Defender of the Constitution, could win it all!

It is chopped up, its clearly an edited video lol, I did not edit that part out it still says that...

Now if you would like, provide an example of a point Mr Russert made that you think was valid and relevant and I will explain to you why its ridiculous long hand, because there is not one valid point made here, its all dirty political tactics(twisting of words etc...)...Not one relevant point is made..
 
05-04-2012, 12:50 PM
Last edited by deprave; 05-04-2012 at 01:28 PM.
05-04-2012, 01:58 PM
Last edited by deprave; 05-04-2012 at 02:01 PM.
05-04-2012, 02:02 PM
Last edited by deprave; 05-04-2012 at 02:05 PM.

yeah im done with this
 
05-04-2012, 12:50 PM
Last edited by deprave; 05-04-2012 at 01:28 PM.
05-04-2012, 01:58 PM
Last edited by deprave; 05-04-2012 at 02:01 PM.
05-04-2012, 02:02 PM
Last edited by deprave; 05-04-2012 at 02:05 PM.

yeah im done with this

You just experienced the Paulbot version of, "La la la, I can't hear you!!!"
 
When you are a congressman you are king and ruler of all your domain? I was just wondering cuz you guys love to point out that his district gets federal money. Like each congressperson is the one who decides where the money goes. You people have no clue how government works do you?\

I love how the interview states in big red letters across the screen "Ron Paul received $4 Billion dollars...."

LMAO Ron Paul received $4 billion? Really? Wow he sure is a rich man, why would the Feds give a congressman $4 billion. Oh wait, you mean the Feds gave his district $4 billion and RP didn't really receive any of it? the truth is funny sometimes and all you RP haters are barely using your brains.

Sometimes I wonder if any of you know what it is that congresspeople actually do, you know, what their job is that they are voted to do? Any of you idiots know what they do? Its pretty obvious that none of you have a single clue.
 
When you are a congressman you are king and ruler of all your domain? I was just wondering cuz you guys love to point out that his district gets federal money. Like each congressperson is the one who decides where the money goes. You people have no clue how government works do you?\

I love how the interview states in big red letters across the screen "Ron Paul received $4 Billion dollars...."

LMAO Ron Paul received $4 billion? Really? Wow he sure is a rich man, why would the Feds give a congressman $4 billion. Oh wait, you mean the Feds gave his district $4 billion and RP didn't really receive any of it? the truth is funny sometimes and all you RP haters are barely using your brains.

Sometimes I wonder if any of you know what it is that congresspeople actually do, you know, what their job is that they are voted to do? Any of you idiots know what they do? Its pretty obvious that none of you have a single clue.

hypocrite is a hypocrite

[video=youtube;BNsrK6P9QvI]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BNsrK6P9QvI[/video]
 
How can you be against earmarks but still do them yourself...:confused: Thats like being against weed, but still grow it
 
How can you be against earmarks but still do them yourself...:confused: Thats like being against weed, but still grow it

If you knew what you were talking about you would know that he isn't against earmarks, I also have a strange feeling that you don't understand earmarks.
 
If you knew what you were talking about you would know that he isn't against earmarks, I also have a strange feeling that you don't understand earmarks.
“I’ve never voted for an earmark in my life.”
-- Remark by Paul on NBC’s “Meet the Press,” Dec. 23, 2007
 
“I’ve never voted for an earmark in my life.”
-- Remark by Paul on NBC’s “Meet the Press,” Dec. 23, 2007

he sticks them in there, votes against them knowing they will pass, and runs off with the money.
 
“I’ve never voted for an earmark in my life.”
-- Remark by Paul on NBC’s “Meet the Press,” Dec. 23, 2007

Paul will make the earmark request, but then votes against or abstains from voting on final passage, so it is true, he has "never voted for an earmark", even the earmark requests he himself made. Ron Paul does this because the the system is not perfect, If the bill passes regardless of his vote then this money is going out anyway and if his State is in dire need of having a road fixed or something, he’ll try to get something back for the people he represents. Dr Paul doesn't want the money to go out but if it is going to go out then he wants it all accounted for. (That would kind of be his job and stuff ya know)

Whats even more ironic about this being combined with the FEMA arguement is the large ammount of money Paul has appropriated for disaster relief.
 
Paul typically will make the earmark request, but then votes against or abstains from voting on final passage, so he can maintain his claim to have "never voted for an earmark", even the earmark requests he himself made.

talk about speaking out of both sides of your mouth and purposely deceiving people.

ronnie the bigot is a lying politician supreme.
 
sheep-off-cliff.jpg
 
talk about speaking out of both sides of your mouth and purposely deceiving people.

ronnie the bigot is a lying politician supreme.

Good one, you get that out of a cracker jack box? I think I explained it well enough, its not being a "bigot" its that he votes against more spending but if more spending is passed then he wants it spent appropriately, what else is he going to do? Stomp his feet and yell "bigot"...no that only works for you on an internet forums.
 
talk about speaking out of both sides of your mouth and purposely deceiving people.

ronnie the bigot is a lying politician supreme.
I think he was trying to have his cake and eat it too... er... have his turtle and fuck it too? At any rate, when you do something like that you usually end up looking like a hypocrite. This is no exception.
 
I think he was trying to have his cake and eat it too... er... have his turtle and fuck it too? At any rate, when you do something like that you usually end up looking like a hypocrite. This is no exception.

Key Phrase "Looking Like"..but is he...no? he is doing what is right to represent the people..Actually this is a fine example on how Ron Paul is not your typical politician playing politics at the peoples expense.
 
Good one, you get that out of a cracker jack box? I think I explained it well enough, its not being a "bigot" its that he votes against more spending but if more spending is passed then he wants it spent appropriately, what else is he going to do? Stomp his feet and yell "bigot"...no that only works for you on an internet forums.

the bigot part comes from him writing bigoted bills and calling homosexuality unacceptable.

if he truly hated earmarks and spending so much, he wouldn't sneak so many of them in for himself. turns out he loves earmarks and spending, just not voting for it.

porkulus king ronnie the bigot.
 
the bigot part comes from him writing bigoted bills and calling homosexuality unacceptable.

if he truly hated earmarks and spending so much, he wouldn't sneak so many of them in for himself. turns out he loves earmarks and spending, just not voting for it.

porkulus king ronnie the bigot.
Do you not know what an earmark is?

Also do you not know what a bill "summary" is?


Now, since you have been defeated and resulted to childlike Name calling and feet stomping lets get back to the video, please name one relevant point...Not one of you has been able to produce one relevant point..(hint: You can't because there isn't one in this video) You guys seem to think this is "THE VIDEO"
 
Back
Top