Oh Goodie! ... More on 911 (inside job) :)

[NoDrama]

i saw an interview of dudes who did loose change. they themselves said some of their shit was wrong. this is why there is a "2nd" edition.



i can't believe everything these people believe is based on one movie.

I haven't even seen the movie, Have you?

 

[Miss MeanWeed]

dude theres many photos of the rescue much closer than the 500 feet your truther buddies only wanna show you


ok heres one to start:


there a lot of people there huh? they were all in on it right? cuz they were sent there to pic up the pieces and investigate, but they all noticed there was no plane and not a single one of them said anything !!!!!!!! right?

ok if you notice the plane crashed with 1 wing tilting down almost hitting the ground, that means the other wing was tilted up. from the picture above you can see a high diagonal charmark from the wing pointing hi on the left and the low diagonal charr mark on the right from the other wing pointing down. then in the center you see the hole the plane body went through which then later collapes into a larger hole.

hey what that up there smart guy???? looks like a plane to me

ok here another little piece

and here is more wreckage of the plane including luggage of the passengers

any questions???????????



NEXT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I'm sorry but that is preposterous.

All official doctrine on the Pentagon plane refers to it's nearly horizontal slightly left tilting positioning upon entry, as any angle would have left marks in the lawn or thrown the remainder of the high wing and/or it's engine over the outer ring wall.

I imagine you have seen black burn marks on the exterior of the pentagon and joined the dots to conclude that charring = impact points. That would be like a cartoon, with the nose cone and landing gear punching a nice round exit hole, and the wings and engines vaporising on impact.

http://fire.nist.gov/bfrlpubs/build03/PDF/b03017.pdf for a clearer picture.

 

[Big P]

I'm sorry but that is preposterous.

All official doctrine on the Pentagon plane refers to it's nearly horizontal slightly left tilting positioning upon entry, as any angle would have left marks in the lawn or thrown the remainder of the high wing and/or it's engine over the outer ring wall.

I imagine you have seen black burn marks on the exterior of the pentagon and joined the dots to conclude that charring = impact points. That would be like a cartoon, with the nose cone and landing gear punching a nice round exit hole, and the wings and engines vaporising on impact.

http://fire.nist.gov/bfrlpubs/build03/PDF/b03017.pdf for a clearer picture.

just saying more than 100 people watched the plane fly into the pentagon with thier own eyes

you think you could convince them it wasnt a plane?


i dont understand how you guys cant see how redicules your no plane theory is, i mean if you logically thought it through and all

 

[CrackerJax]

Because youtube defeats eye witnesses .... as long as the viewers aren't very bright.

 

[Wavels]

Wowee...
This is like the little thread that could...I think I can, I think I can!

 

[fdd2blk]

where'd they all go?

 

[Hayduke]

I'm sorry but that is preposterous.

All official doctrine on the Pentagon plane refers to it's nearly horizontal slightly left tilting positioning upon entry, as any angle would have left marks in the lawn or thrown the remainder of the high wing and/or it's engine over the outer ring wall.

I imagine you have seen black burn marks on the exterior of the pentagon and joined the dots to conclude that charring = impact points. That would be like a cartoon, with the nose cone and landing gear punching a nice round exit hole, and the wings and engines vaporising on impact.

http://fire.nist.gov/bfrlpubs/build03/PDF/b03017.pdf for a clearer picture.

Good point(s)...vaporizing steel and titanium and intact humans strapped in their seats

And please!!!!...t-h-e-i-r....not t-h-i-e-r!!!!!!!!if you type in blue...and what you type is underlined
in red...on the white page...it is not your computers way of telling you how patriotic you are!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 

[fdd2blk]

Good point(s)...vaporizing steel and titanium and intact humans strapped in their seats

And please!!!!...t-h-e-i-r....not t-h-i-e-r!!!!!!!!if you type in blue...and what you type is underlined
in red...on the white page...it is not your computers way of telling you how patriotic you are!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

so it's either everything was vaporized, or nothing at all?

do people really not get it? or are they just being thick?

 

["SICC"]

Hes just stating that if mostly everything vaporized, its kinda hard to believe that 2 bodies would still be left, not saying it couldn't happened, but the odd's of it happening are pretty low

maybe you should think some more before trying to disprove everyone right off the back

 

[fdd2blk]

why couldn't things not be vaporized. why does one have to believe everything was vaporized. is it really hard to see this? some shit was vaporized, some wasn't.

are we really arguing/explaining this.



i came into this thread "undecided". i feel stupid for ever questioning any of it now.

thanks to the OP for setting me straight, i was thinking crazy.

