Senator Al Franken accused of sexual harassment

ttystikk

Well-Known Member
you sure bitch a lot about "doxxing" for a guy who says it was OK for russian spies to steal american information and use it against us in our presidential election.
You sure conflate totally unrelated concepts a lot in your misguided and logically bankrupt attempts to support your points.
 

ttystikk

Well-Known Member
that is not even remotely close to your claim that winning margins were not even reported. they were, you lying sack of shit.

nice blog though.
More insults.

Seems to be the best you can spew.

I hear there's an opening on Fix News. You should apply; they need another brittle angry Bill O'Reilly truth twister.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
More insults.

Seems to be the best you can spew.

I hear there's an opening on Fix News. You should apply; they need another brittle angry Bill O'Reilly truth twister.
calling you a lying sack of shit after catching you in yet another one of your endless lies is not an insult, it is a fact.

you claimed that they stopped reporting victory margins. they did not. you lied like a lying sack of shit.
 

ttystikk

Well-Known Member
calling you a lying sack of shit after catching you in yet another one of your endless lies is not an insult, it is a fact.

you claimed that they stopped reporting victory margins. they did not. you lied like a lying sack of shit.
They did and they said so.

Name-calling doesn't change the truth.

Histrionic much?
 

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
Ahhhhaaaahaaahaaaaa

More fake conspiracy theories

That guy talked about exit polls, derp

Bernie Sanders won 27 delegates to Clinton's 28 in Kentucky. A precinct botched the count that affected 2000 votes. Is this the big scandal that rigged the election?

Oregon went strongly to Sanders.

Go fishing elsewhere. Maybe you could pair up with a Moon landing was faked theorist to complain this was so that moonlings were unfairly counted too.
 

SneekyNinja

Well-Known Member
Doxing - is the Internet-based practice of researching and broadcasting private or identifiable information (especially personally identifiable information) about an individual or organization.

The methods employed to acquire this information include searching publicly available databases and social media websites (like Facebook), hacking, and social engineering. It is closely related to internet vigilantism and hacktivism.

Doxing may be carried out for various reasons, including to aid law enforcement, business analysis, extortion, coercion, harassment, online shaming, and vigilante justice.


Why did you dig up posts from Reddit, then post them here? What was the purpose of doing that? To try to shame me. That's doxing.


You're trying to use the things I said elsewhere specifically to try shame me on RIU. Your motive is what defines it as doxing
Still not doxxing to post something you've posted elsewhere under the same name.

You idiots are so dumb it's honestly ridiculous.

Don't post something online if you don't want it brought up.

Doxxing would be me posting Skytards full name, street address, company she works for and cell number.

That's doxxing and noone has engaged in that.
 

Padawanbater2

Well-Known Member
Still not doxxing
Yes it is. Your intent behind posting information outside of RIU with the explicit purpose of trying to shame is what makes it doxing

The only reason you choose to do it is because you've lost the intellectual battle in the realm of ideas. You don't see any of us actively seeking out things about you to retrieve and post here intended to try to embarrass or humiliate you. We don't do that because we don't need to do that. We've already won.
 

SneekyNinja

Well-Known Member
Yes it is. Your intent behind posting information outside of RIU with the explicit purpose of trying to shame is what makes it doxing

The only reason you choose to do it is because you've lost the intellectual battle in the realm of ideas. You don't see any of us actively seeking out things about you to retrieve and post here intended to try to embarrass or humiliate you. We don't do that because we don't need to do that. We've already won.
You're a liar and can't even get a definition right.

I've been using the internet since before you were jacking off to Power Rangers, you posting some retarded and wide reaching definition isn't going to change the meaning of a word people have been using for decades.

You're so fucking dumb, don't accuse people of "doxxing" because you don't know basic internet security and common sense.

I bet you don't even use a proxy service either.
 

Padawanbater2

Well-Known Member
You're a liar and can't even get a definition right.

I've been using the internet since before you were jacking off to Power Rangers, you posting some retarded and wide reaching definition isn't going to change the meaning of a word people have been using for decades.

You're so fucking dumb, don't accuse people of "doxxing" because you don't know basic internet security and common sense.

I bet you don't even use a proxy service either.
You've shown previous support for doxxing people for holding different political views before. IIRC you and Buck have both actively participated in seeking out personal information and then actually calling places of business to try to get people fired from their jobs. That's the sign of an extremely fragile position. If you were at all convinced of your convictions, what someone else might think of them wouldn't matter. This shows others how weak they actually are.
 

SneekyNinja

Well-Known Member
You've shown previous support for doxxing people for holding different political views before. IIRC you and Buck have both actively participated in seeking out personal information and then actually calling places of business to try to get people fired from their jobs. That's the sign of an extremely fragile position. If you were at all convinced of your convictions, what someone else might think of them wouldn't matter. This shows others how weak they actually are.
"Seeking out".

