That is the contradiction of law being sold brother. Strictly adhering to those limits as you portray (public legal opinion), no or very little overages can "legally" be available to supply these newly created and well organized entities, no less provide uninterrupted supply as designed. It's why so many MMMA patients and caregivers are currently in prison. Tweed's run in outsourcing with the RCMP in Canada is yet another example of these realities.
But with the implementation of HB4271 cant organizations purely "manufacture" and use "agents" for transfers?My best educated guess is that CG/PT "overages" will not satisfy these licensed facilities market. They will then seek similar legislation on an expedited/emergency basis, then whatI'm sure millions have already been invested in plan B
It's about MJ production, and that is currently left to CG/PT's and standing MMMA. Once that fails a third entity will be created and likely will be referred to as licensed production facilities. This also seems necessary to complete the point of sale framework's integrity that will be sold as the only means of protecting us (general population). We (CG/PTs) will have then failed our community, been replaced by our community and will likely become criminal outcasts once again. It all logically follows in dialectic, but that story line seems just too easy
I don't see why any other production legislation would be needed, if with the implementation of HB4271 I could possibly grow as many plants as my local regulation dictates with the proper licensing. Then transfer everything to another center that sells it. If anything it is a warm up to CO style legalization.It's about MJ production, and that is currently left to CG/PT's and standing MMMA. Once that fails a third entity will be created and likely will be referred to as licensed production facilities. Also seems necessary to complete the point of sale framework that will be sold as means of protecting us. We will have then failed our community, been replaced by our community and will likely become criminals once again. It all logically follows in dialectic, but that story line seems just too east
Exacly, CO style legalization I would argue is the model in use here. Although, it is specifically the closed loop of their recreational side (licensed production, quality assurance and delivery), not the grandfathered in medicinal laws they enjoy today. Wholly medicinal I would argue follows the Canadian plight ...
It's actually not too closed loop. A caregiver doesn't even have to leave their house, if they have 15oz that a "center" wants to acquire.
That's conflating the two separate systems (med v rec), which is not an option here. Recreational licences facilities could not exist without specific licensed production, quality assurance and delivery facilities. My point here is that their recreational model is going to fundamentally be our medicinal, not simply supplemental to recreational as they and WA currently enjoy. You cannot comprehensively build a model, be it economic or regulatory, without taking production, quality assurance and delivery into consideration as a whole. How can anyone believe how we've been forced to operate under MMMA as a CG/PT at the threat of law enforcement is an acceptable means of production? This a big logical hole that should be apparent to anyone who cares to see it before they feel it.