zimmerman news
- Thread starter desert dude
- Start date
- Status
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
This will be too easy.
And now your whole post has become a retarded rant with no actual facts.
it's a fact that you asked "how does that make me a racist?".
it's a fact that you tried to play it off as "oh, i just posted one article".
it's a fact that you tried to claim that you were just posting examples of "media ignoring black on white crime".
it's a fact that i was already posting in this thread, hence "luring me in" is just nonsense you're blathering.
it's a fact that there are articles about black on white crime out there from far more credible sources than stormfront.
don't be ashamed that you enjoy doing some reading on stormfront, take after the others who have recently flooded this board and own it! be Proud!
anyhoo, if my new sig didn't bother you, you wouldn't be acting so bothered and inventing a half a dozen new justifications for why you thought the stormfront article you enjoyed would be appreciated by others.
SirGreenThumb
Well-Known Member
I refer you back to post #1967. When you feel like posting the same thing once again that has no value, refer back to it. Just because you post it over and over and over, doesn't make it true.
I already lured you in simply by mentioning stormfront and linking to it. You took the bait and now your spouting nonsense like always. Consider yourself trolled. kiss-ass
Canna Sylvan
Well-Known Member
You better watch out, or I might make you one of my special interest topics I research. I don't think your 41k posts could keep up.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
it's clear you weren't luring me since i was here anyway, that was just your original and lamest excuse for posting a source from a site that you clearly frequent.
if it was just a lure, you wouldn't have gone on to ask how it made you racist, or tried to claim that it was just one article and you'd never been there before, or tried to justify it by saying you just wanted to post examples of media bias. those things are all dead giveaways, smarty.
you were exposing your racist resentments long before posting the stormfront article, this just removes all doubt.
people here may smoke a lot of weed, but that doesn't mean we have all forgotten your fabricated story about how your abortion factory keeps getting shafted at her post office job by some shiftless black lady.
the fact that you think people would believe such nonsense speaks to how dumb you are and nothing else.
consider yourself exposed. enjoy the sig.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
mr. "racist for a cause" comes to the aid of his stormfront posting friend!
can't you just feel the love?
SirGreenThumb
Well-Known Member
Canna Sylvan
Well-Known Member
I am the one who controls Buck's light on the wall toy he plays with.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
remember when you told me that you NEVER GET MAD ON THE INTERNET!
and then i trolled you about your ladyboy's hasty abortion and how the babysitter molested you when you were 10 and you started making internet tough guy threats at me?
i certainly remember that.
well, the point is that your ongoing series of incredibly lame excuses in this thread remind me a lot of all the excuses you made for yourself after i trolled you into apoplectic rage back then.
send your ladyboy my condolences that you rushed her into a hasty abortion which is probably still affecting her work performance at that dead end post office job she's stuck supporting you with.
nighty night, sirgreendumb!
Harrekin
Well-Known Member
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
Let the butthurt flow through you.
i am a little butthurt about zimm walking back home with his gun. he was lucky to avoid the felony that almost prevented him from having one in the first place.
although i disagree with the verdict, as people often do, i accept it. i don't have to like it, but there was just enough doubt about what happened at the very end that even i could see myself letting him walk.
one thing i do like about the trial is that it disproved a lot of what the most prominently racist crowd was saying, such as zimm would be unable to get a fair trial and there would be riots and whatnot. zimm got a fair trial, and i would say even more than fair since the jury didn't get to find out what a history of getting too involved and angry and violent he had.
none of my feelings about the trial disprove the increasingly obvious statements and evolving posting history of sirgreendumb. his words, especiall over time, speak for themselves.
sometimes it takes a while before you realize what kind of a person is posting here.
TL;DR my minor butthurt over the trial has nothing to do with sirgreenthumb's obvious resentments.
Serino testified that Zimmerman's story was consistent. Keep in mind this is the prosecution's witness. I recall him saying that basically the only thing he questioned was the severity of the injuries, which he then described as 'marginally life threatening'. I don't remember him ever calling Zimmerman a liar.
What evidence was there that a crime was committed? Zimmerman's beat up face? Prosecutors aren't really supposed to bring charges that there is no evidence to support. Police aren't supposed to arrest people if there is no evidence of a crime.
The police didn't arrest Zimmerman, and the Prosecution didn't try to bring charges because there were none that could be seriously proven.
Why did people higher up stepped in and charge him with charges that there was no evidence of? Why did the president try to get a man convicted of a crime without evidence?
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
either that, or he was a pathological liar. that was his actual testimony.
when did obama do that?
and also, should the martins have moved somewhere where they wouldn't have to sit on the back of the bus and their son wouldn't have to be profiled as a criminal?
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
there was plenty of evidence that zimmerman had ill will and hatred toward those fucking punks, those fucking assholes who kept getting away.
there was abundant evidence of zimm lying his ass off, exaggerating, and making the story sound worse with every iteration.
doesn't matter if the jury believed all that as long as they believed that zimm was a fragile, panicked vagina. doesn't matter if zimm really thought a couple of tiny scratches and a bloody nose would kill him. he just had to think a minor scrap would kill him, and there only had to be a reasonable doubt about his pussiness.
the case against zimm was solid, that the jury deliberated for so long is evidence of such.
Uncle Pirate
Active Member
I don't understand why through the entire history of this case and even now that it's over, the media keeps showing Martin's pictures of him when he was 12. Why not show more current photographs? Are they trying to hide something?
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
Antidisestablishmentarian
Well-Known Member
After he said that he was asked if Zimmerman gave Serino any reason to think he was a pathological liar. Serino said no. That's the ACTUAL testimony.
Harrekin
Well-Known Member
And this is one from one of his social media pages...i'll be happy to oblige.
do notice what a criminal thug this child is.
Notice the bullets in the magazine, so it's not fake.
kelly4
Well-Known Member
- Status