trayvan martin

afrawfraw

Well-Known Member
Water is the number 1 industrial solvent used in the world. Water kills people.
What's your point? That water was designed to kill?

Sugar kills people.
Knives kill people.
Cars kill people.

But that is not their sole purpose.

Again, I'm waiting for someone to tell me, "I use my rifle as a broom." or ,"I use my side arm as a paper weight."
 

ginjawarrior

Well-Known Member
What's your point? That water was designed to kill?

Sugar kills people.
Knives kill people.
Cars kill people.

But that is not their sole purpose.

Again, I'm waiting for someone to tell me, "I use my rifle as a broom." or ,"I use my side arm as a paper weight."
[youtube]Is_xrLNS6bY[/youtube]
 

londonfog

Well-Known Member
To be fair, I know 17 year old "kids" who are more "adult" than some 40 year olds! 17 is VERY close to being a "legal adult" though. Just a few months away from that arbitrary number that signifies "adulthood".;-)


Still, it's very unfortunate that a young man is dead (maybe we should just call him a young man since he obviously was not quite an adult but definitely NOT a kid).
17 years old is a kid (child) to me. If you are still in high-school, living with you parents, and paying zero bills you are a kid (child ). I guess you would date a 17 year old and say its cool because she is maturer then some 40 year olds and she is really a young woman.Nope thats a child, but hey I was born in the 50's
 

Illegal Smile

Well-Known Member
What difference does it make how much of a "kid" he was? He tried to kill a man. Any of us would have fought back with any means we had.

I scorn people who say it is a tragedy, and then keep politicizing it. If Martin had been white, none of us would ever have heard about it.
 

londonfog

Well-Known Member
What difference does it make how much of a "kid" he was? He tried to kill a man. Any of us would have fought back with any means we had.

I scorn people who say it is a tragedy, and then keep politicizing it. If Martin had been white, none of us would ever have heard about it.
Wow another idiot coming to make comments. Fuck I'll play along with the retards today.:dunce: and what man did he try to kill and why did he try to kill him ???
 

Illegal Smile

Well-Known Member
Wow another idiot coming to make comments. Fuck I'll play along with the retards today.:dunce: and what man did he try to kill and why did he try to kill him ???
Let me say that I can see you are an intellect to be reckoned with. I can always tell that with the use of "idiot" and "retard." Name calling is the effort of a feeble mind trying to express itself forcefully.

Martin tried to kill Zimmerman. The burden of proof is on the prosecution to PROVE that is not the case. Why he tried to kill him is completely irrelevant. One has the right to self-defense without needing to first delve into the mind of the attacker.
 

ginjawarrior

Well-Known Member
Let me say that I can see you are an intellect to be reckoned with. I can always tell that with the use of "idiot" and "retard." Name calling is the effort of a feeble mind trying to express itself forcefully.

Martin tried to kill Zimmerman. The burden of proof is on the prosecution to PROVE that is not the case. Why he tried to kill him is completely irrelevant. One has the right to self-defense without needing to first delve into the mind of the attacker.
lol proof of zimmermans near death?? remember the ambulance called for zimmerman was canceled didnt even need to attend...
 

Illegal Smile

Well-Known Member
lol proof of zimmermans near death?? remember the ambulance called for zimmerman was canceled didnt even need to attend...
Not relevant. Haven't you read any of the law on this? Self-defense doesn't require ANY injury. Of course, in this case there was substantial injury, combined with Martin actually saying he was going to kill him.
 

londonfog

Well-Known Member
Let me say that I can see you are an intellect to be reckoned with. I can always tell that with the use of "idiot" and "retard." Name calling is the effort of a feeble mind trying to express itself forcefully.

