Sorry but that was bugging me.
Our flag bows to noone shithead, and we bow to no flag.
The way I see it.....When the US used nuclear it saved many american lives.......Now in russia and japan, they both had nuclear power plants that could of killed way more people than the US ever has....I haven't looked up the amount of deaths....but the US could be behind those countries in the amount of people that have been killed by nuclear.....I really don't know which is worse....the bomb or the power plants...............................nitro...
They were going to. WW2 was a race of who will nuke who.
Well, someone has to come in and clear up the mess. Who is that? Ireland? Who saved your family from having to speak German? You don't know a lot about the history of why the rest of the world stepped back from this job, do you? In the 21stt Century??? These last 12 years of your shortsight? Was Ireland attacked in the 21st. Does Ireland maintain world peace?
Immediate casualties, yes. But delayed casualties from radiation eventually doubled the death toll of the two bombs. cn
You need to develop a scenario. How would Japan have made the nukes? Delivered them? What damage pattern would have what effect on the war in the Pacific? When I try, I run into a solid "cannot have happened".
Harrekin, Trolling, Doer and whom ever else the cap fits.
Hard to say but you could ask the Chinese in Nanking, or the Koreans who were occupied by the Japanese prior to WWII. Your question also implies that the allies lost the war, so what would have happened to the British Isles under Germany?
If my aunt had balls I'm pretty sure she would be my uncle.
So you're saying if America never got involved, Britian wouldn't have lost and Hitler still wouldn't have won? Is that why they were begging us for help?
Thanks for the derp, it is actually a better description of what you're trying to say than the way you interpreted my argument.
