Any baseball fans?

Corso312

Well-Known Member
I hate this new rule, a pitcher has to pitch to three hitters, millennials don't like baseball, changing rules won't change that, it's just going to piss off the fans like me who watch already.
 

Couch_Lock

Well-Known Member
NL needs to go DH....AL has had it a long time, its inevitable....Prefer the game with no DH, theres more strategy involved then but the AL won't remove it. For the sake of statistics both leagues should be under the same set of rules.
 

Amaximus

Well-Known Member
No, It's time to remove the DH altogether, not add another talentless, aging slugger position...

Furthermore... the 3 pitch rule? I'm ok with that. I once watched the Yankees change the pitcher 5 times over TWO batters, 7 pitches thrown total. it took 27 minutes. PASS.
 

Sunbiz1

Well-Known Member
I'm hoping we trade Bryant to Atlanta for a decent haul of prospects. Move Quintana too. Reload that farm.
Not much choice there, as Theo and Co. cannot draft pitching.
And then there's Lester, highest paid player on the team; whose stats are falling by the year.

I'm happy with Cubs ownership, but the GM needs lessons from Tampa; who with less than a $50M payroll seem to compete every year.
How do they do it?, this is according to a Rays fan I asked recently:
"Tampa Bay and Houston have pioneered in this field, reducing the number of scouts that they have from around 40 to around 20. Rather than beat the bushes searching for talent, now talent is identified by data which didn't used to be available. Once the data team identifies a potential prospect, then the scouts are sent out to see what the guy is like. The idea is to eliminate wasted time chasing guys who looked good in one or two games which a scout watched, and zero in on the guys whom the data suggests might have a future."
 

Flash63

Well-Known Member
What do you guys think of a electronic strike zone?sick of umpires and their ever changing strike zones, smaller for veterans,bigger for rookies..depending on their moods..
 

Couch_Lock

Well-Known Member
What do you guys think of a electronic strike zone?sick of umpires and their ever changing strike zones, smaller for veterans,bigger for rookies..depending on their moods..
Robot for home umpire I like, or a computerized consistent strike zone. Too many umpires feel "shown up" by batters shaking their heads or arguing balls and strikes. And after that happens? They are human, some react badly and continue to get balls and strikes wrong, on purpose.
 

Corso312

Well-Known Member
Not much choice there, as Theo and Co. cannot draft pitching.
And then there's Lester, highest paid player on the team; whose stats are falling by the year.

I'm happy with Cubs ownership, but the GM needs lessons from Tampa; who with less than a $50M payroll seem to compete every year.
How do they do it?, this is according to a Rays fan I asked recently:
"Tampa Bay and Houston have pioneered in this field, reducing the number of scouts that they have from around 40 to around 20. Rather than beat the bushes searching for talent, now talent is identified by data which didn't used to be available. Once the data team identifies a potential prospect, then the scouts are sent out to see what the guy is like. The idea is to eliminate wasted time chasing guys who looked good in one or two games which a scout watched, and zero in on the guys whom the data suggests might have a future."

Nobody would be panicking about our farm system if we didn't make that awful trade for Quintana, if Cease and Jimenez were here it's all good. I hated the trade at the time..even worse than I imagined.

We have slot of young arms in the system, we'll find out next year if they are worth a fuck.
 

Couch_Lock

Well-Known Member
Nobody would be panicking about our farm system if we didn't make that awful trade for Quintana, if Cease and Jimenez were here it's all good. I hated the trade at the time..even worse than I imagined.

We have slot of young arms in the system, we'll find out next year if they are worth a fuck.
Cubs develop great position players, but for some reason never a pitcher. They need to fire the pitching scouts they have and hire new ones, imo.
 

New Age United

Well-Known Member
3 batter minimum for all pitchers. No more pitchers brought in the game to face just one or two hitters.
Crazy, supposed to speed up the game but takes the strategy outta the game, I guess that will be a new strength or weakness for pitchers might actually make for some interesting ball, lot of walks.
 

Hugepeckerhead

New Member
No, It's time to remove the DH altogether, not add another talentless, aging slugger position...

Furthermore... the 3 pitch rule? I'm ok with that. I once watched the Yankees change the pitcher 5 times over TWO batters, 7 pitches thrown total. it took 27 minutes. PASS.
I agree. AL needs to lose the DH. These leagues are trying to make it better but dont realize they are ruining the game. Like football....they want to keep concussions low but dont realize players hitting as low as they are....are causing more injuries. They might not be life threatening, however they can be career enders.
 

doublejj

Well-Known Member
Some of those Astro players should be suspended for a year w/ no pay. Players will think TWICE about cheating, then.
MLB already said they will be monitoring the situation & if a pitcher retaliates and hits an Astro player they will face fines and suspension......which is more than any Astro player received for cheating....smh
 

Sunbiz1

Well-Known Member
Nobody would be panicking about our farm system if we didn't make that awful trade for Quintana, if Cease and Jimenez were here it's all good. I hated the trade at the time..even worse than I imagined.

We have slot of young arms in the system, we'll find out next year if they are worth a fuck.

While Heyward wasn't an awful trade, he hasn't produced enough to be highest paid.
Contreras has been a much better asset, and due for a HUGE raise.
And then there's Kimbrel...we'll see.:confused:
 
Top