Satellite data proves Earth has not been warming the past 18 years - it's stable

Padawanbater2

Padawanbater2

Well-Known Member
NoDrama said:
I'm sure he does, as I do, which now invalidates that video completely.

They found a correlation between liberals and being easily duped.
Click to expand...
How does that invalidate the fact that there are obvious parallels between climate change denial and evolution denial?
 
N

NoDrama

Well-Known Member
Padawanbater2 said:
How does that invalidate the fact that there are obvious parallels between climate change denial and evolution denial?
Click to expand...
So is it the climate deniers who deny evolution or is the evolution deniers that deny climate change?

And are you sure they deny climate change and just don't deny that climate change is bad or maybe they are denying that it is human made problem. Maybe they are just denying AGW and not climate change at all? The video seems to lump these all together in order to make a false point even falsier.
 
Padawanbater2

Padawanbater2

Well-Known Member
NoDrama said:
So is it the climate deniers who deny evolution or is the evolution deniers that deny climate change?

And are you sure they deny climate change and just don't deny that climate change is bad or maybe they are denying that it is human made problem. Maybe they are just denying AGW and not climate change at all? The video seems to lump these all together in order to make a false point even falsier.
Click to expand...
The scientific consensus of climate change has been posted multiple times. If you deny it, you deny the scientific consensus on climate change
 
N

NoDrama

Well-Known Member
Padawanbater2 said:

Owned

Every bullshit talking point defeated in 17 minutes from a scientist who actually studies the climate
Click to expand...
His first talking point is that Venus is much hotter than Earth because of a high level of CO2 in the atmosphere.
I guess the fact that Venus is 30% closer to the sun than earth is doesn't matter?

Mercury has the thinnest atmosphere of all the planets, yet it can get up to 900F there also.

BECAUSE ITS CLOSER TO THE FUCKING SUN!!
 
N

NoDrama

Well-Known Member
Padawanbater2 said:
The scientific consensus of climate change has been posted multiple times. If you deny it, you deny the scientific consensus on climate change
Click to expand...
That doesn't answer ANY of my questions, nor is it even a reply to my post. One must wonder why you chose to quote it? Perhaps you are mentally unstable?
 
Padawanbater2

Padawanbater2

Well-Known Member
NoDrama said:
His first talking point is that Venus is much hotter than Earth because of a high level of CO2 in the atmosphere.
I guess the fact that Venus is 30% closer to the sun than earth is doesn't matter?

Mercury has the thinnest atmosphere of all the planets, yet it can get up to 900F there also.

BECAUSE ITS CLOSER TO THE FUCKING SUN!!
Click to expand...
Venus is warmer than Mercury, Mercury is the closest planet to the Sun. Venus is the hottest planet on average because its atmosphere is made up mostly of carbon dioxide
 
Padawanbater2

Padawanbater2

Well-Known Member
NoDrama said:
That doesn't answer ANY of my questions, nor is it even a reply to my post. One must wonder why you chose to quote it? Perhaps you are mentally unstable?
Click to expand...
NoDrama said:
So is it the climate deniers who deny evolution or is the evolution deniers that deny climate change?

And are you sure they deny climate change and just don't deny that climate change is bad or maybe they are denying that it is human made problem. Maybe they are just denying AGW and not climate change at all? The video seems to lump these all together in order to make a false point even falsier.
Click to expand...
Denying either theory would likely lead someone to deny the other because of their ideological and political values. Just like most evolution deniers and ACC deniers would be religious, conservative, hold traditional values, etc.. there are things that can positively be said about such people with a high degree of accuracy, they fit the stereotype

-they deny climate change is bad
-they deny that humans are responsible, and to what degree
-nobody on either side is denying the climate naturally changes

The scientific consensus says 1) the climate is changing, 2) humans are responsible, 3) it would be in everyones best interest to act accordingly as soon as possible
 
B

BigNBushy

Well-Known Member
Padawanbater2 said:
Get the fuck right out of here with this bullshit. This very thread you told me both of my jobs were shit because I had them simultaneously.

If you can't take it from Buck, don't dish it out like the glaring hypocrite you are

You blame all your problems on poor people, you disgusting rat of a human being
Click to expand...
Where have I blamed one single poor person, or any person for any problems that I may or may not have?

Pada, how do you define good job? It certainly has more to it, but providing you with the means to support yourself is the obvious first criteria.

If either of your jobs enabled you to support yourself, you would get rid of the other.

So if a job isn't a good job, it is a not good job.

I do admire anyone willing to work two jobs, but you probably think all your bosses are idiots.
 
Red1966

Red1966

Well-Known Member
Padawanbater2 said:
Quote the post where I called you an idiot for saying water vapor had a greenhouse effect

I never said my understanding was "so advanced", I sure as hell know a lot more than any of the denialists about science and ACC, that's demonstrable, and it's hilarious seeing you absolute retards claiming some faux-victory when the entire rest of the world is sitting here laughing at you

One more thing, I haven't been unemployed in 7 years, dipshit, and for 2 of those years I had 2 jobs simultaneously, neither of which were for minimum wage
Click to expand...
Yet, you never were able to earn $900 in a month. Conviction doesn't equal knowledge, But, you know, science.....
 
Padawanbater2

Padawanbater2

Well-Known Member
BigNBushy said:
Where have I blamed one single poor person, or any person for any problems that I may or may not have?

Pada, how do you define good job? It certainly has more to it, but providing you with the means to support yourself is the obvious first criteria.

If either of your jobs enabled you to support yourself, you would get rid of the other.

So if a job isn't a good job, it is a not good job.

I do admire anyone willing to work two jobs, but you probably think all your bosses are idiots.
Click to expand...
I think you are an idiot
 
Red1966

Red1966

Well-Known Member
Padawanbater2 said:
People like you say shit like "go to school, get another job, pull yourself up, blah blah blah", then as soon as someone does, people like you say shit like this "if you had 2 jobs both of them sucked".

People like you are simply so far out of touch with reality there's no point in discussing these things with you because you're not equipped with the basic skills needed to maintain the conversation

People like you, Kynes, and a handful of other members who have nothing better to do with their time than come into the politics section every single day and see what they can bitch about next

People like you could vanish off the face of the Earth and the only thing that would happen is that it would get better
Click to expand...
"People like you, Kynes, and a handful of other members who have nothing better to do with their time than come into the politics section every single day and see what they can bitch about next" <definition of irony.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top