UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
Does the worst candidate ever usually get more votes than any white male ever has?Psst- the presidency is determined by the electoral college. Know the rules.
Does the worst candidate ever usually get more votes than any white male ever has?Psst- the presidency is determined by the electoral college. Know the rules.
Elections are about winning. Worst candidate is always the loser. Hillary = Loser.Does the worst candidate ever usually get more votes than any white male ever has?
Does the worst candidate ever usually get more votes than any white male ever?Elections are about winning. Worst candidate is always the loser. Hillary = Loser.
She lost to Trump. Enough said.Does the worst candidate ever usually get more votes than any white male ever?
Does the worst candidate ever usually get more votes than any white male ever hasShe lost to Trump. Enough said.
Irrelevant. She lost. To Trump. QEDDoes the worst candidate ever usually get more votes than any white male ever has
Ted Cruz is a cunt.you know, at this point, we could do worse....hell, at this point, we ARE doing worse
if they could give Ted Cruz an infusion of Dwayne's charisma.........
Does the worst candidate ever usually get more votes than any white male ever has?Irrelevant. She lost. To Trump. QED
asked and answered. Please don't spam.Does the worst candidate ever usually get more votes than any white male ever has?
Who gets more votes is relevant to who the worst candidate isasked and answered. Please don't spam.
Popular vote count is not relevant in a presidential election. Here you go:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Electoral_CollegeWho gets more votes is relevant to who the worst candidate is
Does the worst candidate ever usually get more votes than any white male ever has
Looks like many other candidates got far fewer electoral votes than “the worst candidate ever”Popular vote count is not relevant in a presidential election. Here you go:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Electoral_College
asked and answered, reported as spamLooks like many other candidates got far fewer electoral votes than “the worst candidate ever”
Does the worst candidate ever usually get more votes than any white male ever has?
It doesn't really matter if she is getting 120% of California population in votesLooks like many other candidates got far fewer electoral votes than “the worst candidate ever”
Does the worst candidate ever usually get more votes than any white male ever has?
It doesn't really matter if she is getting 120% of California population in votes![]()
He's a million percent sure120%? Impossible.
Oh, I get it. Another lying conspiracy spreader.
Got proof? Didn't think so.
We can change that with an Executive Order.Popular vote count is not relevant in a presidential election. Here you go:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Electoral_College
It doesn't really matter if she is getting 120% of California population in votes![]()
Orange County hadn't voted a Democrat for 80 years and magically voted for Hillary, the only one who could lose to Trump.
If you take away her landslide victories in CA and NY she no longer has an edge in the popular vote. This was the exact issue the founders had. They felt it unfair one one or two states could decide the fate of the whole country.
So, take away 2 states you don't like and we'll just go by the rest then.
Fucking brilliant.