Two Americas ...

[john.roberts85]

What did you expect? As I said from my post, go use the RIU search engine and look up all my posts and you shall be enlightened.

The list of things he has accomplished are way to many for me to originally put into my own description for your sake, sorry, but your not that important.

You asked a simple question, I gave you an answer, don't pout because I didn't throw it all into my own words, I even cited the website I found it. Go ahead try to nick-pick all the list, you might find out a find or two about our president, or worse yet! you might even give him credit, oh God not that! MUST AVERT EYES!!!

For some twisted reason, you assume I'm a Democrat or a liberal who hates George Bush but loves either of the Clintons, Obama, Carter, Gore, Johnson, or some other Democrat or politician. Why is that? In your world does one person have to be in lock step with a party or a politician? Do you believe in or agree with the whole list that was originally created by someone else? If so, who is the sheep? My point was, and still is, that bringing up SAT scores of a president doesn't appeal to most people about their level of intelligence. If you were to say that Bill Gates, Milton Friedman or Richard Feynman were idiotic, SAT scores wouldn't even need to be in the equation. Would they?

 

[john.roberts85]

Do you not remember that the Senator would not allow bush to bring in federal support because they could handle it on their own. That is why it took four or five days for federal support to come into new orleans. get your facts straight.

A Senator wouldn't allow Bush to bring in federal support? Would that be Senator Zeus representing Mt. Olympus? Did he keep him at bay with the lighting bolt in his right hand?

 

[ZenMaster]

For some twisted reason, you assume I'm a Democrat or a liberal who hates George Bush but loves either of the Clintons, Obama, Carter, Gore, Johnson, or some other Democrat or politician. Why is that? In your world does one person have to be in lock step with a party or a politician? Do you believe in or agree with the whole list that was originally created by someone else? If so, who is the sheep? My point was, and still is, that bringing up SAT scores of a president doesn't appeal to most people about their level of intelligence. If you were to say that Bill Gates, Milton Friedman or Richard Feynman were idiotic, SAT scores wouldn't even need to be in the equation. Would they?

First off, I didn't bring up the damn SAT scores, but I understood why another poster did. It was because Med was calling Bush a moron, and that simply is not true. Satisfied?

I do not give a shit which party your affiliated with, but if your going to slander Bush and directly ask what he has done for this country, you shall receive justification.

I do not believe you have even read the entire list nor do I expect you to, but I have and they are quoting direct bills and actions he has performed in office. Yes, some go into more detail of his standings, but most on that list is pure fact. That is why I challenge you to go read up on what Bush has passed from any source you wish.

 

[john.roberts85]

First off, I didn't bring up the damn SAT scores, but I understood why another poster did. It was because Med was calling Bush a moron, and that simply is not true. Satisfied?

I do not give a shit which party your affiliated with, but if your going to slander Bush and directly ask what he has done for this country, you shall receive justification.

I do not believe you have even read the entire list nor do I expect you to, but I have and they are quoting direct bills and actions he has performed in office. Yes, some go into more detail of his standings, but most on that list is pure fact. That is why I challenge you to go read up on what Bush has passed from any source you wish.

First off, I never claimed you brought up the SAT scores. Secondly, you do realize that slander is spoken; the word you're looking for is libel. It's not relevant because I didn't do either of those. Thirdly, I read it and a lot of it is positions he takes, not accomplishments. Not to mention "accomplishments" that have since been altered. It says he accomplished to get Republican gains in Congress. Since then, did he accomplish to lose those seats? Such grand accomplishments.

 

[ZenMaster]

First off, I never claimed you brought up the SAT scores. Secondly, you do realize that slander is spoken; the word you're looking for is libel. It's not relevant because I didn't do either of those. Thirdly, I read it and a lot of it is positions he takes, not accomplishments. Not to mention "accomplishments" that have since been altered. It says he accomplished to get Republican gains in Congress. Since then, did he accomplish to lose those seats? Such grand accomplishments.

The "accomplishment" of the Democratic control of Congress is credited directly to Media spin and biased views. Sadly enough, uneducated Americans are spoon-fed this propaganda CNN, MSN, ABC, NBC spew out in effort to gain numbers to their party.

 

[john.roberts85]

The "accomplishment" of the Democratic control of Congress is credited directly to Media spin and biased views. Sadly enough, uneducated Americans are spoon-fed this propaganda CNN, MSN, ABC, NBC spew out in effort to gain numbers to their party.

There's no doubt that most major outlets are slightly left of center, but we're all products of propaganda.

 

[medicineman]

There's no doubt that most major outlets are slightly left of center, but we're all products of propaganda.

Actually, with ownership of 95% of media being owned by 5-7 corporations, I believe the right viewpoints are overtaking the left in leaps and bounds. Many left leaning pundits have lost their jobs in the last couple of years, in fact, the only one I know of on cable or MSM is Kieth Olberman. The rest have been corporatized. Even Lou Dobbs is leaning right, taking up with John McCain, revolting. BTW you heathens need to lighten up on Grow Rebel, I am a huge fan of hers.