fenderburn84
Well-Known Member
I get the banks, but how do these other groups get that much clout? That's the part I can never wrap my mind around.
Do they shut down dispensaries to help the cartels?
- Thread starter fenderburn84
- Start date
fenderburn84
Well-Known Member
I work at a ethanol plant. I'm in the new batch research lab. Usually pretty lame but when it pick up it picks up quick.
Dan Kone
Well-Known Member
I doubt that's the case. I believe the CIA makes money off the drug trade, but I believe it's mostly from the Asian/south american/central american drug trade. The Mexican cartels hit too close to home. It's gotten to the point where they may entirely take over the Mexican government if they haven't already. They pose a serious national security threat at this point.
I think it's extremely unlikely there is much or any collusion on a grand scale between mexican cartels and our government. Not on this level at least. I believe any relationship our government has with cartels is looking the other way in exchange for snitching/intel. I don't think they are dictating law.
Dan Kone
Well-Known Member
Corn ethanol?
deprave
New Member
Well every U.S president has attended meetings and many top U.S poloticians are/were members, UK, nederlands, canada, etc....The owners of the banks are also part of it and its all linked up with the british royal crown...and they can be quoted saying really freakishly sick things, they talk about things like world depopulation.
fenderburn84
Well-Known Member
Yep. We have a few new batches coming through, but I can't say anymore about it. Confidentiality clause and all.
fenderburn84
Well-Known Member
What should I type into Google to hear more about the link to the throne?
deprave
New Member
Read about Rothchilds and Rockafellers, More specifcally Rothchilds, even their own words and books and that will be great start. You really want to look at the history of banking and money and especially mindfull of early U.S and how that played out with britian.
They created the Council on Foreign Relations, they created the media monopoly, etc..
[video=youtube;UGrPkLJSZr4]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UGrPkLJSZr4[/video]
Dan Kone
Well-Known Member
booo corn! switchgrass and sugar cane mofo!
Brick Top
New Member
I believe the reason or reasons behind dispensary shutdowns could be one or several combined.
The Feds don't want cannabis in any form. Polls show a majority of American's are either in favor of or don't care one way or another. Some States having made it legal on the State level for medicinal uses somewhat delegitimizes the Feds position if they do not take some action now and then just to remind the nation that at Federal level it is still illegal.
The Feds would likely be in favor of killing medicinal marijuana in one fell swoop if they could, and they might be looking for any and every possible, even very minor, infraction, and compiling data to use to try to get legislation to pass some new Federal law closing down all dispensaries at one based on the (trumped up) "high percentage" of them involving "illegal activity."
That or they may figure that they can't kill it, that it will only spread and are now trying to find a way to get a larger piece of the pie. They might say, OK, from now on it is nationwide, but there is an unacceptable level of quality of service provided, no industry standards, etc. and the government might say if it's going to exist, we the government, will run the dispensaries (either on the State or Federal level for actual daily operations. Like how some States have ABC stores, State controlled stores for hard spirits) and then the government can, and would, not only tax the hell out of it but add 'fees' for doing so.
Then of course anyone who supplied dispensaries would have to be fully legal to do it and meet stringent government requirements, which likely means 1000% more paperwork than would be needed, and of course transaction 'fees' on top of the taxation on the sale to the dispensary.
If that would be the case the system would be designed to squeeze out the current providers so then the government could either sell allotments to their chosen winners/major political contributors and it goes big business, or, even yet worse, the government decides to cut out the providers and grow it all themselves and totally control prices from day one to sale.
I have vague memories of someone trying to float legislation that would allow major pharmaceutical corporations to legally purchase and research marijuana for possible new drugs. Part of the legislation was the major pharmaceutical corporations could only purchase their marijuana from one single grower/supplier ..... Uncle Sam .. yep, the government wanted to do a "Green Acres" thing. But the idea probably was that major pharmaceutical corporations would likely pay any price, no matter how high, to be able to legally research and to have a constant supply when needed And if one of them does hit on some new wonder drug they can just do like they do now, price it at $100.00 per pill rather than $1.00 per pill like they otherwise could and make as much profit, and make it up off sick American's, or at least those who have insurance or can just afford to pay $100.00 per pill.
When you think about the various things that have at least been muttered about in meetings among members of Congress to what might be thought at The White House, what's been going on with dispensaries could either be a new normal routine working in the system or it could be something slow but amazingly detailed and devious at play.
[h=3][/h]
The Feds don't want cannabis in any form. Polls show a majority of American's are either in favor of or don't care one way or another. Some States having made it legal on the State level for medicinal uses somewhat delegitimizes the Feds position if they do not take some action now and then just to remind the nation that at Federal level it is still illegal.
The Feds would likely be in favor of killing medicinal marijuana in one fell swoop if they could, and they might be looking for any and every possible, even very minor, infraction, and compiling data to use to try to get legislation to pass some new Federal law closing down all dispensaries at one based on the (trumped up) "high percentage" of them involving "illegal activity."
That or they may figure that they can't kill it, that it will only spread and are now trying to find a way to get a larger piece of the pie. They might say, OK, from now on it is nationwide, but there is an unacceptable level of quality of service provided, no industry standards, etc. and the government might say if it's going to exist, we the government, will run the dispensaries (either on the State or Federal level for actual daily operations. Like how some States have ABC stores, State controlled stores for hard spirits) and then the government can, and would, not only tax the hell out of it but add 'fees' for doing so.
Then of course anyone who supplied dispensaries would have to be fully legal to do it and meet stringent government requirements, which likely means 1000% more paperwork than would be needed, and of course transaction 'fees' on top of the taxation on the sale to the dispensary.
If that would be the case the system would be designed to squeeze out the current providers so then the government could either sell allotments to their chosen winners/major political contributors and it goes big business, or, even yet worse, the government decides to cut out the providers and grow it all themselves and totally control prices from day one to sale.
I have vague memories of someone trying to float legislation that would allow major pharmaceutical corporations to legally purchase and research marijuana for possible new drugs. Part of the legislation was the major pharmaceutical corporations could only purchase their marijuana from one single grower/supplier ..... Uncle Sam .. yep, the government wanted to do a "Green Acres" thing. But the idea probably was that major pharmaceutical corporations would likely pay any price, no matter how high, to be able to legally research and to have a constant supply when needed And if one of them does hit on some new wonder drug they can just do like they do now, price it at $100.00 per pill rather than $1.00 per pill like they otherwise could and make as much profit, and make it up off sick American's, or at least those who have insurance or can just afford to pay $100.00 per pill.
When you think about the various things that have at least been muttered about in meetings among members of Congress to what might be thought at The White House, what's been going on with dispensaries could either be a new normal routine working in the system or it could be something slow but amazingly detailed and devious at play.
[h=3][/h]
fenderburn84
Well-Known Member
I'm back, sorry rough end to the night and I needed sleep. Very informative brick top and deprave I'm going to check out some videos today.