Shitz getting deep ....real deeep!

vostok

Well-Known Member
ae19aab703469d6f0faccea518d1c40a.JPG
Many countries are falling into line, to be the first to diss the USA over the death of yet another colored kid, sick of the USA 2 timing ways..
from
CHINA:
Whose killing sparked the unrest, is "a stark reminder for Uncle Sam that there are a lot of human rights violations on its own soil," says China's official news agency Xinhua.
"It should first fix its own problems before criticizing other countries."
Xinhua adds that few other countries are "as self-righteous and complacent as the United States when it comes to human rights issues, but the Ferguson tragedy is apparently a slap in the face".

IRAN:
The conservative newspaper Kayhan carried a collage of pictures from Ferguson, including a US flag being set on fire. Its headline said: "A rebellion in 90 American cities as a result of the non-indictment of the murderer policeman."


Middle East
The story also features on the front pages of several Arab dailies.
In Egypt, Al-Wafd sums up the widely-expressed view in the headline "An uprising against racism in the USA".
Qatar's Al-Watan says US cities have been denouncing "lethal racism", and Syria's official Al-Thawrah newspaper notes that protests against police violence and racism are on the increase.
On social media, some Arabic-language posts have been mocking the US government and even gloating over its mishandling of the case. The Twitter hashtag #USAprotests in Arabic has been used more than 4,000 times since Tuesday.

Russia
The #Ferguson hashtag is also among the top 10 Twitter trends in Russia, and press articles have drawn parallels between Ferguson and the Maidan protests in Ukraine.
Ren TV plays on the racial aspect of the Ferguson protests and also brings in the Ukrainian crisis, describing the demonstrations as a "colour revolution" and "an attempt to start a civil war in the US".

Europe
Ferguson is also a front-page story in the German press.
Uwe Schmitt, the former Washington correspondent for Germany's centre-right daily Die Welt, writes it is a "predictable explosion" given the juxtaposition of a "grotesquely over-armed police force" with a black community "untouched by economic recovery".
_79274294_euro.jpg
He accuses many Americans of "self-delusion" when they ask how such violence can recur again and again, while abroad "people shake their heads unsurprised, either in mourning or glee".

So who would have thought that the great uncle sam, would be bought down by the death of a black kid, and the indifference of the white cop who killed him? Annex usa to Canada, save some souls before China or even Russia, show up............ for some old style 'pay back'...?


http://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-30207155
 
fuk them they've been around for thousands of years and still ain"t got their shit together. we've been here 200 something years and have saved the world once already. arguably 2 times but i dont count ww1 all that much.
 
Dude everyone hates us, just read the comment section on youtube. They want to be like us but can't their politicians are more corrupt then ours.
 
ae19aab703469d6f0faccea518d1c40a.JPG
Many countries are falling into line, to be the first to diss the USA over the death of yet another colored kid, sick of the USA 2 timing ways..
from
CHINA:
Whose killing sparked the unrest, is "a stark reminder for Uncle Sam that there are a lot of human rights violations on its own soil," says China's official news agency Xinhua.
"It should first fix its own problems before criticizing other countries."
Xinhua adds that few other countries are "as self-righteous and complacent as the United States when it comes to human rights issues, but the Ferguson tragedy is apparently a slap in the face".

IRAN:
The conservative newspaper Kayhan carried a collage of pictures from Ferguson, including a US flag being set on fire. Its headline said: "A rebellion in 90 American cities as a result of the non-indictment of the murderer policeman."


Middle East
The story also features on the front pages of several Arab dailies.
In Egypt, Al-Wafd sums up the widely-expressed view in the headline "An uprising against racism in the USA".
Qatar's Al-Watan says US cities have been denouncing "lethal racism", and Syria's official Al-Thawrah newspaper notes that protests against police violence and racism are on the increase.
On social media, some Arabic-language posts have been mocking the US government and even gloating over its mishandling of the case. The Twitter hashtag #USAprotests in Arabic has been used more than 4,000 times since Tuesday.

Russia
The #Ferguson hashtag is also among the top 10 Twitter trends in Russia, and press articles have drawn parallels between Ferguson and the Maidan protests in Ukraine.
Ren TV plays on the racial aspect of the Ferguson protests and also brings in the Ukrainian crisis, describing the demonstrations as a "colour revolution" and "an attempt to start a civil war in the US".

Europe
Ferguson is also a front-page story in the German press.
Uwe Schmitt, the former Washington correspondent for Germany's centre-right daily Die Welt, writes it is a "predictable explosion" given the juxtaposition of a "grotesquely over-armed police force" with a black community "untouched by economic recovery".
_79274294_euro.jpg
He accuses many Americans of "self-delusion" when they ask how such violence can recur again and again, while abroad "people shake their heads unsurprised, either in mourning or glee".

So who would have thought that the great uncle sam, would be bought down by the death of a black kid, and the indifference of the white cop who killed him? Annex usa to Canada, save some souls before China or even Russia, show up............ for some old style 'pay back'...?


http://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-30207155
america is not in flames.

a few radical nutjobs have tried to spark a "race war" hysteria but thats all it is, hysteria.

most of the black population aint rioting, looting, or demanding anybody be prosecuted, just a few assholes who want shit but will not work for it.

any excuse will suffice trigger a looting spree from those assholes, while the vast majority of the population considers them to be scum.

ferguson shoulda took a lesson from the shopkeepers in LA during the last "Black Friday Doorbuster Spectacular"

58852252.jpg
 
fuk them they've been around for thousands of years and still ain"t got their shit together. we've been here 200 something years and have saved the world once already. arguably 2 times but i dont count ww1 all that much.
Ww1 is much more serious than we remember it being.

