whaaat is your obsession with mass death? They are purely your words...mass death. That happens every day.
he means peoples heads..did they explode?
whaaat is your obsession with mass death? They are purely your words...mass death. That happens every day.
i thought this thread was about eh mass deaths and negligence the new obamacare was going to bring . . .i was supposed to sign up . . but i havent been told where it is actually happening yet . . .just curious dont wnat to be left out
"Access" is not the same as "current participation". The penalty for accessing that quite possibly lousy and expensive insurance plan is often intolerably steep, like quarter to half the spouse's pay contribution to the household. How is that equitable?
Here is one Doctors' account of the real life horror of bogus "insurance".
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887324139404579017113415486176.html
Take the examples of Lasik eye surgery or cosmetic surgery. These services are not covered by insurance. Providers compete on the basis of quality, outcomes and price. And prices have continually dropped as quality and services have improved—unlike the rest of health care.
When my patient returned for his post-op visit we discussed the experience. It was clear to both of us that the only way to make health care more affordable is to diminish the role of third-party payers. Let consumers and providers interact through market forces to drive down prices and drive up quality, like we do when we buy groceries, clothing, cars, computers, etc. Drop the focus on prepaid health plans and return to the days of real health insurance—that covers major, unforeseen events, leaving the everyday expenses to the consumer—just like auto and homeowners' insurance.
Sadly, we are heading in the exact opposite direction. ObamaCare expands the role of the third party and practically eliminates the role—and the say—of the patient in the delivery of health care. Will they ever learn?
I'm pointing out that "access" can be a weaselword, implying "has" when "can have at unspecified cost" might be true. There used to be a more equitable contract between employer and employee, back in the day when a job usually meant a career. After the economic part-collapse and part-remodel, folks count themselves lucky to have just a job. You mentioned part-time employment; in my day that was the exception where now it is more and more the rule. Never mind hours, bennies and advancement track. In that climate, I see limiting family participation in the principal's bennies as cynical.
That's no better.
And 16 years? How did you come up with that?
Perhaps an unworthy complaint, but their tenure had a Democrat in between ...
both bushes
That's no better.
And 16 years? How did you come up with that?
it all went down hill after carter
8 Years of Bush
And about 6 years under Clinton?
it all went down hill after carter