Donald Trump Private Citizen

captainmorgan

Well-Known Member
Judge Box Wine Jeanine.

 

Herb & Suds

Well-Known Member
Coming up on the 1 year anniversary on this gem of a post. guess i was wrong and Trump got locked up. Biden is a superb president. He definitely isnt a senile confused puppet who either (a) reads from a script, (b) asks the questions to reporters hes "allowed to" or (c) rambles incoherently.

not our man Joe.

“Tim Apple”
Nuff said
 

CunningCanuk

Well-Known Member
Coming up on the 1 year anniversary on this gem of a post. guess i was wrong and Trump got locked up. Biden is a superb president. He definitely isnt a senile confused puppet who either (a) reads from a script, (b) asks the questions to reporters hes "allowed to" or (c) rambles incoherently.

not our man Joe.

 

H G Griffin

Well-Known Member
First time I've ever agreed with the crypt keeper.



“I grew up in New Canaan and I’ve been reading Page Six since I was a little kid,” Coulter said. “I was well familiar with what a narcissistic, ridiculous, tacky, vulgar, arriviste this guy was. That I knew about. The one thing I underestimated, in fact, did not see at all is, I had no idea how abjectly stupid the man is.”

Holy fuck at the naked arrogance of the "elite" on the right! That first sentence amazing.


And the rednecks thought these people are their party? That the political right in the USA gives the tiniest fuck about the working class?
 

CatHedral

Well-Known Member
“I grew up in New Canaan and I’ve been reading Page Six since I was a little kid,” Coulter said. “I was well familiar with what a narcissistic, ridiculous, tacky, vulgar, arriviste this guy was. That I knew about. The one thing I underestimated, in fact, did not see at all is, I had no idea how abjectly stupid the man is.”

Holy fuck at the naked arrogance of the "elite" on the right! That first sentence amazing.


And the rednecks thought these people are their party? That the political right in the USA gives the tiniest fuck about the working class?
Their fuckgiving begins the moment they see a potential tax credit squandered on food and medicine for the loser class.
 

printer

Well-Known Member
Judge refuses Trump request to delay release of Jan. 6 docs amid appeal
Lawyers for former President Trump had asked for a stay after U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan rejected his lawsuit seeking to block the documents from being released while he appeals.

In a six-page decision on Wednesday, Chutkan, an Obama appointee, denied Trump's request for a temporary stay for essentially the same reasons that she ruled against blocking the documents from being handed over.

"In his renewed motion, despite the fact that he requests essentially the same relief as in his original preliminary injunction motion, Plaintiff has not advanced any new facts or arguments that persuade the court to reconsider its November 9, 2021, Order," Chutkan said in her decision.

"The court’s analysis previously rejecting Plaintiff’s requested relief is thus equally applicable here: Plaintiff is unlikely to succeed on the merits of his claims or suffer irreparable harm, and a balance of the equities and public interest bear against granting his requested relief," she added.

The move will likely mean that Trump's legal team will have to scramble ahead of Friday's deadline to get an emergency stay from the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals. If that fails, Trump will have to ask the Supreme Court to take action.

Chutkan ruled on Tuesday that Trump's claims of executive privilege over the requested National Archives documents was outweighed by the fact that President Biden had waived privilege.

"Plaintiff does not acknowledge the deference owed to the incumbent President’s judgment. His position that he may override the express will of the executive branch appears to be premised on the notion that his executive power 'exists in perpetuity,'" Chutkan wrote in a 39-page opinion. "But Presidents are not kings, and Plaintiff is not President."
 

H G Griffin

Well-Known Member
The move will likely mean that Trump's legal team will have to scramble ahead of Friday's deadline to get an emergency stay from the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals. If that fails, Trump will have to ask the Supreme Court to take action.
"If you lose in court, just go to a different court. If you lose there, keep going. We'll drag every issue on for as many billable hours as possible, costing the taxpayers countless millions."

Pathetic, moronic, fucking circus. Whoever has the most money to go long haul, or the most devious lawyers, win. Justice be fucked.

