Club 600
- Thread starter DST
- Start date
Guzias1
Well-Known Member
what do you mean maybe, put her in the mood, make it happen! fuck. i want me a lady right now..
get some for us jhod :]
Don Gin and Ton
Well-Known Member
Whats shaking D? more cake? 
the snow finally hit the toon. usually the toon gets hammered and the rest of the country don't this time we got nadda for a week while the rest got pasted.
off swimming and for a turkish before work warm as toast in there haha
Eff work in it's A hole
[video=youtube_share;6Lh7Zg8WXwU]http://youtu.be/6Lh7Zg8WXwU[/video]
might musically be no ones taste, tbh it aint mine i watch the vid with my ipod on in the gym. watch silent if necessary lol.
Lmao 3:05 blowback anyone hahahaha
the snow finally hit the toon. usually the toon gets hammered and the rest of the country don't this time we got nadda for a week while the rest got pasted.off swimming and for a turkish before work warm as toast in there haha
Eff work in it's A hole
[video=youtube_share;6Lh7Zg8WXwU]http://youtu.be/6Lh7Zg8WXwU[/video]
might musically be no ones taste, tbh it aint mine i watch the vid with my ipod on in the gym. watch silent if necessary lol.
Lmao 3:05 blowback anyone hahahaha
I've popped some serax and its time to lala land for me.
Don Gin and Ton
Well-Known Member
Enjoy Chaka, what's a sarax? Like a xanax?
dababydroman
Well-Known Member
chops my winter grow m1 spring arvest or whatever looks pretty good for the conditions it grew through,, to bad neither of m comps will up load the pic.. it just sits there loading... bullshit..
dababydroman
Well-Known Member
dude I need some painkillers foreal..I rather grow my own opiates though.. just not sure how to go about it..
dababydroman
Well-Known Member
not need that's sounds a lil pheinish I just love that high I cant lie.. I and I do have troubles sleeping I kno that would help just grow a few poppies its probably better than takin an advil if you have a head ache.. but me I love to just nod out once n a while.
dababydroman
Well-Known Member
lol my bad yall im a bit deunk I cant even explain my point properly
dababydroman
Well-Known Member
I just tryied to drink my weed jar... hah
AMCHEESIER
Active Member
whats up 600 hope everyone well, some great porn still gracing the pages. im hoping to get flowering again soon and hopefully setting up another indoor grow so ill be posting again soon.
Don Gin and Ton
Well-Known Member
holy shit hahaha you don't need access to a garden full of opiates droman. i've grown the poppy before, it's a doddle extracting the good stuff is a little tricky till you know how. the afghans can score a poppy head without killing it and take like 3 or 4 x the yield.
DoobieBrother
Well-Known Member
Don Gin and Ton
Well-Known Member
gaffer pulled a blinder today. I'd just gotten into the office and the fire alarm went off. me being the fire officer ( I know lol ) I ordered everyone out. then I smelled the burnt toast smell n thought ah don't bother lads i said someone down the halls just burnt some toast. turns out it was the gaffer in the other room. he'd mixed the dial numbers up on the toaster and set it away on just next to maximum setting. black poptart, plumes of smoke. 60 odd folks stood out in the snow in the car park. fire brigade the lot. it's a council run building so the place is hard lined to the fire service. can't just knock the alarm off. if it happens again £500 fine.
man's a disaster on 2 legs. a hilarious one at that.
man's a disaster on 2 legs. a hilarious one at that.
curious old fart
Well-Known Member
By JESSE J. HOLLAND
Associated Press WASHINGTON (AP) - The Supreme Court ruled Tuesday that police cannot bring drug-sniffing police dogs onto a suspect's property to look for evidence without first getting a warrant for a search, a decision which may limit how investigators use dogs' sensitive noses to search out drugs, explosives and other items hidden from human sight, sound and smell.
