AG Garland appoints special counsel

DIY-HP-LED

Well-Known Member

In his recent post, Donald Trump admits to not one but two crimes. Can indictments be far off?

58,367 views Nov 28, 2022
Donald Trump just posted what prosecutors will undoubtedly view as admissions to not one but two federal felony crimes: theft/unlawful concealment of government documents and obstruction of justice.

Trump expressly admitted that he took the documents - that did not belong to him - "openly and transparently." He also complains that nothing was done to Hillary Clinton when she "deleted" emails "AFTER receiving a subpoena from the U.S. Congress." This constitutes an implicit admission by Trump that he failed to produce the documents he stole when those documents were subpoenaed. These are sharply incriminating statements by Trump that prosecutors will certainly use as evidence at his eventual and inevitable criminal trial.
 

Offmymeds

Well-Known Member

In his recent post, Donald Trump admits to not one but two crimes. Can indictments be far off?

58,367 views Nov 28, 2022
Donald Trump just posted what prosecutors will undoubtedly view as admissions to not one but two federal felony crimes: theft/unlawful concealment of government documents and obstruction of justice.

Trump expressly admitted that he took the documents - that did not belong to him - "openly and transparently." He also complains that nothing was done to Hillary Clinton when she "deleted" emails "AFTER receiving a subpoena from the U.S. Congress." This constitutes an implicit admission by Trump that he failed to produce the documents he stole when those documents were subpoenaed. These are sharply incriminating statements by Trump that prosecutors will certainly use as evidence at his eventual and inevitable criminal trial.
He's paying literally millions for good attorneys but cannot keep his mouth shut to save his own hide and people still believe he would make good presidential decisions. Maybe this is the week when he becomes presidential.
 

CunningCanuk

Well-Known Member

In his recent post, Donald Trump admits to not one but two crimes. Can indictments be far off?

58,367 views Nov 28, 2022
Donald Trump just posted what prosecutors will undoubtedly view as admissions to not one but two federal felony crimes: theft/unlawful concealment of government documents and obstruction of justice.

Trump expressly admitted that he took the documents - that did not belong to him - "openly and transparently." He also complains that nothing was done to Hillary Clinton when she "deleted" emails "AFTER receiving a subpoena from the U.S. Congress." This constitutes an implicit admission by Trump that he failed to produce the documents he stole when those documents were subpoenaed. These are sharply incriminating statements by Trump that prosecutors will certainly use as evidence at his eventual and inevitable criminal trial.
trump needs an attorney like Saul Goodman.

It must be fun being one of trump’s lawyers. Not only do you have to worry about him incriminating himself, there’s a very strong chance you’ll get disbarred and a very slim chance you’ll ever get paid.
 

Roger A. Shrubber

Well-Known Member
trump needs an attorney like Saul Goodman.

It must be fun being one of trump’s lawyers. Not only do you have to worry about him incriminating himself, there’s a very strong chance you’ll get disbarred and a very slim chance you’ll ever get paid.
the ones that aren't quite as stupid as the rest have started demanding payment up front.
 

DIY-HP-LED

Well-Known Member
the ones that aren't quite as stupid as the rest have started demanding payment up front.
Then throwing Donald under the bus, the better the lawyer the less control Donald has over them because they will always demand payment up front. Jack has a reputation that travels before him and so does Donald. While lawyers demand evidence in court, when it comes to getting paid, they take rumors and hearsay seriously! :lol:
 

DIY-HP-LED

Well-Known Member
How much legal and civil shit can one (sub)human being be in? We are gonna find out! :lol: Jesus, Donald won't have a dime even if he was ten times richer than Musk! Broke and in prison is how he will end his days, a loser. Line up for a piece of Donald folks, he tried to steal your county and can be sued for it.


Judge says Trump’s political actions around 2020 election not protected by ‘absolute immunity’

A federal judge in Washington, DC, on Monday said that Donald Trump doesn’t have “absolute immunity,” as the former president claimed he should, in response to a lawsuit in its early stages related to Trump’s actions around the 2020 presidential election.

Civil rights groups have sued Trump for trying to disenfranchise voters. While Trump’s lawyers argue he can’t be held liable in civil lawsuits because of immunity around the presidency, Judge Emmet Sullivan of the DC District Court on Monday disagreed.

Sullivan is simply allowing the NAACP and the Michigan Welfare Rights Organization to rewrite their lawsuit against Trump. The judge hasn’t determined yet whether Trump is actually liable for what they claim.

Sullivan said Trump’s political conduct wouldn’t be part of his official duties, giving him less legal protection.

“If Former President Trump disrupted the certification of the electoral vote count, as Plaintiffs allege here, such actions would not constitute executive action in defense of the Constitution. For these reasons, the Court concludes that Former President Trump is not immune from monetary damages in this suit,” Sullivan wrote.

Still, Sullivan had harsh words about Trump’s response to the 2020 and 2022 elections. That combative response, Sullivan wrote, could show that Trump could still “pose a very substantial risk in the future to Plaintiffs’ fundamental right to vote.”

“President Trump continues to spread false claims about the 2022 elections and continues to attempt to pressure officials into nullifying the election results: Plaintiffs extensively allege the efforts of Former President Trump and his allies as recently as March 2022 to get state officials to overturn the election results; to endorse and provide financial support to candidates for office who supported his false claims of election fraud; all while fundraising for the 2024 Presidential Election. These allegations are perhaps the opposite of what the Trump Defendants term ‘vague suggestions of fear or intimidation,’” the judge wrote.

Others in addition to the civil rights groups have sued Trump related to January 6.

