isnt it strange how this debate goes on and on and on yet there is no mention of the fact that the HPS in these tests diminished in intensity at almost the same rate as the LEDs(suggesting that having multiple light sources closer to the canopy is going to get the best penetration)
AND the fact that the illumitex fixture showed very little loss of ppf while distance was increased (optics people)and blew the others away completely in that respect has not been mentioned at all?
growers house also have a test which demonstrates this- watch the vid
http://growershouse.com/blog/illumitex-neosol-ds-led-grow-light-review-test/
http://growershouse.com/images/PDFs/chart_neosolDS.pdf
not to mention all these fixtures(other than the illlumitex) are single source light points(ok the monons are multiple but still packed into a small area, not spread out as we do with our cob builds) and measuremenst were taken directly below the light source
so if anything the take away from that vid should be to use spread out light sources with optics for even ppfd and good penetration
the illumitex chips run at 5w each and convert to 1.7 umols per watt
cobs we run 50w each convert at around 2.5 umols per watt
DE is 1.7 also?