Lady boys and high heels

D

doughper

Well-Known Member
aBowlOfWhat? said:
Most of the “outrage” is the fact that schools now carry books and health class teaching kids how to have sex. How to use plugs and toys and dildos. Kids shouldn’t be exposed to these ideas. And seeing anyone male or female in a gstring twerking there ass in front of 6 year olds isnt cool Call me old fashion I guess
Click to expand...
That shit's not in any damn school, but from the GOP's own library, I'd bet anything. Fucking creepy hypocrites.
 
OldMedUser

OldMedUser

Well-Known Member
Roger A. Shrubber said:
strange coincidence, i'm reading Stephen King's Gunslinger books again, for the NNnnth time, and just got to the part where "Someone saved my life tonight" just happens to be playing when several key events take place.
No epiphany or anything, just a strange coincidence...
Click to expand...
Time I read that series again myself. Been 10 years or so and the books are still sitting in the bookcase just waiting. :)

:peace:
 
Herb & Suds

Herb & Suds

Well-Known Member
aBowlOfWhat? said:
Most of the “outrage” is the fact that schools now carry books and health class teaching kids how to have sex. How to use plugs and toys and dildos. Kids shouldn’t be exposed to these ideas. And seeing anyone male or female in a gstring twerking there ass in front of 6 year olds isnt cool Call me old fashion I guess
Click to expand...
Have you seen the crowds at Trumps rallies 76C0B8F7-57E2-43A6-9D8E-05C1FD591C2A.jpeg
 
cannabineer

cannabineer

Ursus marijanus
Fogdog

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
cannabineer said:
“Nothing harmful. Nothing threatening.” Fox continues with their culture war hatemongering.

Middle school student allegedly sent home for refusing to change shirt that said 'There are only two genders' | Fox News

Liam Morrison, a seventh-grader at Nichols Middle School in Middleborough, Mass., was allegedly sent home for refusing to remove a T-shirt that said. 'There are only two genders.'
www.foxnews.com www.foxnews.com
Click to expand...
How do we resolve this issue? I'm not even sure who was wronged.
 
Sativied

Sativied

Well-Known Member
cannabineer said:
That said, I don’t know if it crosses the line far enough to justify the action. (imo this makes it very effective as propaganda)
Click to expand...
Apply the leaf blower-badminton theory. People are free to use a leaf blower but if someone would use one to disturb a badminton match it would justify action against the blower. I think the shirt, and far worse, shouldn’t be forbidden in general, but it’s up to the teacher/school to determine if it disturbs the class. The actual action should be based on the intent. In this case the intent is obvious, it’s toxic behavior, which teachers shouldn’t tolerate.
 
cannabineer

cannabineer

Ursus marijanus
Sativied said:
Apply the leaf blower-badminton theory. People are free to use a leaf blower but if someone would use one to disturb a badminton match it would justify action against the blower. I think the shirt, and far worse, shouldn’t be forbidden in general, but it’s up to the teacher/school to determine if it disturbs the class. The actual action should be based on the intent. In this case the intent is obvious, it’s toxic behavior, which teachers shouldn’t tolerate.
Click to expand...
heh; I’ve used the metaphor of bringing a skeet gun to a Frisbee match.
 
CANON_Grow

CANON_Grow

Well-Known Member
Sativied said:
Apply the leaf blower-badminton theory. People are free to use a leaf blower but if someone would use one to disturb a badminton match it would justify action against the blower. I think the shirt, and far worse, shouldn’t be forbidden in general, but it’s up to the teacher/school to determine if it disturbs the class. The actual action should be based on the intent. In this case the intent is obvious, it’s toxic behavior, which teachers shouldn’t tolerate.
Click to expand...
That sets an awfully dangerous precedent, does it not? With how a large population of the first world seems intent on removing women's rights, how long until girls/women must wear dresses that cover their ankles, or more extreme - cover their faces? Can't show any legs or it might disturb the class... If we leave it up to teachers/schools, it's almost guaranteed that it will happen. This is one of those cases where it's better to allow them to wear it, but have the school openly discuss it with the students. We shouldn't call that toxic behaviour from a kid in grade seven, just being immature which is expected at that age.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top