Padawanbater2
Well-Known Member
the funniest part is how convinced the retarded waffle seems to be about all of this, just like beenthere and company were with respect to the unskewed polling nonsense.
That is absolutely the best part
the funniest part is how convinced the retarded waffle seems to be about all of this, just like beenthere and company were with respect to the unskewed polling nonsense.
That is absolutely the best part
That is absolutely the best part
the heartland institute.
The best part, is you care so strongly. That's the mind fuck.
By the way this thread reads, it looks like you and Wavels are the ones with a dog in the fight, and he's been up against the ropes since the bell rang..
These guys are so smug and condescending, that as I have mentioned repeatedly, the inevitable intervention of reality will be so traumatic that the resulting cranial detonations will be quite messy. This is clearly a political tug of war over ideology. The obvious fact that the resident alarmists cannot, or simply refuse to recognize this, is self evident. There is also a forthcoming IPCC report which backpedals significantly regarding ACC. It will be fun to see how they blithely dismiss this as well. This is politics, it has nothing whatsoever to do with any semblance of true science.
smoking isn't harmful, you smug, condescending prick!
Deflect much?
Never smoked cigs, I have a hunch that you do or have? I concluded it was stupid when I first saw the Sugeon General warning on my Mom's packs before you were born.
Explains your resentful bitterness. You were duped into a dopey habit, and you need to blame someone other than yourself. Am I right?
you are aware that the heartland institute that you are so fond of has tried to deny the harmful effects of smoking because they were paid to do so, right?
guess who they're getting paid by now.
go ahead, refuse to learn from history and call me a smug, condescending, bitter prick for laughing at your ignorance.
it only serves to enhance my entertainment value.
Deflect much?
Never smoked cigs, I have a hunch that you do or have? I concluded it was stupid when I first saw the Sugeon General warning on my Mom's packs before you were born.
Explains your resentful bitterness. You were duped into a dopey habit, and you need to blame someone other than yourself. Am I right?
He a 2 pack a day, most likely. All these pics he posts, usually has him with a cig.
He was born after the Surgeon General put the warning on the pack. He sat through DEM Waxman almost getting it labeled as a drug delivery device.
My first act of disobedience (many many to follow,) was to refuse to light a cig for my mom on the stove and carry it to her....maybe I was 7. I knew I was risking the belt. But, I remember the satisfied look on my Dad's face. "Nah, son. Come here. You don't ever have to do that."
The day the Packs came out with the warning, was the day he stopped cold turkey. He needed the following order, excuse, in the smoke drenched Air Force. Then he was able to make fun of them all. "A monkey on your back," he chortled. He is 86 now. A leathered old veteran from WW2.
My mom, never stopped although she lied about it constantly. At 78 she was gone from small cell Lung Cancer, in less than I year.
These guys are so smug and condescending, that as I have mentioned repeatedly, the inevitable intervention of reality will be so traumatic that the resulting cranial detonations will be quite messy. This is clearly a political tug of war over ideology. The obvious fact that the resident alarmists cannot, or simply refuse to recognize this, is self evident. There is also a forthcoming IPCC report which backpedals significantly regarding ACC. It will be fun to see how they blithely dismiss this as well. This is politics, it has nothing whatsoever to do with any semblance of true science.
the heartland institute is evil
Do you not understand why using the heartland institute (what you and Wavels have been using this entire thread) as a source of information regarding climate change is retarded?
It's literally the opposite of science
You're the ones saying the debate is political, duh! We are the ones saying the only debate that exists is in the political arena, there is no debate among scientists about the causes of ACC