Arkansas state senator Bart Hester gets owned trying to defend 'religious freedom' bill

[Padawanbater2]

Yes. I fully support our constitutional form of government. You are free to associate with whomever (whoever?) you want.

That would be against the Constitution, nit-wit

Bars, son.

 

[desert dude]

That would be against the Constitution, nit-wit

Bars, son.

Destroying the constitution is the progressive agenda. Many who value individual freedom are fighting to keep the the US a free, constitutional republic. We'll see who wins in due time.

 

[Padawanbater2]

Destroying the constitution is the progressive agenda. Many who value individual freedom are fighting to keep the the US a free, constitutional republic. We'll see who wins in due time.

You're the one that just admitted you would support a law that effectively eliminates the 1st amendment to the Constitution..

Do you ever think before you try to make a point or just blab out whatever comes to your mind first?

 

[desert dude]

You're the one that just admitted you would support a law that effectively eliminates the 1st amendment to the Constitution..

Do you ever think before you try to make a point or just blab out whatever comes to your mind first?

It's clear that you don't have the first clue what 1A means. You seem to think the government gets to mandate that I associate with Christians. It doesn't. Nor does it mean that I cannot associate with Christians. "Free association" means that I am free to associate with whomever I choose, and for whatever reasons I choose.

 

[desert dude]

Why do progressives loathe the constitution? Is it because it's "like 200 years old, dude, and was written by white guys."?

 

[UncleBuck]

Destroying the constitution is the progressive agenda. Many who value individual freedom are fighting to keep the the US a free, constitutional republic. We'll see who wins in due time.

save the rhetoric for your klan chapter.

 

[UncleBuck]

It's clear that you don't have the first clue what 1A means. You seem to think the government gets to mandate that I associate with Christians. It doesn't. Nor does it mean that I cannot associate with Christians. "Free association" means that I am free to associate with whomever I choose, and for whatever reasons I choose.

the supreme court didn't see it that way when they tried civil rights. they certainly don't think you're entitled to kick black people out of your store, even though we all know that is what you would like to do.

why did you join a white supremacy group?

 

[desert dude]

Psychiatric counseling is an option, Buck.

 

[UncleBuck]

Why do progressives loathe the constitution? Is it because it's "like 200 years old, dude, and was written by white guys."?

do you support the equal protection clause of the 14th amendment?

 

[UncleBuck]

Psychiatric counseling is an option, Buck.

why did you join a white supremacy group though?

 

[desert dude]

Buck, you are a strange little weirdo. Counseling might help.

 

[UncleBuck]

Buck, you are a strange little weirdo. Counseling might help.

seriously though, why did you join a white supremacy group?

 

[Padawanbater2]

It's clear that you don't have the first clue what 1A means. You seem to think the government gets to mandate that I associate with Christians. It doesn't. Nor does it mean that I cannot associate with Christians. "Free association" means that I am free to associate with whomever I choose, and for whatever reasons I choose.

You just said you would support a law that would allow me to deny the sale of goods/services to Christians based on my religious beliefs and you don't think that goes against the Constitution?

Why don't religious people have the right to discriminate against black people based on their religious beliefs?

 

[Red1966]

Answer the question. If I as a business owner denied Christians the sale of goods/services because it's against my religious belief, would you support that position or not?

I would. Well. not you, but someone else. YOU should be forced to serve everyone because you like to force people to your desires. Let's be honest here, you'll never own a business. You couldn't even manage a paper route.

 

[Red1966]

You just said you would support a law that would allow me to deny the sale of goods/services to Christians based on my religious beliefs and you don't think that goes against the Constitution?

Why don't religious people have the right to discriminate against black people based on their religious beliefs?

You aren't asking about the sale of goods and services, tho. You're demanding the participation and attendence. Totaly different.

 

[Padawanbater2]

I would. Well. not you, but someone else. YOU should be forced to serve everyone because you like to force people to your desires. Let's be honest here, you'll never own a business. You couldn't even manage a paper route.

What's the difference between denying the sale of goods/services to someone based on their skin color with denying the sale of goods/services to someone based on their sexual orientation or identity?

 

[Red1966]

That would be against the Constitution, nit-wit


Bars, son.

Er, no.

 

[Padawanbater2]

You aren't asking about the sale of goods and services, tho. You're demanding the participation and attendence. Totaly different.

Do you think it's OK for a religious business owner to deny the sale of goods/services to someone because he is gay?

 

[Red1966]

What's the difference between denying the sale of goods/services to someone based on their skin color with denying the sale of goods/services to someone based on their sexual orientation or identity?

You're demanding the attendance and participation, not the sale.

 

[Padawanbater2]

Er, no.

You don't think discriminating against someone based on their religion is against the Constitution?