UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
Is it time to get laid or something?
from a completely objective standpoint, i can only cringe when wondering about his seduction technique.
Is it time to get laid or something?
your pretty lies have been demolished by the facts.
so sad.
I am right. Here me spew.good job on declaring victory.
i'll post the polls once you start piping up again to defend your victory.
Ghb, ruffies and the trunk of a car? I imagine that would be followed by some 'fuck it' pouring out of the bloodstream (or some such stream) behind a dumpster in an abandoned industrial hellhole. Scary picture indeed. Maybe we should pass the hat for charm school?from a completely objective standpoint, i can only cringe when wondering about his seduction technique.
that wasnt foreign intervention, that was a response to piracy, kidnapping and murder of americans at sea
the mexican american war was a response to attack on us citizens by a foreign power
the spanish american war was a response to brinksmanship and attack on us forces by a foreign power
ww1, ww2 and iraq1 & 2 were wars fought in defense of allies first and foremost.
afghanistan was a response to murder of americans by pirates (they just used planes instead of boats)
all those were well within the ideal of "the discourse of kings"
vietnam, korea, etc were all bullshit though
Ghb, ruffies and the trunk of a car? I imagine that would be followed by some 'fuck it' pouring out of the bloodstream (or some such stream) behind a dumpster in an abandoned industrial hellhole. Scary picture indeed. Maybe we should pass the hat for charm school?
I declare victory.
I have no problems with special forces sneaking in and taking out a Hussein type dictator. We don't need to be investing full scale boots on the ground invasions all over. I'd want it to be covert and we play ignorant instead of thumping our chests.
As far as hunger, we need to figure out why our own war on poverty has been such a dismal failure before we can "help" others. Individually, you can help quite a lot. Our government? not so much.
Based on your post, is it therefore fine for special forces or such sneaking around killing off American diplomats? I'm sure there is a huge number of people in the world who could rationalize that just as you can rationalize taking out Hussein type dictators. This seems to be a big issue with America and many other western countries; they are more than happy to do whatever they please to others, but the moment one of these others retaliates in any way, we cry like little brats and claim not to understand how they could possibly commit such monstrosities.
Based on your post, is it therefore fine for special forces or such sneaking around killing off American diplomats? I'm sure there is a huge number of people in the world who could rationalize that just as you can rationalize taking out Hussein type dictators. This seems to be a big issue with America and many other western countries; they are more than happy to do whatever they please to others, but the moment one of these others retaliates in any way, we cry like little brats and claim not to understand how they could possibly commit such monstrosities.
Where did you learn grammar?I declare you are shriveled prune with bad manners.
that wasnt foreign intervention, that was a response to piracy, kidnapping and murder of americans at sea
the mexican american war was a response to attack on us citizens by a foreign power
the spanish american war was a response to brinksmanship and attack on us forces by a foreign power
ww1, ww2 and iraq1 & 2 were wars fought in defense of allies first and foremost.
afghanistan was a response to murder of americans by pirates (they just used planes instead of boats)
all those were well within the ideal of "the discourse of kings"
vietnam, korea, etc were all bullshit though
It's pretty clear from this that you need professional help. This is by far the most delusion stuff I think I've seen you write to date. Where to start?
The most obvious would be: 'Iraq2' in defense of allies. Really. What ally was being defended? Korean war: 'bullshit'? The U.S. and NATO allies had just watched eastern europe consumed by the Soviet war machine and KGB. Now they were supposed to sit idly by whilst China did it in Asia? If you'd been the age you are now back then, I imagine you would have been screaming for blood.
Your revisionism is shameful.
Where did you learn grammar?
Articles, commas, plurals.
Time for less rocks and more study.
I agree with this post until you got to WW1. Not too bad. You started strong too when you told the neocon he probably got an A in false history.you must have gotten an "A" in False History. in Mexico, we were the foreign power, and they weren't our citizens any longer. the Spanish War was our first Imperial War, and led to the Philippine War, our first "Vietnam." WWI was the Fiat Currency War; WWII, the War to Readjust the Fiat Currency. Vietnam and Korea, just policing the hood, and everything else is Blood for Oil.
know what saying. pronouns unneeded also. good stuff. more SELF-RULE pleaseNo I have plenty of Japanese and Russian now. Articles are useless.