HyperNormalization

SneekyNinja said:
It's called multitasking, retard.

We're not all abject failures like you and your girlfriend.

A guy with multiple accounts shilling LED's and a hygiene product telesales operator...

If you had kids together theyd be like a dumber Trump, thank fuck you's are too old and barren for that to occur.
Click to expand...
More hyperventilation, Stinkydigit?
 
Fogdog said:
My point about the 8 volume set is that our history has always been messy and surprisingly it all worked out anyway. Your block headed claims of 60 years of conspiracy by somebody is simply looking back and claiming "rigged". Not too different from the Illuminati and anti-Freemason conspiracy theories of the early 1800's.

Then you post a you-tube video and say it will all become clear if only I sit through 120 minutes of thought guide. Nope. Unlike you, I don't allow others to tell me what to think.

You are being used as a tool, tty. Your false conspiracy theories are aligning you with neo-Nazis and the hyper-rich elites like Trump.


LOL

Is "they let Japan bomb Pearl to unite the country in war" another conspiracy theory that you subscribe too?

#hopeless
Click to expand...
You ascribe plenty to me that I never said, then when I ask you for proof, you change the subject.

Your debate skills suck, you logic skills aren't much better and your ability to draw patterns in history is deplorable.

Other than that, I'm sure you're a nice guy.

Hopeless.
 
SneekyNinja said:
Dude you're the one following me around like a retarded dog that just wants to be kicked or something.

I'd 13 alerts when I woke up, most of them from you shitposting all night like the lonely, failed, faux intellectual you are.
Click to expand...
And still with the personal attacks.

It's as if you can't form a logical thought in a political discussion.
 
ttystikk said:
You ascribe plenty to me that I never said, then when I ask you for proof, you change the subject.

Your debate skills suck, you logic skills aren't much better and your ability to draw patterns in history is deplorable.

Other than that, I'm sure you're a nice guy.

Hopeless.
Click to expand...
LOL

And you can't follow a thread. Too funny that you claim "I think you'll come away with a much better understanding of why I'm a hard core Berniecrat; because the policies he espouses fit the situation and the needs of our society today."

Again, you project your self image of being "in the know when others aren't".

ttystikk said:
I posted this (2-hour thought guide you-tube vid) on another thread. If you watch it, I think you'll come away with a much better understanding of why I'm a hard core Berniecrat; because the policies he espouses fit the situation and the needs of our society today.

And you might learn something- not because I think you're stupid- I don't- but because Dr Blyth packs so much knowledge and makes so many connections that even the Fed Chairman is going to pick up something they hadn't considered before.
Click to expand...

Dude, most Democrats already support the policies that Bernie ran on last year. What you can't grasp is his policies are good but insufficient and not revolutionary.
 
Last edited:
Fogdog said:
LOL

And you can't follow a thread. Too funny that you claim "I think you'll come away with a much better understanding of why I'm a hard core Berniecrat; because the policies he espouses fit the situation and the needs of our society today."

Again, you project your self image of being "in the know when others aren't".



Dude, most Democrats already support the policies that Bernie ran on last year. What you can't grasp is his policies are good but insufficient and not revolutionary.
Click to expand...
No, I posted a video that explained the underlying economics of the political position I hold. If your prejudices don't allow you to watch it that isn't my problem.

It's the opposite of 'being in the know'; it's the genuine 'attempt to share'.

If Bernie's policies 'aren't sufficient' then where does that leave the Democratic Party?

In fact I agree; his platform is a good start but not all encompassing. This is a standard campaign strategy to avoid getting buried in the weeds and to project a clear and concise message.

I get it; you don't like Bernie so you'll pick at any loose thread.
 
ttystikk said:
No, I posted a video that explained the underlying economics of the political position I hold. If your prejudices don't allow you to watch it that isn't my problem.

It's the opposite of 'being in the know'; it's the genuine 'attempt to share'.

If Bernie's policies 'aren't sufficient' then where does that leave the Democratic Party?

In fact I agree; his platform is a good start but not all encompassing. This is a standard campaign strategy to avoid getting buried in the weeds and to project a clear and concise message.

I get it; you don't like Bernie so you'll pick at any loose thread.
Click to expand...
It's more an issue of not having two hours to waste watching your thought guide bullshit. Some of us read things in sections when we get a chance, because unlike you, not all of us sit home on the PC all day crying about how unfair it all is.
 
ttystikk said:
If Bernie's policies 'aren't sufficient' then where does that leave the Democratic Party?

In fact I agree; his platform is a good start but not all encompassing. This is a standard campaign strategy to avoid getting buried in the weeds and to project a clear and concise message.

I get it; you don't like Bernie so you'll pick at any loose thread.
Click to expand...
I like Bernie. It's the endless whines and cries by the people who couldn't move on after he lost that annoy me.

The win in Alabama should tell you that Bernie's fixation on economic issues cost him the primary. He's still avoiding black and Hispanic social issues. The Democratic party is a coalition. Ignoring one group over another didn't work in 2016, wouldn't work in 2017, won't succeed in 2018 and won't work in 2020.

Women's rights and Black leaders in Vermont have both said they felt invisible to Bernie. It wasn't any different when Bernie ran for the candidacy. Even after the election, when he said "people are tired of pc rhetoric" and then went on to completely butcher what pc rhetoric meant, Bernie showed that he's not the right man to lead the Democratic Party.