Look for a video on YouTube called "the necessary war."

I'm pretty sure that's it's name.

Germany was ran by an absolute monarch, the Kaiser, and he was taking Europe over. He didn't know it at the time becuase he understood things in an 18th century military war. Economically Germany was the most powerful state and well on their way to domination. Another 10 or 15 years and they would have swamped the Royal Navy and had a massive empire.

Their totalitarian style would have snuffed out the emerging liberal democratic trends in Europe.

That video changed my mind about ww1. I just wish the generals hadn't been stuck one hundred years in the past.
 
I agree with some of your observations but..... The commonly held notion that it was started out of outrage over the assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand of Austria and his wife Sophie at the hands of Serbian nationalist secret society known as the “Black Hand” (which isn’t entirely correct). In fact, the Emperor Franz Josef himself expressed relief over the assassination because it rid him of an heir whom he deeply disliked. The Emperor commented that “God will not be mocked. A higher power had put back the ORDER I couldn’t maintain.”

INDEED, it wasn’t just the Emperor who was relieved; it was reported by an Austrian newspaper that the general consensus among the various political circles was that the assassination, though a tragedy, was for the best. As far as the Austrian people were concerned, it was noted “The event almost failed to make any impression whatever. On Sunday and Monday, the crowds in Vienna LISTENED TO MUSIC and drank wine as if nothing had happened.” Indeed, it took the government itself a full three weeks to react.

As you’ll see shortly, the “treaty alliance system” that was prevalent in Europe with numerous treaties interconnecting the various states was really at the heart of why what would have been a small conflict, not noteworthy in any way in HISTORY, escalated into one of the bloodiest wars in human history with over 15 million people dead. Somewhat ironically, the spark that set it all off was the assassination that nobody really cared about.

So why go to WAR over an assassination, if nobody cared? Because, while nobody seemed to much care about the assassination itself, Austria-Hungary had been looking for an excuse to wage a “preventative WAR” against Serbia as a state in order to weaken or destroy them so as to take back territory in the Balkans, which had been taken during the Balkan Wars. They had not taken it BACK UPto this point because they lacked Germany’s support; without that support, they feared Russia too much, because of the treaty Russia had with Serbia.

With the assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand and his wife on June 28th, 1914, Austria-Hungary was able to secure the PROMISE from Germany that it would aid in a war with Serbia and possibly Russia, if Russia chose to enter the fray due to their treaty with Serbia. It should be noted here that Austria-Hungary did not really expect Russia to enter the fray as they expected this to be a very small war that would be over quickly, before Russia would be obligated to respond. Now with Germany’s support if Russia did enter the fray, Austria-Hungary issued an ultimatum to Serbia with remarkably severe terms that Serbia would be sure to reject, thus giving Austria-Hungary an excuse to go launch a limited war on Serbia to reclaim territory in the Balkans.

Surprisingly, Serbia responded relatively well to the ultimatum, but they did dispute a few minor clauses, which gave Austria-Hungary the excuse they needed to go to war. At this point, the following general series of events happened due to a variety of existing treaties between various nations, which escalated this minor clash into the first “Great War”.

WWI MapRussia bound by their treaty with Serbia decides to come to Serbia’s aid.
Germany, with the recent treaty with Austria-Germany, declares war on Russia.
FRANCE, bound by an existing treaty with Russia, now is at war with Germany by association. Germany then invades Belgium to have easy access to France.
Britain, allied to France with an existing treaty, declares war against Germany. This was unexpected by Germany as they expected Britain to stay out of the war, due to the fact that the treaty with France was loosely worded and not entirely binding. However, Britain also had a 75 year old treaty with Belgium. So because of both of these treaties, they decided to declare war on Germany.
With BRITAIN now warring with Germany, Canada, India, Australia, New Zealand, and South Africa enter the WAR as they were colonies of Britain.
Japan honors an existing treaty with Britain and declares war on Germany.
Austria-Hungary declare war on Japan for declaring war on Germany.
The U.S. tries to stay out of the war but in 1917 decides to enter due to Germany’s submarines hindering the United States’ commercial shipping because the U.S. was SHIPPING A lot of supplies to the Allies.
So in the end, a small quick war over a minor land dispute got turned into a lengthy war that was joined by powers all over the globe due to a variety of existing treaties dating back as much as 75 years before the war started. All in all it was a convenient way of de-population, generating money and rearranging borders/social systems.
 
Last edited:
the governments control the media in these countries just like in america. every rerun on tv has been about 1 race issue or another this week....kinda fucked up timing or perfect???????
 
I'm sure back in the day in our small congregation's, racial discrimination was accepted as part and parcel of survival. Since trade roots forced integration and notably created mass migration, basically people have been forced to mix. People will mix voluntarily but a lot struggle to do so because of the hidden force that propagates against it
 
I'm sure back in the day in our small congregation's, racial discrimination was accepted as part and parcel of survival. Since trade roots forced integration and notably created mass migration, basically people have been forced to mix. People will mix voluntarily but a lot struggle to do so because of the hidden force that propagates against it
 
Back
Top