It's called typing a few words with delimiters into Google.

You shouldn't drive under the influence man, thats far worse.
 

ttystikk

Well-Known Member
"Seeking out".

It's called typing a few words with delimiters into Google.

You shouldn't drive under the influence man, thats far worse.
...which is nothing at all like actually having a debate on the merits. But you don't do that because your positions are bankrupt. The cognitive dissonance is making you dizzy.

But keep trying to redefine the terms.
 
Last edited:

SneekyNinja

Well-Known Member
...which is nothing at all like actually having a debate on the merits. But you don't do that because your positions are bankrupt. The cognitive dissonance is making you dizzy.

But keep trying to refine terms.
Will I post some pics and show exactly how pathetic and fat you really are?

Do I have your permission? Since you're so fucking great and wise and have an IQ of 700, you shouldn't have anything to hide, right?
 

Padawanbater2

Well-Known Member
"Seeking out".

It's called typing a few words with delimiters into Google.
Call it whatever you want. You actively support and encourage getting people fired from their jobs because you disagree with them politically. That shows others that the political position you support is too weak to stand on its own. Your political opponent presented a better argument that convinced more people of his position than yours and you simply couldn't stand it. You might succeed in getting him fired, but you absolutely failed to promote your political position. Now, even though your political position could have been correct, the fact that you resorted to measures outside the argument and tried to go after the guy on a personal level, it's tainted and people view it with much more skepticism than before. You did that. That's one of the ways progressive positions that are actually correct get weakened and watered down to the point that it's hard for average conservatives to even listen to. They hear you cry wolf about racism and sexism so much, when actual racism or sexism happens and you point it out, they don't take you seriously. You harm those you purport to want to protect the most.

So if it's about trying to shame somebody, you see why I don't need to seek out your personal information in order to do it. You freely do it yourself with every post on RIU
 

SneekyNinja

Well-Known Member
Call it whatever you want. You actively support and encourage getting people fired from their jobs because you disagree with them politically. That shows others that the political position you support is too weak to stand on its own. Your political opponent presented a better argument that convinced more people of his position than yours and you simply couldn't stand it. You might succeed in getting him fired, but you absolutely failed to promote your political position. Now, even though your political position could have been correct, the fact that you resorted to measures outside the argument and tried to go after the guy on a personal level, it's tainted and people view it with much more skepticism than before. You did that. That's one of the ways progressive positions that are actually correct get weakened and watered down to the point that it's hard for average conservatives to even listen to. They hear you cry wolf about racism and sexism so much, when actual racism or sexism happens and you point it out, they don't take you seriously. You harm those you purport to want to protect the most.

So if it's about trying to shame somebody, you see why I don't need to seek out your personal information in order to do it. You freely do it yourself with every post on RIU
I actually spoke out against people being fired for the shit they post online.

Calm down C, Jesus you're butthurt.
 

SneekyNinja

Well-Known Member
Sorry, but gonna have to ask for a citation on that one. You understand the skepticism I'm sure..
I told Buck and the others participating in a thread about getting racists fired that I didn't agree.

I've also posted no personally identifiable details about you or anything else, simply linked to other threads you've posted elsewhere.

You should really be paying me a fee for promoting your cross platform content.
 

Padawanbater2

Well-Known Member
I told Buck and the others participating in a thread about getting racists fired that I didn't agree.
What thread? Quote your post here. Let's see. I'll be happy to apologize about that if you can provide evidence that that's the case
I've also posted no personally identifiable details about you or anything else, simply linked to other threads you've posted elsewhere.
Linking to other threads posted elsewhere for the explicit purpose of embarrassing or shaming is doxxing. Why are you having such a hard time understanding this? You never gained my consent to post the things outside of RIU onto RIU. You did it because you thought it would discredit me or embarrass or shame me. That's doxxing, dickhead. Learn how to read a dictionary.
 

SneekyNinja

Well-Known Member
What thread? Quote your post here. Let's see. I'll be happy to apologize about that if you can provide evidence that that's the case

Linking to other threads posted elsewhere for the explicit purpose of embarrassing or shaming is doxxing. Why are you having such a hard time understanding this? You never gained my consent to post the things outside of RIU onto RIU. You did it because you thought it would discredit me or embarrass or shame me. That's doxxing, dickhead. Learn how to read a dictionary.
Doxxing is releasing personally identifiable information.

Linking to a thread where you promote duct tape asshole gaping is not personally identifiable information.

Linking to the arrest record for your DUI from the PD in Cali where you live would be doxxing.

I know subtle differences confuse you idiots so I won't make it more confusing than that.

And it's the internet, you gave implicit permission for people to repost what you've written by posting it in the first place, moron.

Is the quote feature on RIU doxxing too?
 
Top