DUET 2400 (LED FIXTURE) - UP TO 2400 WATTS (Flip Chip Opto)

nevergoodenuf

Well-Known Member
I am am not sure, I am buying bulk and pay in the neighborhood of $150. Plus the 2 week wait to make plus shipping from Taiwan @ $3 a pound, for Air instead of ship shipping.
 

Bill Lidgate

Active Member
To make a simplistic analysis, the power density at the thermal interface tells you a bit about how hard its going to be to cool a given LED.

so Watts / surface area (SA) of the pad shows how much heat is going to have to be pumped to the heatsink/water pipe/air to keep the chip from cooking.


this is not totally fair, as the inFLUX has individual SMD LEDs with much smaller SA on one side of the pad, while the Duet 2400 has almost the entire pad filled with LEDs, but as a first approximation it does let you know how much effort is required to lose the heat from the LED/pad combo. The Duet has a real thermal bottleneck that needs to be compensated for with a HUGE thermal sink on the other side, and water cooling should probably be mandatory IMHO.
 

PurpleBuz

Well-Known Member
The Duet has a real thermal bottleneck that needs to be compensated for with a HUGE thermal sink on the other side
So why would we want to deploy the duet as a grow light ? Seems to contradict everything I have learned.

- more modest sized light sources for a more even coverage versus a large single point source
- significant height required
- duet's efficiency is lower than CXBs.

Seems bigger is not always better. don't get me wrong, I love seeing nevergoodenuf's grows and they are showing us that they grow well, but I'm trying to understand what the advantages are.
 

Atulip

Well-Known Member
We don't want the duet. They just want to post new threads and say "most powerful".

Let me see "most efficient" instead of pointing out the better cooling of flip chip over wire bonded cobs then boasting a chip that creates more heat...
 
Top