The high court split 5-4 on the decision to uphold the Florida Supreme Court's ruling throwing out evidence seized in the search of Joelis Jardines' Miami-area house. That search was based on an alert by Franky the drug dog from outside the closed front door.
Justice Antonin Scalia said a person has the Fourth Amendment right to be free from the government's gaze inside their home and in the area surrounding it, which is called the curtilage.
"The police cannot, without a warrant based on probable cause, hang around on the lawn or in the side garden, trawling for evidence and perhaps peering into the windows of the home," Justice Antonin Scalia said for the majority. "And the officers here had all four of their feet and all four of their companion's, planted firmly on that curtilage - the front porch is the classic example of an area intimately associated with the life of the home."
He was joined in his opinion by Justices Clarence Thomas, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan.
On the morning of Dec. 5, 2006, Miami-Dade police detectives and U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration agents set up surveillance outside a house south of the city after getting an anonymous tip that it might contain a marijuana growing operation. Detective Douglas Bartelt arrived with Franky and the two went up to the house, where Franky quickly detected the odor of pot at the base of the front door and sat down as he was trained to do.
That sniff was used to get a search warrant from a judge. The house was searched and its lone occupant, Jardines, was arrested trying to escape out the back door. Officers pulled 179 live marijuana plants from the house, with an estimated street value of more than $700,000.
Jardines was charged with marijuana trafficking and grand theft for stealing electricity needed to run the highly sophisticated operation. He pleaded not guilty and his attorney challenged the search, claiming Franky's sniff outside the front door was an unconstitutional law enforcement intrusion into the home.
The trial judge agreed and threw out the evidence seized in the search, but that was reversed by an intermediate appeals court. In April a divided Florida Supreme Court sided with the original judge.
The Supreme Court's decision upholds that ruling.
"A drug detection dog is a specialized device for discovering objects not in plain view (or plain smell)," Kagan wrote in a concurring opinion. "That device here was aimed at a home - the most private and inviolate (or so we expect) of all the places and things the Fourth Amendment protects. Was this activity a trespass? Yes, as the court holds today. Was it also an invasion of privacy? Yes, that as well."
The four justices who dissented were Chief Justice John Roberts, Justice Stephen Breyer, Justice Anthony Kennedy and Justice Samuel Alito.
It's not trespassing when a mail carrier comes on a porch for a brief period, Alito said. And that includes "police officers who wish to gather evidence against an occupant," Alito said. "According to the court, however, the police officer in this case, Detective Bartelt, committed a trespass because he was accompanied during his otherwise lawful visit to the front door of the respondent's house by his dog, Franky. Where is the authority evidencing such a rule?"
Alito also said that the court's ruling stretches expectations of privacy too far.
"A reasonable person understands that odors emanating from a house may be detected from locations that are open to the public, and a reasonable person will not count on the strength of those odors remaining within the range that, while detectable by a dog, cannot be smelled by a human."
___
The case was Florida v. Jardines, 11-564.
cof
Associated Press WASHINGTON (AP) - The Supreme Court ruled Tuesday that police cannot bring drug-sniffing police dogs onto a suspect's property to look for evidence without first getting a warrant for a search, a decision which may limit how investigators use dogs' sensitive noses to search out drugs, explosives and other items hidden from human sight, sound and smell.
The high court split 5-4 on the decision to uphold the Florida Supreme Court's ruling throwing out evidence seized in the search of Joelis Jardines' Miami-area house. That search was based on an alert by Franky the drug dog from outside the closed front door.
Justice Antonin Scalia said a person has the Fourth Amendment right to be free from the government's gaze inside their home and in the area surrounding it, which is called the curtilage.
"The police cannot, without a warrant based on probable cause, hang around on the lawn or in the side garden, trawling for evidence and perhaps peering into the windows of the home," Justice Antonin Scalia said for the majority. "And the officers here had all four of their feet and all four of their companion's, planted firmly on that curtilage - the front porch is the classic example of an area intimately associated with the life of the home."
