Does government have the "authority" to force mandatory vaccinations on unwilling individuals ? Where does that authority come from ?

PJ Diaz said:

What does his post that you responded to have to do with Qanon anyway? He was talking about the Nuremberg Code and coercion. Those are Qanon things now? I thought Qanon was just about Trump and Pizzagate.

Click to expand...

Look at his other posts in this forum. He’s another cookie-cutter consumer and propagator of Repug nonsense.

cannabineer said:

Look at his other posts in this forum. He’s another cookie-cutter consumer and propagator of Repug nonsense.

Click to expand...

I'm not interested in following people around. I was referring to a single post which you quoted.

The entire constellation of Q lies has found warm fertile soil in one of our two major political parties. This is an emerging and serious threat to our national security.

PJ Diaz said:

I'm not interested in following people around. I was referring to a single post which you quoted.

Click to expand...

Yeah, lazy, neener

cannabineer said:

Yeah, lazy, neener

Click to expand...

Just not a stalker, and I don't discount everything one person has to say simply based on their political views. Heck if I did that I'd never watch any Clint Eastwood movies.

PJ Diaz said:

Just not a stalker, and I don't discount everything one person has to say simply based on their political views. Heck if I did that I'd never watch any Clint Eastwood movies.

Click to expand...

Multiple sly insults, nice, you’ve earned your troll pay today.

cannabineer said:

Multiple sly insults, nice, you’ve earned your troll pay today.

Click to expand...

And you've earned yours as well with your typo nitpicking. Now the real question is, who's paying for lunch?

PJ Diaz said:

And you've earned yours as well with your typo nitpicking. Now the real question is, who's paying for lunch?

Click to expand...

Since you brought it up, tag! You’re it.

cannabineer said:

Since you brought it up, tag! You’re it.

Click to expand...

Now, you're trying to coerce me into paying for lunch eh? OK, fine, but you have to pay next time.

PJ Diaz said:

Now, you're trying to coerce me into paying for lunch eh? OK, fine, but you have to pay next time.

Click to expand...

I prefer to think of it as cohesion.

cannabineer said:

I prefer to think of it as cohesion.

Click to expand...

I'll bring Silly Putty.

PJ Diaz said:

I'll bring Silly Putty.

Click to expand...

I’ll bring the Sunday comics. Good times.

Employers can require as employment criteria and it's not against the law..how do we know this? Because you don't have to work for that Employer.

cannabineer said:

The entire constellation of Q lies has found warm fertile soil in one of our two major political parties. This is an emerging and serious threat to our national security.

Click to expand...

Maybe Ginny Thomas is Q?

schuylaar said:

Employers can require as employment criteria and it's not against the law..how do we know this? Because you don't have to work for that Employer.

Click to expand...

Except that by law they have to offer religious exemptions.

schuylaar said:

Maybe Ginny Thomas is Q?

Click to expand...

I see her more as follower than leader. But she’d be a good villain on the old Batman show. Please, though, no plus-sized catsuit.

CunningCanuk said:

I wasn’t referencing vaccines so you misread my post.

I’m all for vaccines and will get my 4th jab when required. Anyone who is able to get vaccinated and doesn’t is a fool, imo.

Click to expand...

Ah, mandates, authority? Apologies mate.

PJ Diaz said:

Except that by law they have to offer religious exemptions.

Click to expand...

There's a bit of an asterisk in there. You can't offer religious exemptions for government workers violating people's constitutional rights.

Since nobody's beliefs are better than others in the land of individual rights, I'm not a fan of religious exemptions unless all beliefs are exempt.

mooray said:

There's a bit of an asterisk in there. You can't offer religious exemptions for government workers violating people's constitutional rights.

Since nobody's beliefs are better than others in the land of individual rights, I'm not a fan of religious exemptions unless all beliefs are exempt.

Click to expand...

And there are too many beliefs with obstructive restrictions, like Christian Scientists and transfusions.

cannabineer said:

And there are too many beliefs with obstructive restrictions, like Christian Scientists and transfusions.

Click to expand...

I don't mind if people harm themselves over what I think is a stupid belief and cases where children are neglected due to religion are often getting picked up by state child neglect/abuse laws. I just don't like the idea of a hierarchy in the value of one's beliefs, especially when it comes to rights.