calliandra
Well-Known Member
eww yikes that's waaay creepy lolIt was a photographer that dug it for a dark room over 20 years ago. There's one creepy af over exposed photo of 2 kids down there. Luckily enough I'm a skinny enough dude to fit down there too
I'd want to cleanse the place of any bad energies too... just in case!
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6bd69/6bd69112ee9b7a39b71fc1f59d1036c3e5010cb7" alt="Shocked :shock: :shock:"
Aye, the good compost - thermal or worm or leafmold - will be the answer to all our woes, pretty sure of that tooHhahaha......sorry for dropping it in like that, I've read about it on many occasions , but it's like 'Teaming with nutrients', the chemistry(and biology) of it all really baffles me. AND without actually getting a soil test done in a professional lab(fecking expensive here), it's a totally moot subject, I suppose. I admit to being totally out of my depth when it comes to what's going on at those levels and still find it hard not to have a 'feed the plant' mentality, when my soil ain't doing the job for me.
....................hmmmmnnn, just had an idea, how do you fancy sampling some of my soil(I'm sure you offered me a freebie once, Lmfao), see how the life compares to yours? Not sure how the couple of days transport would affect it or how best to package it tho?
You already seem more confident with your identifications, but I suppose taking good samples must be a tricky process and can't imagine how you'd accurately quantify what you're actually looking at.
I think I probably just need to simplify things and concentrate on making some good compost and EWC![]()
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/99041/99041ee992a486128ff60ec0780884cb53291969" alt="Blunt Smoke :blsmoke: :blsmoke:"
I just did a fresh assessment of my last VC and lo, I've got a bacterial to fungal balance of 596:650 µg/g of soil, that is a proportion of a bit over 1 (which to my mind would be ideal).
The PE soil was at 0.2 a few days ago, meaning 0.2 units of fungal biomass per unit of bacteria, so waaaay bacterial despite sprouting fungi, too bacterial even for those who lean more towards bacterial dominance in their preference for our favourite plant (even for them, it should at least then be over 0.5
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f4fbd/f4fbd23c83abab82a8c929bb45422fc153f54fb3" alt="Wink ;) ;)"
So topdressing that VC should push the soil into a more fungal direction, which I'll check on a week after application - and improve the conditions for providing the ammonium needed for later stages. And even when that soil has great diversity of everything in it, to keep checking during the grow to make sure no microbial armageddons happened along the way.
Just to exemplify how we should be thinking when working with full microbial focus. But yes, we are prone to lose that focus, it's like a knee-jerk response somehow LOL I keep doing it myself, and it does help to tide them over too haha
Of course my offer to look at your soil stands!
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3b5c0/3b5c0f3ae790faa3602603e4c63275a2ef20ca19" alt="Cool :cool: :cool:"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/01840/01840baa859ae6fe6be9f8ddb5ed78cb62b1f7ae" alt="Roll Eyes :rolleyes: :rolleyes:"
Oh and a chemical soil test is probably moot for living soil anyway (unless you're checking for toxins maybe). As I currently understand it, when you test for soluble nutrients (i.e. the forms that can be taken up directly by the plant), the results will be deceptively low (because the nutes aren't freeflowing, but tied up in the microbial mass), while when you test for total nutes (which measures all forms of nutrients), the values are going to be so ridiculously over the top they'll say you have all sorts of toxicities in there? lol
Cheers!
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/546ab/546abaa5094602b2c44366719bd6820650ff0c81" alt="Big Joint :bigjoint: :bigjoint:"