He was joined in his opinion by Justices Clarence Thomas, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan.
On the morning of Dec. 5, 2006, Miami-Dade police detectives and U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration agents set up surveillance outside a house south of the city after getting an anonymous tip that it might contain a marijuana growing operation. Detective Douglas Bartelt arrived with Franky and the two went up to the house, where Franky quickly detected the odor of pot at the base of the front door and sat down as he was trained to do.
That sniff was used to get a search warrant from a judge. The house was searched and its lone occupant, Jardines, was arrested trying to escape out the back door. Officers pulled 179 live marijuana plants from the house, with an estimated street value of more than $700,000.
Jardines was charged with marijuana trafficking and grand theft for stealing electricity needed to run the highly sophisticated operation. He pleaded not guilty and his attorney challenged the search, claiming Franky's sniff outside the front door was an unconstitutional law enforcement intrusion into the home.
The trial judge agreed and threw out the evidence seized in the search, but that was reversed by an intermediate appeals court. In April a divided Florida Supreme Court sided with the original judge.
The Supreme Court's decision upholds that ruling.
"A drug detection dog is a specialized device for discovering objects not in plain view (or plain smell)," Kagan wrote in a concurring opinion. "That device here was aimed at a home - the most private and inviolate (or so we expect) of all the places and things the Fourth Amendment protects. Was this activity a trespass? Yes, as the court holds today. Was it also an invasion of privacy? Yes, that as well."
The four justices who dissented were Chief Justice John Roberts, Justice Stephen Breyer, Justice Anthony Kennedy and Justice Samuel Alito.
It's not trespassing when a mail carrier comes on a porch for a brief period, Alito said. And that includes "police officers who wish to gather evidence against an occupant," Alito said. "According to the court, however, the police officer in this case, Detective Bartelt, committed a trespass because he was accompanied during his otherwise lawful visit to the front door of the respondent's house by his dog, Franky. Where is the authority evidencing such a rule?"
Alito also said that the court's ruling stretches expectations of privacy too far.
"A reasonable person understands that odors emanating from a house may be detected from locations that are open to the public, and a reasonable person will not count on the strength of those odors remaining within the range that, while detectable by a dog, cannot be smelled by a human."
___
The case was Florida v. Jardines, 11-564.
cof
curious old fart
Well-Known Member
For those that don't catch up on the news
Associated Press TACOMA, Wash. (AP) - John Connelly leaned forward on his barstool, set his lips against a clear glass pipe and inhaled a white cloud of marijuana vapor.
A handful of people milled around him. Three young women stood behind the bar, ready to assist with the preparation of the bongs, as the strains of a blues band playing downstairs sounded faintly off the exposed brick walls.
"It feels so comfortable in here," said Connelly, 33. "It's just a great social aspect."
Welcome to the Stonegate - puns welcome. It's one of a tiny number of bars, cafes and private clubs catering to the stoner class in Washington and Colorado since voters last fall made them the first states to legalize marijuana for adults over 21.
Both states bar the public use of marijuana - which typically would include bars and restaurants - and most bars are steering clear of allowing pot use at least until officials come up with rules for the new weed industry.
But a few have been testing the boundaries of what's allowed in hopes of drumming up business and making a political statement.
"I've been running a bar a few years now, and people would always go outside around the corner, into the shadows, to smoke up," said Jeff Call, the Stonegate's owner. "People shouldn't have to hide. There's no rules yet, but I'm trying to do this thoughtfully and responsibly."
Washington's law bans pot distribution by anyone but a licensed seller - and no such licenses will be issued until the end of the year at the earliest. There's also a statewide smoking ban that prohibits smoking where people work.
So the establishments are trying various strategies to allow on-site consumption.
Frankie's Sports Bar and Grill in Olympia is less than a mile from the headquarters of the Washington State Liquor Control Board, where officials are writing rules for the pot industry. It allows members of its private smoking room to use tobacco or marijuana.
