Teacher fired for breaking up fight.

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
I would not use force to make two parties interact if one did not want to.
so we have two parties, a white racist who owns a gas station and a black person who wants to buy gas.

the white racist makes money selling gasoline to members of the public. how is he signaling that he does not want to interact with the black member of the public?

if he did not want to interact, why did he open up a gas station that any black member of the public could come buy gas at?
 

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
says the guy who endlessly defends white supremacy.
I'm not defending white supremacy. I would argue just as hard for the right of a Laotian to control his own property and not be made to interact with people that might shit on his floors or really any reason he found valid as long as he didn't try to control your property.


Now don't you feel stupid? No, you don't, because you are.
 

abandonconflict

Well-Known Member
Freedom doesn't require everybody to love one another. It does require everyone to let others live their lives though and not use force to insist on associating. You know that and have nowhere to go. By the way did you enjoy the red herring I speared for you?
Freedom with out equality is tyranny. Having exclusive deed upon what belongs to everyone so that you can discriminate and make profit by taking the excess value of those who are coerced to rent themselves out to you is aggressive and in no way anarchist.

Now I suspect that you will deflect by asking about the philosophy I am not advocating because you utterly fail to defend yours.

Anarchocapitalism (oxymoron) is a philosophy that was thought up by the corporate masters of the capitalist class by the perversion of language. It is privatization of the state apparatus, since capitalism can not exist without a state.

A better name, which is not an oxymoron would be neofeudalism.

All capitalism is crony.
 

londonfog

Well-Known Member
I'm not defending white supremacy. I would argue just as hard for the right of a Laotian to control his own property and not be made to interact with people that might shit on his floors or really any reason he found valid as long as he didn't try to control your property.


Now don't you feel stupid? No, you don't, because you are.
Well your argument has been decided,,,and you are on the losing side.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
I'm not defending white supremacy.
you certainly are.

civil rights didn't come about because white people were being too nice, ya know. it came about because white racists were causing harm to blacks in order to elevate their own status as a race.

your argument is that whites should be allowed to cause harm to blacks, which are "special rights" since causing harm has never been a right, ever.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
So it IS okay to force people to associate?
no one is FORCED to associate.

you'd have a point if private clubs were outlawed and people were not allowed to choose whether to open a public business or a private one. but that ain't how it is, ya white supremacist.

no one is forced to associate because everyone is allowed to open a private club, or to open nothing at all and just sit at home, not associating.

what you want are special rights for whites to cause harm to blacks which existed before civil rights was passed.

sorry, my white supremacist amiga, that ain't allowed anymore. we saw the harm it caused and outlawed it because no one has a right to cause harm.

go cry now.
 

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
Freedom with out equality is tyranny. Having exclusive deed upon what belongs to everyone so that you can discriminate and make profit by taking the excess value of those who are coerced to rent themselves out to you is aggressive and in no way anarchist.

Now I suspect that you will deflect by asking about the philosophy I am not advocating because you utterly fail to defend yours.

Anarchocapitalism (oxymoron) is a philosophy that was thought up by the corporate masters of the capitalist class by the perversion of language. It is privatization of the state apparatus, since capitalism can not exist without a state.

A better name, which is not an oxymoron would be neofeudalism.

All capitalism is crony.

Okay give me back my fucking spear.

Exclusive deed becomes valid when you mix your labor with a natural resource and create something. When did I say I advocate capitalism in any form but that which has the consent of both parties? In other words I reject what passes for the so called free market of today in favor of one absent coercion.
 

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
no one is FORCED to associate.

you'd have a point if private clubs were outlawed and people were not allowed to choose whether to open a public business or a private one. but that ain't how it is, ya white supremacist.

no one is forced to associate because everyone is allowed to open a private club, or to open nothing at all and just sit at home, not associating.

what you want are special rights for whites to cause harm to blacks which existed before civil rights was passed.

sorry, my white supremacist amiga, that ain't allowed anymore. we saw the harm it caused and outlawed it because no one has a right to cause harm.

go cry now.

Really?

How are public schools funded again Mr. Nobody is Forced? Wars? "Free healthcare" ?

Okay. Who has the right to make people associate against their will? Of course this question will be dodged by you. You are quite nimble for a person with a gerbil in his pants.
 

londonfog

Well-Known Member
Really?

How are public schools funded again Mr. Nobody is Forced? Wars? "Free healthcare" ?

Okay. Who has the right to make people associate against their will? Of course this question will be dodged by you. You are quite nimble for a person with a gerbil in his pants.
did you home school your kids. I asked this before, but you never answered. you don't have to .just curious
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Really?

How are public schools funded again Mr. Nobody is Forced?
they are funded by people who voluntarily choose to live in a certain area and pay property taxes there. otherwise they are free to relocate somewhere else without property taxes.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
If there is a threat to a person of a penalty or a loss of their property for not complying with an edict how are they NOT being forced?
because they can open a private club, or open nothing whatsoever and not have to associate with anyone.

are you fucking dumb?
 
Top