Hobby Lobby Decision..

make it none of the employer's business what coverage their employees have. take employers out of the insurance brokerage business. next..........................
 
they refuse to cover plan B for their employees due to moral objection, but they have no problem profiting from plan B for themselves.

such sincerely held.

much sincerity.

so conviction.

very wow.
 
The Dictionary Act (yes, there is such a thing), which the court is obligated to use, defines “person” in the RFRA to encompass “corporations, companies, associations, firms, partnerships, societies, and joint stock companies, as well as individuals.”
 
DonAlejandroVega said:
make it none of the employer's business what coverage their employees have. take employers out of the insurance brokerage business. next..........................
Click to expand...

Thank FDR and his grand idea to freeze labor wages. Right around the time he was trying to change SCOTUS, dictating how much wheat a man could grow on his own property, putting Japanese Americans in "camps", and pushing policies that kept us in a depression until he left (Bush's fault ldo).

Liberals love him.
 
ttystikk said:
SCOTUS lost its moral and ethical credibility with me when they affirmed that money was equivalent to free speech.

Clearly, they're nothing more than corporate greedheads themselves.
Click to expand...

Well, that is it. We don't let you be the judge of that. It is totally irrelevant. This is real.
They were never trying to seek your approval.

They don't need credibility. It is the Law.
 
DonAlejandroVega said:
make it none of the employer's business what coverage their employees have. take employers out of the insurance brokerage business. next..........................
Click to expand...

That is what the government is going to have to do. In the specific case of abortion inducing drugs, the feds plan to handle that on their own ala single-payer.

The progs are all butt hurt because they can't force the pope to abort and then consume a baby on Easter sunday. This progressive War on Religion will end badly for all us.
 
UncleBuck said:
all hormonal birth control can prevent a fertilized egg from implanting, which is abortion by their narrow, extremist definition.

not that they mind profiting from these exact same drugs, mind you. they just won't pay for them.

making money from them is a completely different "sincerely held" belief altogether.
Click to expand...

Start a charity to help women who can't afford BC pills and I'll make a donation.

Or you could sit on the internet all day bitching about what a travesty it is you don't get to force people to pay for things they don't want, it's working so well for you.
 
ginwilly said:
Start a charity to help women who can't afford BC pills and I'll make a donation.

Or you could sit on the internet all day bitching about what a travesty it is you don't get to force people to pay for things they don't want, it's working so well for you.
Click to expand...

i don't want to pay for heart transplants to racist folks like you, but i really have no choice.

medicine is medicine, yours ain't any more special than your wife's, who left you.
 
UncleBuck said:
i don't want to pay for heart transplants to racist folks like you, but i really have no choice.

medicine is medicine, yours ain't any more special than your wife's, who left you.
Click to expand...

LOL

Like you contribute to my insurance in any way taker.
 
ginwilly said:
But keep preaching about what you have to pay others against your will.
Click to expand...

funny, that's the whole right wing argument in this case.

for some reason, you feel that other people's medicine is not as valid as yours.

i've never seen "libertarians" so opposed to greater liberty, save the whole keeping blacks out of stores argument.
 
NoDrama said:
The Dictionary Act (yes, there is such a thing), which the court is obligated to use, defines “person” in the RFRA to encompass “corporations, companies, associations, firms, partnerships, societies, and joint stock companies, as well as individuals.”
Click to expand...

Corporations are persons, too, legally. And the entire subject here is an exercise of lies.
Religious Freedom Restoration Act
.[1] The bill was passed by a unanimous U.S. House and a near unanimous U.S. Senate with three dissenting votes[2] and was signed into law by President Bill Clinton. It was held unconstitutional as applied to the states in the City of Boerne v. Flores decision in 1997, which ruled that the RFRA is not a proper exercise of Congress's enforcement power. But it continues to be applied to the federal government, for instance in Gonzales v. O Centro Espirita Beneficente Uniao do Vegetal, because Congress has broad authority to carve out exemptions from federal laws and regulations that it itself has authorized. In response to City of Boerne v. Flores, some individual states passed State Religious Freedom Restoration Acts that apply to state governments and local municipalities.

Self rule sucks for these wannabe partisans.

RIU is ridden by liars spreading lies.
 
UncleBuck said:
funny, that's the whole right wing argument in this case.

for some reason, you feel that other people's medicine is not as valid as yours.

i've never seen "libertarians" so opposed to greater liberty, save the whole keeping blacks out of stores argument.
Click to expand...

b l a h b l a h b l a h
 
The funniest part is that RFRA is a (mostly) Democrat piece of legislation. That was back when Dems saw some profit in pandering to religious people. Now the Dems see political benefit in conducting their War on Religion. Progs have only one value system: fascist control and imposition of an iron-handed rule. It will not end well.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top