national emergency..

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
The US Border Patrol is a fascist organization that does not respect the constitutional rights of Americans and forcibly separates children from the families of asylum seekers, then abuses and even kills them.

Please name one government agency that fully respects any persons rights and won't eventually kill people for disobedience.
 

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member

The last part of your erroneous post was unnecessary. It is worth mentioning though, if your rude demeanor was brains, you'd be a genius. "IF".

Anyhow, in which ways would you say confiscatorial (sic) funding of an idea or concept means the entity doing the confiscating is showing respect for peoples right?

Are you saying if I rob you, but then use the money to build an orphanage, the orphanage magically erases my disrespect for your rights when I robbed you?
 
Last edited:

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
The last part of your erroneous post was unnecessary. It is worth mentioning though, if your rude demeanor was brains, you'd be a genius. "IF".

Anyhow, in which ways would you say confiscatorial (sic) funding of an idea or concept means the entity doing the confiscating is showing respect for peoples right?

Are you saying if I rob you, but then use the money to build an orphanage, the orphanage magically erases my disrespect for your rights when I robbed you?

For instance if you or I funded ourselves
Get a job
 

Roger A. Shrubber

Well-Known Member
The last part of your erroneous post was unnecessary. It is worth mentioning though, if your rude demeanor was brains, you'd be a genius. "IF".

Anyhow, in which ways would you say confiscatorial (sic) funding of an idea or concept means the entity doing the confiscating is showing respect for peoples right?

Are you saying if I rob you, but then use the money to build an orphanage, the orphanage magically erases my disrespect for your rights when I robbed you?
yeah....that's exactly what i'm saying.....you got it....
 

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
the border is just short of 2000 miles long....they're wanting to build 700-900 miles of wall.....right now they have 580 miles of wall. it's all useless.....doubling the length of the existing wall will be just as effective as it is right now.....fucking useless. the whole thing is fucking useless. they walk around it, they tunnel under it, they climb over it....they just cut holes in the fucking things and walk through.....it's all a symbol to make insecure little hateful fucks feel better about nothing....so it's no surprise to me at all that you support it...
and of course border guards support it....who the fuck do you think wants to be a border guard? the same hateful little fucks that don't want anyone different than them in the country....and it'll make them get out of their air conditioned vehicles and walk around a lot less often......
It's even more idiotic than you make it out to be. That five billion and change that Trump shut the government down over was slated for some new but also fixing and replacing in total 250 miles of fencing. We'd make the country safer if we designated the money to get rid of lead in municipal and home water pipes.
 

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
yeah....that's exactly what i'm saying.....you got it....
Despite your apparent sarcasm, your rationale / argument is pretty similar to my analogy. That's why you didn't offer a rebuttal, because you can't.

Did you know when people are faced with new information which undermines what they thought they knew they experience a phenomena known as "cognitive dissonance".
Did you know when people experience this dissonance they often display feelings of anger, anxiety, dread or discomfort ?

When people experience those things, their ability to address the messenger of the new (and accurate) information is sometimes impaired and people often cling to the old inaccurate information, because to reject it in favor of the new accurate information is too great a task for the simple minded person.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Despite your apparent sarcasm, your rationale / argument is pretty similar to my analogy. That's why you didn't offer a rebuttal, because you can't.

Did you know when people are faced with new information which undermines what they thought they knew they experience a phenomena known as "cognitive dissonance".
Did you know when people experience this dissonance they often display feelings of anger, anxiety, dread or discomfort ?

When people experience those things, their ability to address the messenger of the new (and accurate) information is sometimes impaired and people often cling to the old inaccurate information, because to reject it in favor of the new accurate information is too great a task for the simple minded person.
Get a job
 
Top