How do you tolerate this ridiculous excuse for a legal system?
 

printer

Well-Known Member
Trump International Hotel Washington DC sale put on indefinite hold
Published Thu, Nov 19 20203:21 PM ESTUpdated Fri, Nov 20 2020

Under the lease terms, The Trump Organization is required to pay $3 million a year over 60 years, with the annual rent escalating with inflation. The company also invested $200 million to renovate the property, with about $100 million of that loaned by Deutsche Bank, according to filings.
Trump admits to overpaying for the property
Hotel owners say the $3 million-a-year lease — far above competing bids when Trump won the rights in 2011 — makes it difficult for any future owner to make a profit. Trump admitted to overpaying for the property, telling The Washington Post in 2012: “I mean, we are paying too much for the Old Post Office. But we will make that so amazing that at some point in the future it’ll be very nice.”

Hotel executives and advisors say that given the lease terms, any bid to purchase the hotel today would have to be around $150 million to $175 million — less than the Trump Org.’s $200 million investment. That leaves the Trump Organization with the options to sell the property at a loss, default on the Deutsche Bank loan and turn over the keys, or try to keep the property and eventually turn a profit.

Bidders say the Trump Organization also required any buyer to keep the Trump name on the hotel, which helps the Trump brand but could be problematic for any buyer.
 

printer

Well-Known Member
Federal judge questions Democrats' effort to obtain Trump tax returns
During a hearing in a long-running lawsuit from the House Ways and Means Committee, U.S. District Judge Trevor McFadden appeared concerned about the prospect of allowing the panel to obtain Trump's personal records.
During one exchange, he questioned the Biden administration's Justice Department lawyer over the agency's reversal in the case.

"If Congress changes hands in a couple years here and a Republican chairman of the Ways and Means Committee asks for Hunter Biden's tax returns, are we just going to say, 'Oh, sure. You know, we've got to defer to Congress. They've said they're interested in legislating on presidential families, therefore we've got to turn them over'? Is that going to be the administration's position?" McFadden said.

The judge indicated that he is also grappling with comments made by the committee's chairman, Rep. Richard Neal (Mass.), and other Democrats about seeking the tax returns that suggest "there's something else going on" other than a valid legislative purpose.
It's unclear how McFadden, a Trump appointee, might rule in the case or whether he believes Democrats' various political comments about the tax returns would outweigh any valid purpose for the request.

Trump's lawyers filed a new complaint in August seeking to block the Biden administration from complying with the committee's request. They argue that the committee has no valid legislative purpose for the tax returns and that the request is intended only as an attack on the former president.
"The requests are tailored to, and in practical operation will affect, only President Trump," the filing reads. "The requests single out President Trump because he is a Republican and a political opponent. They were made to retaliate against President Trump because of his policy positions, his political beliefs, and his protected speech, including the positions he took during the 2016 and 2020 campaigns."

The committee has maintained that the tax returns are important because Trump's "actions and statements raised unprecedented and serious concerns about his tax compliance and foreign entanglements and about the IRS’s ability to enforce the tax laws against him while President."

"Compared to past Presidents, Mr. Trump’s returns appear to be inordinately large and complex, reflecting his sprawling domestic and international business activities, which raises the question of whether the IRS has the requisite resources and authority to examine such returns as effectively as needed for a President," the committee's lawyers said in a court filing last month.

"And he repeatedly attacked the IRS and its audits of him both while a Presidential candidate and while President, which raised the important question of whether IRS employees are properly protected from a President’s attempts to improperly influence its audits," they added.
 

rkymtnman

Well-Known Member

DIY-HP-LED

Well-Known Member
I wonder what Donald will do when they get him in court, freak out no doubt!
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 

DIY-HP-LED

Well-Known Member
Ya know, everybody around Trump is coming out with a book, that probably means they kept notes every time they spoke to him, notes made at the time carry a lot of weight in court. I wonder if the FBI might be subpoenaing some of those notes by Trump insiders with interesting books out, it might yield a lot of useful information. Most of these assholes knew there might be a book deal in it and I have no doubt most of them kept daily notes, memorializing conversations, some might even have secret cellphone recordings, since a cellphone is as good as a wire these days.
 
Top