Search results

First off, your opinion on the matter doesn't influence reasonable doubt. Secondly, I admitted that you could reasonably say you've achieve proof of preponderance of evidence. Go ahead, look it up.. I'll wait.

This whole following argument is ridiculous. It's a desperate attempt to prove that Zimmerman was the aggressor in the fight without providing any evidence what so ever. It barely meets the standards for preponderance of evidence (if that) and is a clear example of big mouths trying to convict...

Shall we refer back to the very trial in question? "If you he was on his back and bleeding from the nose, where would blood likely go?"

If I punched you in the nose and broke it would your blood be on my hand?

The rhetoric of stupidity is still going on? God damn it's a fucking broken record.

Right. The guy who claims that if they were doing these NSA probes they would have been able to prevent 9/11 is the same guy who claimed they had no clue somebody would ever use planes as missiles. Contradictory statements made by liars who just want more concentrated government power.

Ignorance, that's what paralegals are for :)

Google has been hacking webcams for years now.

The main point that can be gathered from your post is that somebody with a different opinion then yours makes them a cultist. Cool.

Wrong. Ethnic "ignorance" as you say was a byproduct of the war. As well, persecution of specific groups (typically ethnic groups) is utilized by those in power or seeking power in order to fire up support for war. With former KGB and current president in power, Russia is pushing back towards...

Me! Me! I'm sensible.... I'm far more left and libertarian then that dumb box. Middle of the road people have the lowest of sensibility in my opinion. Wishy washy flakes with no reasoning of their own.

You can't be both. You're either a libertarian or an anarchist.

Stop blaming the younger people like a bunch of toothless grumpy old men. Reality check: history repeats itself because history is written by the victor. The history we're fed is one group's version of the truth that is pushed down the line like playing the telephone game in preschool until...

Hypocritical. You accuse me of making blanket statements, and you do the same the very next sentence. Can we move on, or do you want to continue to make yourself look dumb :) So.. either you are contradicting yourself or you completely missed the point of what I was saying. Let me break it...

When you go in with the belief that you are the only rational one, that only presents a basis for ignorance. It shows you have no mental capacity to think outside of yourself, either that your just very egotistical. I'm happy you're proud of your position; positive self-esteem is very healthy.

Lol, so that's a conspiracy theory UB will support.

You and I both know that the right wing doesn't truly aspire for a free market. It's the same as they don't truly aspire for limited government. They only want to limit different areas. My not being right wing has little to do with my stance on social issues. BTW, if you view liberal as...

LBJ has Kennedy blood on his hands..

Oh, you mean, like how we have to constantly make sure we say that we are "classical" liberals, because the left wing has hijacked the word liberal?

I am not right wing at all, fyi. However, you live in a world that doesn't teach you that there is more than right and left, so I can't blame you for it.