 

[fdd2blk]

[QUOTE="SICC";3726215]Hes just stating that if mostly everything vaporized, its kinda hard to believe that 2 bodies would still be left, not saying it couldn't happened, but the odd's of it happening are pretty low

maybe you should think some more before trying to disprove everyone right off the back[/QUOTE]


it's "right off the bat" since we are being spelling nazi's. http://www.yourdictionary.com/idioms/right-off-the-bat



and is it really that hard to believe? when you are already believing all the other BS? you can't believe this though?


gtfo

 

["SICC"]

[QUOTE="SICC";3726215]Hes just stating that if mostly everything vaporized, its kinda hard to believe that 2 bodies would still be left, not saying it couldn't happen, but the odd's of it happening are pretty low

maybe you should think some more before trying to disprove everyone right off the back[/QUOTE]

here maybe that will help you, you read what you want to hear, then you just fire off lol


EDIT: LOL i knew i said it wrong

 

[fdd2blk]

[QUOTE="SICC";3726237]here maybe that will help you, you read what you want to hear, then you just fire off lol


EDIT: LOL i knew i said it wrong [/QUOTE]


and what are you doing? posting 1 minute after me.

i know what i'm saying. do you? no.

 

["SICC"]

So because i a said a phrase wrong, what ever i say now is not credible, right FDD.... how is the weather up there?

 

[fdd2blk]

[QUOTE="SICC";3726253]So because i a said a phrase wrong, what ever i say now is not credible, right FDD.... how is the weather up there? [/QUOTE]

you obviously have NOT been paying attention.

 

[Hayduke]

it's "right off the bat" since we are being spelling nazi's. http://www.yourdictionary.com/idioms/right-off-the-bat



and is it really that hard to believe? when you are already believing all the other BS? you can't believe this though?


gtfo

A while back...someone was nailing keenly on every grammatical error/typo possible...makes me a little nervous of being belittled also...I thought that person was you...I guess I must be mistaken, and apologize

Everyone makes typos, spelling and grammar errors...and most people occasionally mix up their, they're, and there...some more than others and is often associated with less formal education and that is cool also...but those people NEVER call other members stupid. Habitually misspelling simple words while at the same time calling every person who does not agree with them and the handful of witnesses morons, idiots, stupid, thick, and insinuate that others do not love their country seems...well...

If you came to this thread undecided...how in the world could a handful of people whom you do not respect...solidify in your mind that either the lie that is the official report is the truth, or that it is ok to lie to the people?

 

[fdd2blk]

Exactly. Again...I do not know what happened, it's just that the BS meter goes off too often with the official story. Of course it is plausible that some parts vaporized while others did not (though this was not the story with fdd's F4 example hitting reinforced concrete...similar to the pentagon.

However it would seem like things of greater mass would survive the vaporization like the landing gear...but human bodies, essentially bags of water...and then there is the large unburnt pieces of fuselage (light aluminum...same as the f4) that did not vaporize, but the majority of both engines did.



A while back...someone was nailing keenly on every grammatical error/typo possible...makes me a little nervous of being belittled also...I thought that person was you...I guess I must be mistaken, and apologize

Everyone makes typos, spelling and grammar errors...and most people occasionally mix up their, they're, and there...some more than others and is often associated with less formal education and that is cool also...but those people NEVER call other members stupid. Habitually misspelling simple words while at the same time calling every person who does not agree with them and the handful of witnesses morons, idiots, stupid, thick, and insinuate that others do not love their country seems...well...

If you came to this thread undecided...how in the world could a handful of people whom you do not respect...solidify in your mind that either the lie that is the official report is the truth, or that it is ok to lie to the people?

because i have been watching and reading all the links. i actually learned something.


sorry if my playful jabs offend your tender verginer.
good to see you can poke about the spelling, even being wrong. but when it happens to you it's offensive.

 

[Dr. Greenhorn]

tender verginer? lol what's a tender verginer?

 

[fdd2blk]

tender verginer? lol what's a tender verginer?

it's that thing that's got the sand all over it.

 

[Hayduke]

because i have been watching and reading all the links. i actually learned something. I ask a question...so I am a dunce...


sorry if my playful jabs offend your tender verginer.
good to see you can poke about the spelling, even being wrong. but when it happens to you it's offensive.

The offensive part is the name calling...not spelling.

When I said that pointing out every single error made by one member made me...whatever I said...I meant I was trying to not be the butt of your "playful jabs", only because I respect your skills as a grower, breeder, and glass blower and was trying to not end up categorized as an idiot (though I am quite sure my questioning nature solidified this already) as I occasionally need some good advice, and you are one of the few (who are still here) that I trust with growing advice...I also like some of your glass and love the Hijack "A".

Sorry my verginer is not as rough and tough as yours...I will work on that