If I were asked if I approved of Bernie, I'd say yes. That doesn't mean I'll vote for him but I like him just fine.

There seem to be people in his "Our Revolution" reform effort that are better than Bernie is. This gives me hope for the future.
 
Last edited:
Fogdog said:
I like Bernie. It's the endless whines and cries by the people who couldn't move on after he lost that annoy me.

The win in Alabama should tell you that Bernie's fixation on economic issues cost him the primary. He's still avoiding black and Hispanic social issues. The Democratic party is a coalition and ignoring one group over another didn't work in 2016, wouldn't work in 2017, won't succeed in 2018 and won't work in 2020.

Women's rights and Black leaders in Vermont have both said they felt invisible to Bernie. It wasn't any different when Bernie ran for the candidacy. Even after the election, when he said "people are tired of pc rhetoric" and then went on to completely butcher what pc rhetoric meant, Bernie showed that he's not the right man to lead the Democratic Party.

If I were asked if I approved of Bernie, I'd say yes. That doesn't mean I'll vote for him but I like him just fine.

There seem to be people in his "Our Revolution" reform effort that are better than Bernie is. This gives me hope for the future.
Click to expand...

Yea, I don't think there are many Democrats and Independents who dislike Bernie. They just think his ideas are not sustainable, and are intelligent enough to understand that. Whereas many Republicans follow along blindly without regard to facts or reality, just because it's their team. Politics to them is a team sport.

Bernie supporters got lost in the "rigged" spark that Trump ignited. And many blindly followed without understanding reality, facts or possible outcomes.
 
SneekyNinja said:
It's more an issue of not having two hours to waste watching your thought guide bullshit. Some of us read things in sections when we get a chance, because unlike you, not all of us sit home on the PC all day crying about how unfair it all is.
Click to expand...
It's a lecture by an accomplished professor. Your mischaracterizations of the video are based solely on your ignorance. It is not my problem if you don't think your education is worth the time to invest in it.

And yes, the system is unfair, broken and sinking fast. Unlike you, I'm trying to do something about it. I'm starting with education and discussion and an attempt to understand the mindset of others.

What's your excuse, Stinkydigit?
 
Last edited:
Fogdog said:
I like Bernie. It's the endless whines and cries by the people who couldn't move on after he lost that annoy me.

The win in Alabama should tell you that Bernie's fixation on economic issues cost him the primary. He's still avoiding black and Hispanic social issues. The Democratic party is a coalition. Ignoring one group over another didn't work in 2016, wouldn't work in 2017, won't succeed in 2018 and won't work in 2020.

Women's rights and Black leaders in Vermont have both said they felt invisible to Bernie. It wasn't any different when Bernie ran for the candidacy. Even after the election, when he said "people are tired of pc rhetoric" and then went on to completely butcher what pc rhetoric meant, Bernie showed that he's not the right man to lead the Democratic Party.

If I were asked if I approved of Bernie, I'd say yes. That doesn't mean I'll vote for him but I like him just fine.

There seem to be people in his "Our Revolution" reform effort that are better than Bernie is. This gives me hope for the future.
Click to expand...
Bernie isn't 'avoiding black and Hispanic issues', he's focusing on the economic problems of our country with respect to those who are underprivileged and discriminated against. Considering that black and Hispanic Americans (Baltimore and Puerto Rico leap to mind as examples) are far more likely to be economically disadvantaged, I think his approach has merit. The fact that the Democratic Party hasn't addressed the economic troubles of these groups is highly suspicious and again shows his strategy as being on the solid ground of championing relevant solutions to their problems.
 
see4 said:
Yea, I don't think there are many Democrats and Independents who dislike Bernie. They just think his ideas are not sustainable, and are intelligent enough to understand that. Whereas many Republicans follow along blindly without regard to facts or reality, just because it's their team. Politics to them is a team sport.

Bernie supporters got lost in the "rigged" spark that Trump ignited. And many blindly followed without understanding reality, facts or possible outcomes.
Click to expand...
Funny how dismissive you are without a shred of evidence to support your claims.

In case you haven't noticed, neither Democrats or Republicans have been very good at promoting solutions for anyone who isn't already fabulously wealthy. I'm not willing to continue supporting that because I think it's a recipe for disaster. My evidence? The Roaring Twenties, the Crash of 1929 and the resulting Great Depression.
 
Last edited:
dagwood45431 said:
Make your own fucking points, shithead. How many times must you be told? Or you can keep defending youtube videos which isn't really the point. Dumbass.
Click to expand...
I have every right to express my points in any manner I see fit. I see no reason to dumb down my delivery for your convenience.

Yet, I did anyway; that video is full of pretty pictures even you might be able to understand.
 
ttystikk said:
I have every right to express my points in any manner I see fit. I see no reason to dumb down my delivery for your convenience.

Yet, I did anyway; that video is full of pretty pictures even you might be able to understand.
Click to expand...
You are incapable of forming intelligent debate, this is why smart people troll your arse, you are low grade entertainment after a scotch n a few spliffs
 
zeddd said:
You are incapable of forming intelligent debate, this is why smart people troll your arse, you are low grade entertainment after a scotch n a few spliffs
Click to expand...
How would you know? Recognizing intelligent debate requires intelligence, after all.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top