BadDog40
Well-Known Member
baddog, sorry you've had bad experiences, but lumping all dispensaries together would be like me calling you a caregiver that is only in it for the $$ you make illegally selling on the back end. I don't know you and you don't know me. so don't make assumptions that make you look like the ass.
One does not need to make 'assumptions' as you say to know the intent of CMMR pre-1284 and the $1.4 million they raised SOLELY from dispensaries in order to have their lobbyists push for a monopoly in this industry. Nor does one need to make assumptions when a dispensary owner was whining at a DOR meeting complaining about caregivers selling $200 ounces on Craigslist. Very few dispensaries were against 1284 and the ones that were got out of it like myself, Kathleen Chippi, and a few others did. We've been paving this road for over 25 years with the sole purpose of removing oppressive laws, NOT so a few of you can corner the market while shutting everyone else out. And your statement about caregivers selling illegally on the backend is complete hypocrisy considering that what you are doing is not only still illegal on the Federal level but was also questionable pre-1284. Don't act like such a fucking saint.
besides, you obviously don't have enough knowledge to make an informed remark. do you know how many shops are failing because of bad management or bad growers? if those same Disp with sucky growers was instead able to obtain high quality meds from a caregiver (eg:like Cali allows) then they wouldn't be failing. but they must stick with the 70/30 rule, and therefor will fail. So why would those disp. want to cut out the caregiver? just one example of many, why your logic fails.
You are funny, you make it sound like dispensaries and CMMR had nothing to do with 1284, is that your contention? A lot of dispensaries are now feeling the reality of 1284 but that doesnt mean they didnt think it was a good idea at the time. Sounds like buyers remorse.