A separate but similar set of cases is currently before the federal appeals court in Washington, DC, where Trump is arguing he has absolute immunity from actions he took while serving as president. The arguments in that case are scheduled for next week.
 

Roger A. Shrubber

Well-Known Member
How much legal and civil shit can one (sub)human being be in? We are gonna find out! :lol: Jesus, Donald won't have a dime even if he was ten times richer than Musk! Broke and in prison is how he will end his days, a loser. Line up for a piece of Donald folks, he tried to steal your county and can be sued for it.


Judge says Trump’s political actions around 2020 election not protected by ‘absolute immunity’

A federal judge in Washington, DC, on Monday said that Donald Trump doesn’t have “absolute immunity,” as the former president claimed he should, in response to a lawsuit in its early stages related to Trump’s actions around the 2020 presidential election.

Civil rights groups have sued Trump for trying to disenfranchise voters. While Trump’s lawyers argue he can’t be held liable in civil lawsuits because of immunity around the presidency, Judge Emmet Sullivan of the DC District Court on Monday disagreed.

Sullivan is simply allowing the NAACP and the Michigan Welfare Rights Organization to rewrite their lawsuit against Trump. The judge hasn’t determined yet whether Trump is actually liable for what they claim.

Sullivan said Trump’s political conduct wouldn’t be part of his official duties, giving him less legal protection.

“If Former President Trump disrupted the certification of the electoral vote count, as Plaintiffs allege here, such actions would not constitute executive action in defense of the Constitution. For these reasons, the Court concludes that Former President Trump is not immune from monetary damages in this suit,” Sullivan wrote.

Still, Sullivan had harsh words about Trump’s response to the 2020 and 2022 elections. That combative response, Sullivan wrote, could show that Trump could still “pose a very substantial risk in the future to Plaintiffs’ fundamental right to vote.”

“President Trump continues to spread false claims about the 2022 elections and continues to attempt to pressure officials into nullifying the election results: Plaintiffs extensively allege the efforts of Former President Trump and his allies as recently as March 2022 to get state officials to overturn the election results; to endorse and provide financial support to candidates for office who supported his false claims of election fraud; all while fundraising for the 2024 Presidential Election. These allegations are perhaps the opposite of what the Trump Defendants term ‘vague suggestions of fear or intimidation,’” the judge wrote.

Others in addition to the civil rights groups have sued Trump related to January 6.

A separate but similar set of cases is currently before the federal appeals court in Washington, DC, where Trump is arguing he has absolute immunity from actions he took while serving as president. The arguments in that case are scheduled for next week.
bleed him so dry he can't afford an ad on the back of a matchbook. i hope he loses every one of those suits, and has to liquidate everything he owns to pay it off, except the most remote, small, ugly piece of shit house he owns, and that's where they put him under house arrest until he dies.
 

DIY-HP-LED

Well-Known Member
I hope they nail this asshole for something and give him a big Hispanic cellmate with gang tattoos and a bad attitude.


Special Counsel Jack Smith GETS TESTIMONY from Former Top Trump Aide Stephen Miller

28,827 views Nov 30, 2022
Stephen Miller testified before the federal criminal grand jury in Washington DC investigating crimes related to the January 6 insurrection. Miller is the first witness to testify before this grand jury since Jack Smith was appointed Special Counsel. MeidasTouch host Ben Meiselas reports on the significance of this news.
 

DIY-HP-LED

Well-Known Member

Will Oath Keepers convictions ultimately take down Roger Stone, Alex Jones, Mike Flynn and others?

7,740 views Nov 30, 2022
Now that a jury has convicted five members of the Oath Keepers organization, there may be a ripple effect. A second group of Oath Keepers is pending trial in a seditious conspiracy case, as is a batch of Proud Boys. In the wake of the recent seditious conspiracy guilty verdicts, those defendants pending trial undoubtedly are considering whether they should cut their losses, plead guilty, and cooperate with federal prosecutors.

If Oath Keepers and Proud Boys start cooperating, this spells real trouble for Trump loyalists Roger Stone, Alex Jones and Mike Flynn, given that those three men were close with members of the Oath Keepers and the Proud Boys.
 

DIY-HP-LED

Well-Known Member
Biden wants Donald put away and so does Mitch, along with most of the GOP establishment and the democrats want Donald's ass too. Jack will put Donald away.


Jan. 6 Committee To Release Transcripts, Final Report Before Christmas

6,694 views Dec 1, 2022
The House Jan. 6 committee will release transcripts of interviews investigators conducted in their investigation into the attack on the U.S. Capitol, the panel's chairman, Bennie Thompson, said Wednesday. The Washington Post's Bob Woodward joins Morning Joe to discuss.
 
Last edited:

DIY-HP-LED

Well-Known Member

BREAKING: Appeals Court STRIKES DOWN Judge Aileen Cannon Jurisdiction in Trump Stolen Document Case

17,015 views Dec 1, 2022
The Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals has ruled against Judge Aileen Cannon Ordering that she should never have asserted equitable jurisdiction for Donald Trump in the stolen document case. This is a big loss for Trump and a humiliating outcome for the now disgraced corrupt Judge Cannon.
 

cannabineer

Ursus marijanus

BREAKING: Appeals Court STRIKES DOWN Judge Aileen Cannon Jurisdiction in Trump Stolen Document Case

17,015 views Dec 1, 2022
The Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals has ruled against Judge Aileen Cannon Ordering that she should never have asserted equitable jurisdiction for Donald Trump in the stolen document case. This is a big loss for Trump and a humiliating outcome for the now disgraced corrupt Judge Cannon.
not to put too fine a point on it, but that man lost his appeal a long time ago.
 
Top