The owner, Frankie Schnarr, said his revenue has jumped by nearly half since he started allowing pot smoking in December.
In Denver, Club 64 - named after Colorado's law, Amendment 64 - charges a $30 yearly membership for the privilege of getting high in a private social setting. Members receive emails alerting them to the locations of club "meetings," like a recent St. Patrick's Day party hosted by a local bar, featuring marijuana-infused green beer.
Club 64 owner Robert Corry, an attorney, wants to open a bar where he can welcome members on a daily basis.
"A marijuana club is exactly what the voters wanted," Corry said. "Colorado voters knew exactly what we were doing."
The Front Tea & Art Shop in Lafayette, about 20 miles north of Denver, offered "cannabis-friendly" evenings six nights a week at which customers over 21 were allowed to bring their own pot.
Owner Veronica Carpio said the cafe attracted 25 people a day - until last month, when Lafayette declared a moratorium on pot use at businesses. She's suing, arguing the city overstepped its authority.
Anyone who wanders up the stairs to the Stonegate's second-floor smoking lounge is charged a nominal fee - $1 a day to $20 a year - to become a member of the private club. To evade the smoking ban, there's no smoking allowed - only "vaporizing," a method that involves heating the marijuana without burning it.
Call provides space in the lounge - an L-shaped bar of blond wood, painted with portraits of Keith Richards, Stevie Ray Vaughn and other rock heroes - to the proprietor of a local medical marijuana dispensary.
People who don't have a medical authorization have to bring their own pot, then rent a vaporizer - $10 by the half-hour - or pay to have one prepared for them. For $5, those who do have an authorization are offered various preparations of "shatter" - a hardened oil of powerful marijuana extract.
Call opened his rum-and-pizza joint a few years ago in a brick building along a formerly seedy stretch of shops, bars and restaurants. The second floor had recently been operated as a brothel, he said.
On a recent Friday night, a gentle scent of fresh marijuana filled the room. At one table, a handful of 20-somethings inhaled deeply from a rubber hose attached to a rented vaporizer, a black box that toasted the cannabis to 375 degrees.
Those who wanted a more powerful dose grabbed a seat at the bar, where Jenae DeCampo, a 21-year-old in a black tube-top, pulled out a small blowtorch.
DeCampo held the hissing flame to the metal stem of a clear glass bong until the metal glowed orange. With a wand, she picked up a small piece of what looked like amber - a chunk of potent, hardened marijuana oil - and rubbed it on the scorching metal.
A white cloud filled the pipe, bubbled through the water at the bottom and rushed into Connelly's lungs.
"A lot of people are shocked by what we're doing because it's so uncommon," DeCampo said. "I like being part of something that could possibly be big."
Tacoma's code enforcement staff is reviewing the Stonegate's operation, a city spokeswoman said.
Justin Nordhorn, the state liquor board's chief of enforcement, has some concerns about bars that allow pot use. Most importantly, he said, is that marijuana can compound alcohol's intoxicating effects, meaning people might be even more dangerous when driving.
He also doubted whether the "private club" aspect of the establishments would keep them out of trouble. A truly private club that serves alcohol - say, an Elks Lodge - would have to have a liquor license specific to private clubs, and members of the public couldn't be allowed in.
For now, Nordhorn noted, there is a loophole in the state board's ability to block bars from allowing pot use. Its rules require bars to address on-site criminal violations, but public use of marijuana is only a civil infraction - meaning officials can't necessarily punish bars that let people partake, even if police could come in and write tickets to toking customers.
That's something the board could address as it makes rules for the new pot industry.
For now, Call's goal is to get more people into the bar - people who will get hungry and order pizzas.
"People are just smiling and friendly and happy," Call said. "I just really like the feeling you get when you're up here."
Something to look forward to.
cof
Associated Press TACOMA, Wash. (AP) - John Connelly leaned forward on his barstool, set his lips against a clear glass pipe and inhaled a white cloud of marijuana vapor.
