mahiluana
Well-Known Member
.energy is used to create light or heat
![Peace :peace: :peace:](/styles/smilies/peace.gif)
To measure radiant power is a complicate and expensive thing.
And it is not always granted to receive perfectly calibrated results.
So why shouldn`t we measure the heat power directly with a US$ 20,- equipment
to get even more accurates results ?
I know the answer since I asked a certified institute here at the university of my town,
to measure my watercooled led light for lumens and heat output, to certify energy efficacy.
Mr. Dr.-Ing. Trampert , responsable for laboratory-department replied, that his lighting institute lacks the possibility to measure heat power.
A doctor in physics ?
teaching students of his faculty ?
unable to measure the heat of a water bucket ? --- ???
Our planet will die because of stupidity, ignorance and arrogance.
![Hit Wall :wall: :wall:](/styles/smilies/wall.gif)
![Fire Devil :fire: :fire:](/styles/smilies/FIREdevil.gif)
![Dunce :dunce: :dunce:](/styles/smilies/dunce.gif)
![Dunce :dunce: :dunce:](/styles/smilies/dunce.gif)
![Dunce :dunce: :dunce:](/styles/smilies/dunce.gif)
time is unimportant
I don`t have a stabilized system - Vf, If, radiant flux will change with rising temperature, which depends on time and the amount of water.before the system stabilized
- But this is not a problem as long as you integrate your results , to receive an average amount of electricity, heat and light.
![Red Eye :eyesmoke: :eyesmoke:](/styles/smilies/redeyesmoke.gif)