Twitter users bully woman into committing suicide for branding her homophobic

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
i did not seek you out or start this convo

block me but dont fucking lie
The first series of replies had originally been pretty good and helped me in forming my conclusions but you became emotional and started projecting your assumptions of what I was saying into objectionable, insulting, histrionic meltdowns and we had stopped talking. Out of the blue, you felt your opinion needed to be shoved up my nose, as in:


bullshit you said earlier on about keeping it honest

stick by that....
I honestly don't wish to communicate with you on this subject any more. If you do reply, please find a way to make it interesting and not the whine for attention that your recent replies have become.

I'm going to go look for something that can get that smell of dog shit off my boots.
 

ginjawarrior

Well-Known Member
The first series of replies had originally been pretty good and helped me in forming my conclusions but you became emotional and started projecting your assumptions of what I was saying into objectionable, insulting, histrionic meltdowns and we had stopped talking. Out of the blue, you felt your opinion needed to be shoved up my nose, as in:



if you want to flounce off thats fine i said i didnt want to keep going round in circles.

if your going to insist on making snidey comments clearly directed at me then do not act like a slapped queen when i choose to come back and reply to them

if your done talking to me then dont hit reply with demands that i leave you alone

just stop messaging and stop the snidey comments
 

abandonconflict

Well-Known Member
The first series of replies had originally been pretty good and helped me in forming my conclusions but you became emotional and started projecting your assumptions of what I was saying into objectionable, insulting, histrionic meltdowns and we had stopped talking. Out of the blue, you felt your opinion needed to be shoved up my nose, as in:




I honestly don't wish to communicate with you on this subject any more. If you do reply, please find a way to make it interesting and not the whine for attention that your recent replies have become.

I'm going to go look for something that can get that smell of dog shit off my boots.
Come on, not even a little attention? He's sad that his favorite homophobic pornstar hanged herself.
 

ginjawarrior

Well-Known Member
What's more is there that I can say to a homophobic bigot who has a histrionic meltdown when I point out that gay and bisexual men have the right to equal treatment in the work place?

other than fuck off, that is.
the worse kind of homophobe that openly admiits on a forum like this to fuck men

who the fuck are you to call me that?

im just a realist and pragmatist

a single random sexual enounter with gay or bi is 154 times more likely to encounter someone with hiv than with
a single random sexual hetersexual encounter

in other words if a pornstar from an otherwise tight and stringent ship decided to have sex out side of the profession

the heterosexual porn star could fuck 154 people to get to the same chance of meeting a hiv positive person than a gay porn star could

i support equal rights in the work place all the way up untill it affects the rights of a woman to chose who she is prepared to fuck

again

who the fuck are you to call me that?

i fuck men
 

see4

Well-Known Member
I hate to be the bearer of bad news, but in the case of "what weaknesses", the word "what" is more correct than the word "which".

according to several sources, namely Pearson, what is used to ask a question when there are an unknown number of possibilities, which is used to ask a finite set of options.
 

ginjawarrior

Well-Known Member
unfortunately, you used the word "what" incorrectly here. @zeddd pointed out earlier your misuse of the word "what", in this case, you should have used "which", as in, "in which sense".

hope I've helped.

please refer to my previous post for further help and affirmation.
lol thank you i'll keep it in mind

although i quite like making mistakes to keep the pedants happy

it gives them a bit more purpose each day, gives them something extra to do.

you know its the little things in life :hump:
 

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
the worse kind of homophobe that openly admiits on a forum like this to fuck men

who the fuck are you to call me that?

im just a realist and pragmatist

a single random sexual enounter with gay or bi is 154 times more likely to encounter someone with hiv than with
a single random sexual hetersexual encounter

in other words if a pornstar from an otherwise tight and stringent ship decided to have sex out side of the profession

the heterosexual porn star could fuck 154 people to get to the same chance of meeting a hiv positive person than a gay porn star could

i support equal rights in the work place all the way up untill it affects the rights of a woman to chose who she is prepared to fuck

again

who the fuck are you to call me that?

i fuck men
Exactly.

I submit to the forum a homophobic bigot who says that gay men aren't safe to work with because gay men can't control their sexual urges. As predicted the homophobic bigot had a histrionic meltdown when I said that everybody has the right to be treated equally in the work place.

You can control your urges and engage in safe sex, can't you? But others can't? By saying as much, you are homophobic. That you "fuck men" doesn't make what you say any less homophobic. Goddamit you are stupid too.
 

ginjawarrior

Well-Known Member
Exactly.

I submit to the forum a homophobic bigot who says that gay men aren't safe to work with because gay men can't control their sexual urges.
i gave a 1 to 1 comparison

never once singled out gay men for controling their sexual urges

both sides of the fence can have sex outside of the stingent rules of the porn industry

both sides can fuck up

one side has a huge amount more risk...

again

who the fuck are you?
 

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
i gave a 1 to 1 comparison

never once singled out gay men for controling their sexual urges

both sides of the fence can have sex outside of the stingent rules of the porn industry

both sides can fuck up

one side has a huge amount more risk...

again

who the fuck are you?
You simply can't admit that you are a homophobic bigot who says that gay men can't be trusted to control their urges, can you?

You may continue your histrionic meltdown.
 
Top