Can you answer 3 basic science questions correctly?

racerboy71

bud bootlegger

• Jan 17, 2010

• #21

i wonder why is only 21% of the us population has gotten all three right, then why has about 90% of riu's members? is this to say that potheads are smarter than the average bear? i think so...
too easy.....

 

robert 14617

Well-Known Member

• Jan 17, 2010

• #22

I suggest you read Earths Forbidden Secrets, its available free online in PDF format.[/QUOTE]
thanks for the ref ..i'd give rep but have to spread some around first catch you later ANC....rob

 

Woodstock.Hippie

New Member

• Jan 20, 2010

• #23

IT's because we're mostly not Jesus campers.

The climate is changing, my friends.

Shut Up And Vote

 

Ronjohn7779

Well-Known Member

• Jan 20, 2010

• #24

no, 78% (%'s change depending on your source; anywhere from 1-3% of that is drinkable), It takes 365 days for one revolution around the sun...(actually it's a little longer)

 

P

PadawanBater

Guest

• Jan 20, 2010

• #25

Ronjohn7779 said:

no, 78% (%'s change depending on your source; anywhere from 1-3% of that is drinkable), It takes 365 days for one revolution around the sun...(actually it's a little longer)

Click to expand...

If you want to get that technical, the 21% number would surely decrease, especially in America.

 

Ronjohn7779

Well-Known Member

• Jan 20, 2010

• #26

PadawanBater said:

If you want to get that technical, the 21% number would surely decrease, especially in America.

Click to expand...

You posted that article you should know it was done on American adults...

 

P

PadawanBater

Guest

• Jan 21, 2010

• #27

Ronjohn7779 said:

You posted that article you should know it was done on American adults...

Click to expand...

Yeah, but how many of us know it's actually closer to 78%, and that it takes 365.24 days to go around the Sun... most of us don't consider it, we just go with nice round numbers. I was just sayin' that if you wanted to get technical, no way it would be 21%, I'd guess it might make it to 5%, but even that's iffy...