A handful of people milled around him. Three young women stood behind the bar, ready to assist with the preparation of the bongs, as the strains of a blues band playing downstairs sounded faintly off the exposed brick walls.
"It feels so comfortable in here," said Connelly, 33. "It's just a great social aspect."
Welcome to the Stonegate - puns welcome. It's one of a tiny number of bars, cafes and private clubs catering to the stoner class in Washington and Colorado since voters last fall made them the first states to legalize marijuana for adults over 21.
Both states bar the public use of marijuana - which typically would include bars and restaurants - and most bars are steering clear of allowing pot use at least until officials come up with rules for the new weed industry.
But a few have been testing the boundaries of what's allowed in hopes of drumming up business and making a political statement.
"I've been running a bar a few years now, and people would always go outside around the corner, into the shadows, to smoke up," said Jeff Call, the Stonegate's owner. "People shouldn't have to hide. There's no rules yet, but I'm trying to do this thoughtfully and responsibly."
Washington's law bans pot distribution by anyone but a licensed seller - and no such licenses will be issued until the end of the year at the earliest. There's also a statewide smoking ban that prohibits smoking where people work.
So the establishments are trying various strategies to allow on-site consumption.
Frankie's Sports Bar and Grill in Olympia is less than a mile from the headquarters of the Washington State Liquor Control Board, where officials are writing rules for the pot industry. It allows members of its private smoking room to use tobacco or marijuana.
The owner, Frankie Schnarr, said his revenue has jumped by nearly half since he started allowing pot smoking in December.
In Denver, Club 64 - named after Colorado's law, Amendment 64 - charges a $30 yearly membership for the privilege of getting high in a private social setting. Members receive emails alerting them to the locations of club "meetings," like a recent St. Patrick's Day party hosted by a local bar, featuring marijuana-infused green beer.
Club 64 owner Robert Corry, an attorney, wants to open a bar where he can welcome members on a daily basis.
"A marijuana club is exactly what the voters wanted," Corry said. "Colorado voters knew exactly what we were doing."
The Front Tea & Art Shop in Lafayette, about 20 miles north of Denver, offered "cannabis-friendly" evenings six nights a week at which customers over 21 were allowed to bring their own pot.
Owner Veronica Carpio said the cafe attracted 25 people a day - until last month, when Lafayette declared a moratorium on pot use at businesses. She's suing, arguing the city overstepped its authority.
Anyone who wanders up the stairs to the Stonegate's second-floor smoking lounge is charged a nominal fee - $1 a day to $20 a year - to become a member of the private club. To evade the smoking ban, there's no smoking allowed - only "vaporizing," a method that involves heating the marijuana without burning it.
Call provides space in the lounge - an L-shaped bar of blond wood, painted with portraits of Keith Richards, Stevie Ray Vaughn and other rock heroes - to the proprietor of a local medical marijuana dispensary.
People who don't have a medical authorization have to bring their own pot, then rent a vaporizer - $10 by the half-hour - or pay to have one prepared for them. For $5, those who do have an authorization are offered various preparations of "shatter" - a hardened oil of powerful marijuana extract.
Call opened his rum-and-pizza joint a few years ago in a brick building along a formerly seedy stretch of shops, bars and restaurants. The second floor had recently been operated as a brothel, he said.
On a recent Friday night, a gentle scent of fresh marijuana filled the room. At one table, a handful of 20-somethings inhaled deeply from a rubber hose attached to a rented vaporizer, a black box that toasted the cannabis to 375 degrees.
Those who wanted a more powerful dose grabbed a seat at the bar, where Jenae DeCampo, a 21-year-old in a black tube-top, pulled out a small blowtorch.
DeCampo held the hissing flame to the metal stem of a clear glass bong until the metal glowed orange. With a wand, she picked up a small piece of what looked like amber - a chunk of potent, hardened marijuana oil - and rubbed it on the scorching metal.
