cannabineer
Ursus marijanus
I've been trying to understand the philosophy so I've done a very small bit of reading. This is what I understand at this point, correct me if I'm wrong AC.
They believe it is not inherent in nature for one to dominate another. The only reason we have hierarchies is because we tolerate them. If we were to abolish these, we would co-exist in equality. Man's basic nature of self would be over ruled by his cognitive reasoning for the greater good, once these restrictions of freedom were removed. The argument is we are conditioned into selfishness and hierarchy and it is NOT natural.
I haven't found yet how they explain lead dogs and packs that follow in nature. Admittedly though I haven't read much. I haven't seen comparisons to anything in nature when they talk about man's nature. We are given a lot of credit as a species.
You have both hands on my primary objection. cn