Martin tried to kill Zimmerman. The burden of proof is on the prosecution to PROVE that is not the case. Why he tried to kill him is completely irrelevant. One has the right to self-defense without needing to first delve into the mind of the attacker.
I called you an idiot because you are one. I'm pretty much done with trying to have a decent conversation with the likes of you. You just prepare yourself for four more beautiful years of President Barrack Obama... Fuck um Lets Do This
 

NoDrama

Well-Known Member
17 years old is a kid (child) to me. If you are still in high-school, living with you parents, and paying zero bills you are a kid (child ). I guess you would date a 17 year old and say its cool because she is maturer then some 40 year olds and she is really a young woman.Nope thats a child, but hey I was born in the 50's
So the difference between a child and a man is where you live, how much you pay in bills and whether or not still attending HS?
 

ginjawarrior

Well-Known Member
zimmerman would have dead eh? with what evidence are you basing this on?
was it that even tho he had minor cuts to his head the didnt appear to be any lumping that i personally would expect if his head was being hit that hard.
or was it that the ambulance called for zimmerman got turned round as it wasnt needed?

even if trayvon was the aggressor and zimmerman was in fear of his life it doesnt automatically mean his life is in danger

my oh my that young man martin nearly brutalized that poor zimmerman boy to death. praise da babby jeebus for those concealed carry laws praise jeebus
^i wasnt sure where that last bit came from as i was typing its but i couldnt help but think praise jeebus for concealed hallelujah!!
Not relevant. Haven't you read any of the law on this? Self-defense doesn't require ANY injury. Of course, in this case there was substantial injury, combined with Martin actually saying he was going to kill him.
i made the text bigger cause you seemed to miss it last time...

got a link for the "Martin actually saying he was going to kill him." i did a quick google yet it seems to be a statment from zimmermans dad
 

NoDrama

Well-Known Member
lol proof of zimmermans near death?? remember the ambulance called for zimmerman was canceled didnt even need to attend...
Zimm was treated on site by paramedics from the FIRST ambulance. They called the coroner for Martin. The SECOND ambulance was canceled.
 

NoDrama

Well-Known Member
i made the text bigger cause you seemed to miss it last time...

got a link for the "Martin actually saying he was going to kill him." i did a quick google yet it seems to be a statment from zimmermans dad
SYG law does not make a distinction between fear for ones life and actual danger. The only thing one needs in order to invoke the protection of the SYG law is "Fear". Case closed.
 

NoDrama

Well-Known Member
you are not a man if you are 17, in highschool, living with your folks, and not paying bills..
So if that 17 year old went and raped a 15 year old girl, then stabbed her to death you would chalk that up as a crime committed by a child and then send that toddler off to a juvenile facility until the 18th birthday where he magically becomes a man? Wow, things sure work differently in your little make believe world. Does Trolly still do the rounds there?
 

londonfog

Well-Known Member
SYG law does not make a distinction between fear for ones life and actual danger. The only thing one needs in order to invoke the protection of the SYG law is "Fear". Case closed.
Yup Trayvon was SYG to a creepy, perverted bald guy that kept following him around. To bad the creepy guy also had a gun..Case opened with the creepy guy facing charges.
 

Harrekin

Well-Known Member
SYG law does not make a distinction between fear for ones life and actual danger. The only thing one needs in order to invoke the protection of the SYG law is "Fear". Case closed.
+1

As much as its sick, "stranger danger" is technically a reason to kill someone under SYG.

"He was lunging at me", "He was walking in my path directly towards me", etc are all perfectly valid under SYG.

What other states have their SYG legislation so open ended? I'll put them on my list of "Fuck that Shit" places to visit, with the likes of Burma, N Korea, Afghanistan, etc.
 

londonfog

Well-Known Member
So if that 17 year old went and raped a 15 year old girl, then stabbed her to death you would chalk that up as a crime committed by a child and then send that toddler off to a juvenile facility until the 18th birthday where he magically becomes a man? Wow, things sure work differently in your little make believe world. Does Trolly still do the rounds there?
um thats out of your mouth..not mine...I would lock that crazy azz child up until he became 21 in juvenile then transport him to adult prison..ask me what I would do before you ASSume. What now Taryvon was raping and stabbing girls now...geezzzz you people
 
Top