A white cloud filled the pipe, bubbled through the water at the bottom and rushed into Connelly's lungs.
"A lot of people are shocked by what we're doing because it's so uncommon," DeCampo said. "I like being part of something that could possibly be big."
Tacoma's code enforcement staff is reviewing the Stonegate's operation, a city spokeswoman said.
Justin Nordhorn, the state liquor board's chief of enforcement, has some concerns about bars that allow pot use. Most importantly, he said, is that marijuana can compound alcohol's intoxicating effects, meaning people might be even more dangerous when driving.
He also doubted whether the "private club" aspect of the establishments would keep them out of trouble. A truly private club that serves alcohol - say, an Elks Lodge - would have to have a liquor license specific to private clubs, and members of the public couldn't be allowed in.
For now, Nordhorn noted, there is a loophole in the state board's ability to block bars from allowing pot use. Its rules require bars to address on-site criminal violations, but public use of marijuana is only a civil infraction - meaning officials can't necessarily punish bars that let people partake, even if police could come in and write tickets to toking customers.
That's something the board could address as it makes rules for the new pot industry.
For now, Call's goal is to get more people into the bar - people who will get hungry and order pizzas.
"People are just smiling and friendly and happy," Call said. "I just really like the feeling you get when you're up here."
Something to look forward to.
cof
bassman999
Well-Known Member
City of Sacramento
On November 20, 2012, the City of Sacramento adopted a compromise personal use medical cannabis cultivation ordinance. It includes: 1) Reasonable square footage allowance for personal cultivation: 400 square feet; 2) Reasonable wattage for artificial light: 3800 watts; 3) Sensible policy for cities on natural sunlight cultivation: alternative structures acceptable if compliant (secure locked door; solid, non-transparent, not-easily-penetrated walls and roofs; and odor-free--all conditions met by a secure greenhouse system); and 4) No special registration or permit required for personal use cultivation; rather, complaint-driven enforcement. CalNORML would like to see a hardship exemption added to any city's ordinance that precludes outdoor cultivation. We do not support blanket outdoor cultivation bans, certainly not in whole counties, or rural areas. Any patient who is impacted by planned or existing local ordinances can write to CalNORML.
Sacramento County
On December 6, 2011, the Sacramento County supervisors passed an ordinance that zones out anything that is federally illegal. Crackdowns on all medical marijuana dispensaries in unincorporated areas of the county followed. How this will impact medical marijuana cultivation in the county remains to be seen. Since representatives of the federal government have repeatedly stated they is not interested in prosecuting patients, only those profiting from medical marijuana, one would hope this sweeping provision would not be used to crackdown on cultivation as well. Without dispensaries or gardens, there can be no safe access, as mandated by state law. There is an effort to repeal the ordinance by referendum, write here.
I live in the county, and Norml told me that the city laws are in effect there as well.
I am not 100% sure, but looks like we need a lot more than a "green house" to meet these guidelines unfortunately.
curious old fart
Well-Known Member
3) Sensible policy for cities on natural sunlight cultivation: alternative structures acceptable if compliant (secure locked door; solid, non-transparent, not-easily-penetrated walls and roofs; and odor-free--all conditions met by a secure greenhouse system);
How can a greenhouse with natural sunlight be non-transparent?
cof
How can a greenhouse with natural sunlight be non-transparent?
cof
supchaka
Well-Known Member
Yeah it's a "benzo" some say better, some say worse than Xanax. They give me no buzz whatsoever, but they make me normal when I can tell I got a flip out mode coming on. They also are about the only thing that helps me sleep, although they don't make me tired. Does any of that make sense?!
Dababy, I've had a open ended script for norcos for about 3 years now. They don't work for me like they used to, I think they actually cause me anxiety now, although I still take them! Drug addiction is a mother fucker eh. The norc will raise my anxiety level and the serax brings it back in check. It's a vicious cycle! I'm in a phase of trying to NOT take pharms right now. Which is another vicious cycle lol.