
Click to expand...

Is there any news source that doesn't have an angle though?

Not that I disagree with you. I'm not sure how to get people more informed than just suggesting reading as many sources as possible, not taking things at face value (or at least assume there's some leaning to it), and make their own best judgment.
 
Herb & Suds

Herb & Suds

Well-Known Member
Lycka said:
Is there any news source that doesn't have an angle though?

Not that I disagree with you. I'm not sure how to get people more informed than just suggesting reading as many sources as possible, not taking things at face value (or at least assume there's some leaning to it), and make their own best judgment.
Click to expand...
Welcome back to RIU and straight to the political section :weed:
 
cannabineer

cannabineer

Ursus marijanus
Lycka said:
Is there any news source that doesn't have an angle though?

Not that I disagree with you. I'm not sure how to get people more informed than just suggesting reading as many sources as possible, not taking things at face value (or at least assume there's some leaning to it), and make their own best judgment.
Click to expand...
Two strategies help here.
1) default either to peer-reviewed science, or news services known for neutrality and factuality. Reuters and AP are the leading examples.

2) know that the adaptive search feature in the major search engine reinforces “echo chamber” bias in a way not easily overcome.

To test the premise, search for sites that contradict what your adaptive search dossier has learned about your preferences and search habits. It takes a surprising amount of effort to reach past this rampart of confirmation bias.

Number three of two: be extremely suspicious of content designed to recruit sentiment. That is a powerful tool for sabotaging objective inquiry.
 
Lycka

Lycka

Active Member
cannabineer said:
Two strategies help here.
1) default either to peer-reviewed science, or news services known for neutrality and factuality. Reuters and AP are the leading examples.

2) know that the adaptive search feature in the major search engine reinforces “echo chamber” bias in a way not easily overcome.

To test the premise, search for sites that contradict what your adaptive search dossier has learned about your preferences and search habits. It takes a surprising amount of effort to reach past this rampart of confirmation bias.

Number three of two: be extremely suspicious of content designed to recruit sentiment. That is a powerful tool for sabotaging objective inquiry.
Click to expand...
I'd "like" or mark "informative" but I'm not able to (because I'm new?)

Also, sorry for being off topic but others have done it too, so...

6rjl0a.jpg
 
hanimmal

hanimmal

Well-Known Member
Lycka said:
Is there any news source that doesn't have an angle though?

Not that I disagree with you. I'm not sure how to get people more informed than just suggesting reading as many sources as possible, not taking things at face value (or at least assume there's some leaning to it), and make their own best judgment.
Click to expand...
Try out apnews.com or Reuters.com for a non-biased information source.

The problem with online researching is most websites that are free are spreading propaganda. And they do it really well because they look legit and have about 80% of their stories are correct, so when they slip in the bullshit it gets absorbed as actual information.

For example I don’t trust “the Hill”.
https://www.rollitup.org/t/the-great-reset.1039126/post-15974731

Another one is “the Nation”.
https://www.rollitup.org/t/trumps-war-on-factual-news-journalism.1020994/post-15615786

Of course almost everything on the right wing ends up being propaganda lately, but one that does a good job for a right leaning perspective is the Houston chronical.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top